How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For every natural , is an abelian group, multiplication is a commutative monoid operation, and both distributive laws hold
Statement
For every , with addition and multiplication as in Addition and multiplication on by and :
- is an abelian group (Group and abelian group), with ;
- is a commutative monoid (Semigroup and monoid);
- multiplication distributes over addition on both sides.
The assertions include and . At , the two distinguished identities coincide because .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural number and classes in .
and , and these values are independent of representatives (Addition and multiplication on by and ).
is a commutative ring: addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, and are identities, every integer has an additive inverse, and multiplication distributes over addition (The integers form a commutative ring).
An abelian group is an associative commutative binary operation with an identity and inverses; a commutative monoid is an associative commutative binary operation with an identity (Group and abelian group, Semigroup and monoid).
Proof
Associativity and commutativity of addition follow from and .
The class is an additive identity, and is an additive inverse of , since and .
Associativity and commutativity of multiplication follow from and , while is a multiplicative identity because .
Left distributivity is ; right distributivity follows identically, or from commutativity.
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 verify the abelian-group clauses, step 1.3 verifies the commutative-monoid clauses, and step 1.4 gives both distributive laws.
Depends on
Used by
- Reversible modular multiplication by a unit Algorithm
- Shor factoring with verified output and bounded outer retries Algorithm
- The discriminant counts roots of Ax²+Bx+C≡0 (mod p) for odd prime p∤ A Corollary
- The Galois group of a cyclotomic extension is abelian Corollary
- Cyclic convolution wraps a high coefficient without zero padding Counterexample
- In ℤ/4 the sets A=B={0,2} have | A+B|=2, below the Cauchy–Davenport bound 3 Counterexample
- Over ℤ/2, an antisymmetric bilinear form need not be alternating Counterexample
- The action of ℤ/2 on two disjoint two-point orbits is free but not transitive Counterexample
- The radix-two split fails for odd N Counterexample
- The short exact sequence to Sₙ does not prove Bₙ torsion-free Counterexample
- Visible Artin relations alone do not prove presentation completeness Counterexample
- ℤ/1 has one element and satisfies [0]₁=[1]₁, so it is not a field Counterexample
- The commutator pairing of an extraspecial p-group relative to a chosen generator of its centre Definition
- The Heisenberg group of order p³ over ℤ/p Definition
- The recursive radix-two fast Fourier transform Definition
- The unit group (ℤ/n)^× and Euler's totient φ(n)=|(ℤ/n)^×| for n≥1 Definition
- The unitary discrete Fourier transform on ℤ/Nℤ Definition
- The unnormalised cyclic convolution on ℤ/Nℤ Definition
- The unnormalised engineering DFT and its conversion to the unitary transform Definition
- ⟨ a,b∣ a², b², aba⁻¹b⁻¹⟩≅(ℤ/2)×(ℤ/2) Example
- ⟨ a∣ aⁿ⟩≅(ℤ/n,+) for every n≥ 1 Example
- A Shor order sample for factoring fifteen Example
- A=B={0,1,2} in ℤ/7: the sumset has five elements and the bound is tight Example
- An involution on five points has three fixed points and one two-point orbit, verifying 5≡3 (mod 2) Example
- Annihilators of closed subgroups of Euclidean space Example
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, the Chinese-remainder map Z/6Z -> Z/2Z direct-sum Z/3Z is an isomorphism by local tests Example
- Cyclic convolution on ℤ/4ℤ via the DFT Example
- Dₙ≅⟨ r,s∣ rⁿ, s², srs⁻¹r⟩ for the dihedral group Dₙ=⟨{ρ,σ}⟩leqSym(ℤ/n), n≥ 3 Example
- Hom_ℤ(ℤ/m,ℤ/n)≅ℤ/gcd(m,n) for n≥1 Example
- Nonzero constant series can multiply to zero in (ℤ/4ℤ)⟦ x⟧ Example
- Over Z, the ideal (2) acts surjectively on Z/3Z but does not kill it Example
- Row operations track determinant correctly for a singular triangular matrix over ℤ/6 Example
- Shor factoring preprocessing and retry branches Example
- The action of ℤ/6 on the cosets of {0,3} is transitive with kernel {0,3} and is not faithful Example
- The five characters of Z/5Z and their orthogonality Example
- The four rotations of a square act freely, transitively and faithfully on its vertices Example
- The four-point radix-two FFT executed in full Example
- The Klein four-group as the direct product of two groups of order 2 Example
- The Pontryagin dual of a finite cyclic group Example
- The residue classes ℤ/n as a ℤ-module Example
…and 43 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Conrad, Modular Arithmetic (standard reference, not scraped)