How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Content is the positive common divisor of the coefficients divisible by every common divisor
Statement
Let . Its content is positive, divides every coefficient, and is divisible by every integer that divides every coefficient. Consequently, is primitive exactly when no prime divides all of its coefficients.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonzero integer polynomial with trimmed coefficient list and iterated gcds , .
The final iterated gcd is the content, and primitiveness means content (Content and primitive integer polynomials).
Every common divisor of two integers divides their gcd, and that gcd is the nonnegative common divisor with this universal property (Every common divisor of and divides ; consequently exactly when , , , and every common divisor of and divides — a characterisation that holds at as well).
The induction principle proves a natural-number property from its base and successor cases (The principle of mathematical induction).
Every positive integer is a finite product of primes, with the empty product occurring only at (The fundamental theorem of arithmetic: every integer is a product of primes, and the factorisation is unique up to order — if with every and prime, then and for some ).
Proof
By induction on , [L2] shows that divides and that every common divisor of those coefficients divides ; the base uses .
The induction step replaces the universal common divisor of by and applies [L2] to , so [L3] and [L1] give the asserted characterization of ; positivity follows because some coefficient is nonzero.
If the content exceeds , [L4] supplies a prime divisor of it, which step 2.1 makes a divisor of every coefficient; conversely, any prime dividing every coefficient divides the content by step 2.1 and prevents it from being .
Depends on
- Content and primitive integer polynomials
- Every common divisor of $a$ and $b$ divides $\gcd(a,b)$; consequently $d = \gcd(a,b)$ exactly when $d \ge 0$, $d \mid a$, $d \mid b$, and every common divisor of $a$ and $b$ divides $d$ — a characterisation that holds at $(a,b) = (0,0)$ as well
- The principle of mathematical induction
- The fundamental theorem of arithmetic: every integer $n \ge 1$ is a product of primes, and the factorisation is unique up to order — if $\prod_{i<r} p_i = \prod_{j<s} q_j$ with every $p_i$ and $q_j$ prime, then $r = s$ and $q_i = p_{\pi(i)}$ for some $\pi \in \operatorname{Sym}(r)$
Used by
- If p is a prime not dividing n, a rational minimal polynomial of a primitive n-th root of unity also kills its p-th power Lemma
- The product of primitive integer polynomials is primitive, and contents multiply Lemma
- Φ_pʳ(t)=∑_k<pt^kpʳ⁻¹, and Φ_pʳ(t+1) is Eisenstein at p Proposition
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Content and primitive integer polynomials.
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Irreducibility Tests in Q[T], Appendix A.1 (standard reference, not scraped)