How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
at the boundary: , , and the convention is exactly what makes true at
Example
The two boundary values of are
the first by is symmetric and unchanged by signs: ; moreover , , , and unless and the second by the convention fixed in Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention . The point of this example is that the second is not free: instantiating the scaling identity of for all integers , the identity holding at and at as well at gives
so is the only value the identity permits. The same conclusion follows from the identity taken at with : it reads , and an integer with is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers .
is a commutative ring: , , , multiplication distributes over addition, and every has an additive inverse (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers).
by the convention of Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention , and always.
Every integer divides (Divisibility in : when for some integer ), and every common divisor of and divides (Every common divisor of and divides ; consequently exactly when , , , and every common divisor of and divides — a characterisation that holds at as well).
The embedding has image exactly the nonnegative integers, and , since preserves addition (The naturals embed in the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).
Verification
for every , by [L3]; at this reads , agreeing with the convention.
Instantiate [L5] at : . The left side is and the right side is , so .
Instantiate [L5] at and : writing , it reads .
An integer satisfying is : adding to both sides gives . Combined with step 1.3, and with because is nonnegative, this is a second derivation of .
So the value is not chosen but determined, once the scaling identity is required to hold at every triple: steps 1.2 and 2.1 each force it, and step 1.1 shows it agrees with read at .
The divisibility reading agrees as well: every integer divides , so every common divisor of divides , and is a common divisor of that is nonnegative — which is exactly the characterisation of in [L7], returning the value .
Remarks
-
What goes wrong without a convention is not that some identity becomes awkward but that names nothing at all: the common divisors of are all of and have no greatest element (The common divisors of are all of and have no greatest element in the order of , so cannot be defined as a maximum and is fixed by convention).
-
is where the absolute value earns its place. Without it the natural guess would be negative for negative , and would fail to be nonnegative.
Depends on
- The naturals embed in the integers
- The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals
- Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor $\gcd(a,b)$, with the convention $\gcd(0,0) := 0$
- $\gcd$ is symmetric and unchanged by signs: $\gcd(a,b) = \gcd(b,a) = \gcd(|a|,|b|)$; moreover $\gcd(a,0) = |a|$, $\gcd(a,1) = 1$, $\gcd(a,a) = |a|$, and $\gcd(a,b) \ge 1$ unless $a = b = 0$
- $\gcd(ca, cb) = |c|\,\gcd(a,b)$ for all integers $a, b, c$, the identity holding at $c = 0$ and at $(a,b) = (0,0)$ as well
- Every common divisor of $a$ and $b$ divides $\gcd(a,b)$; consequently $d = \gcd(a,b)$ exactly when $d \ge 0$, $d \mid a$, $d \mid b$, and every common divisor of $a$ and $b$ divides $d$ — a characterisation that holds at $(a,b) = (0,0)$ as well
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- The absolute value $|a|$ of an integer
- Absolute value in $\mathbb{Z}$: $|a| \ge 0$; $|a| = 0$ exactly when $a = 0$; $|-a| = |a|$; $|ab| = |a|\,|b|$; $-|a| \le a \le |a|$; and $|a| \le c$ exactly when $-c \le a \le c$
- The integers form a commutative ring
- Arithmetic on the integers
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 62 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Greatest common divisor (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)