How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Left ideals are exactly the submodules of the regular left module
Example
Let be a ring. On its additive group define the left scalar action , using multiplication in . This makes the regular left module, written . A subset is a submodule of if and only if is a left ideal of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A ring and its underlying additive group.
A left module is an abelian group with a unital scalar action satisfying the two distributive laws and associativity of scalar multiplication (Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module).
A subset is a submodule exactly when it is an additive subgroup and is closed under multiplication by every scalar (Submodule of a module).
A left ideal is an additive subgroup such that for all and (Left, right and two-sided ideals).
In a ring, addition is an abelian-group operation, multiplication is associative and unital, and multiplication distributes over addition on both sides (Ring: an abelian group under addition and a monoid under multiplication, with multiplication distributing over addition on both sides).
Proof
The additive group of is abelian. For , the ring laws give , , , and . Thus makes a left -module.
If is a left ideal, then it is an additive subgroup and for all , . Hence it is a submodule of .
Conversely, if is a submodule of , then it is an additive subgroup and is closed under the scalar action, which here says exactly that for all , . Hence is a left ideal.
Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove the claimed equivalence.
Remarks
- With the right regular module , the same argument identifies its submodules with the right ideals. Two-sided ideals are precisely the subsets that are submodules in both regular-module structures.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 14 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- McGerty, Algebra II: Rings and Modules, Section 3 (standard reference, not scraped)