How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The residue classes as a -module
Example
For , the additive group of residue classes is a left -module under
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , a scalar , and residue classes .
Addition and multiplication of residue classes are representative-independent (Addition and multiplication on by and ).
The integers form a commutative ring (The integers form a commutative ring).
The additive residue classes form an abelian group (For every natural , is an abelian group, multiplication is a commutative monoid operation, and both distributive laws hold).
A left module is an abelian group with a unital distributive associative scalar action (Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module).
Verification
The displayed action is representative-independent: replacing by a congruent integer leaves congruent modulo .
Integer distributivity and associativity give , , and .
Finally , and [L3] supplies the abelian additive group; therefore the module axioms hold.
Depends on
- Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module
- Addition and multiplication on $\mathbb{Z}/n$ by $[a]_n+[b]_n=[a+b]_n$ and $[a]_n[b]_n=[ab]_n$
- The integers form a commutative ring
- For every natural $n$, $(\mathbb{Z}/n,+)$ is an abelian group, multiplication is a commutative monoid operation, and both distributive laws hold
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 38 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- McGerty, Algebra II: Rings and Modules, Section 3 (standard reference, not scraped)