Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-02 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every common divisor of aa and bb divides gcd(a,b)\gcd(a,b); consequently d=gcd(a,b)d = \gcd(a,b) exactly when d0d \ge 0, dad \mid a, dbd \mid b, and every common divisor of aa and bb divides dd — a characterisation that holds at (a,b)=(0,0)(a,b) = (0,0) as well

Statement

Let a,bZa, b \in \mathbb{Z}. Every common divisor of aa and bb divides gcd(a,b)\gcd(a,b) (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd(a,b)\gcd(a,b), with the convention gcd(0,0):=0\gcd(0,0) := 0, Divisibility in Z\mathbb{Z}: dad \mid a when a=dqa = dq for some integer qq).

Consequently, for dZd \in \mathbb{Z} the following are equivalent:

  1. d=gcd(a,b)d = \gcd(a,b);
  2. d0d \ge 0, dad \mid a, dbd \mid b, and every common divisor of aa and bb divides dd.

This characterisation holds for every pair (a,b)(a,b), the pair (0,0)(0,0) included, where it returns the value gcd(0,0)=0\gcd(0,0) = 0 fixed by convention.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

For (a,b)(0,0)(a,b) \ne (0,0), gg is the greatest element of the set D(a,b)D(a,b) of common divisors, so in particular gD(a,b)g \in D(a,b), and g1g \ge 1; at (a,b)=(0,0)(a,b) = (0,0), g=0g = 0 by convention. In both cases g0g \ge 0 (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd(a,b)\gcd(a,b), with the convention gcd(0,0):=0\gcd(0,0) := 0).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose (a,b)(0,0)(a,b) \ne (0,0) and let cc be a common divisor of aa and bb. By [L2] fix x0,y0x_0, y_0 with ax0+by0=ga x_0 + b y_0 = g; then cgc \mid g by [L4].

L2L4
1.2

Suppose instead (a,b)=(0,0)(a,b) = (0,0). Then g=0g = 0, and every integer, in particular every common divisor cc, divides 0=g0 = g.

L1L3
1.3

gg itself is a common divisor of aa and bb: for (a,b)(0,0)(a,b) \ne (0,0) this is gD(a,b)g \in D(a,b), and for (a,b)=(0,0)(a,b) = (0,0) it is 000 \mid 0. And g0g \ge 0 in both cases.

L1L3
2.1

In both cases every common divisor of aa and bb divides gg; since the two cases are exhaustive, this is the first assertion.

step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Claim 1 implies claim 2: if d=gd = g then d0d \ge 0, dad \mid a and dbd \mid b by step 1.3, and every common divisor divides dd by step 2.1.

step 2.1step 1.3
3.2

Claim 2 implies claim 1: suppose d0d \ge 0, dad \mid a, dbd \mid b, and every common divisor of aa and bb divides dd. Then dd is a common divisor, so dgd \mid g by step 2.1; and gg is a common divisor by step 1.3, so gdg \mid d by hypothesis. Hence d=g|d| = |g| by [L5], and since d0d \ge 0 and g0g \ge 0 this reads d=d=g=gd = |d| = |g| = g.

step 2.1step 1.3L1L5L6
4.1

The two claims are therefore equivalent, for every pair (a,b)(a,b) including (0,0)(0,0), where step 1.2 and step 1.3 were proved directly from the convention rather than from a maximum.

step 1.2step 1.3step 3.1step 3.2

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 64 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources