Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-03 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For positive integers a and b and every prime p: vp(gcd⁡(a,b))=min⁡{vp(a),vp(b)} and vp(lcm⁡(a,b))=max⁡{vp(a),vp(b)}; so the exponent-wise greatest common divisor is the gcd⁡ of the divisibility page and not a second notion

Statement

Let a,b∈Z with a≥1 and b≥1, write g:=gcd⁡(a,b) (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd⁡(a,b), with the convention gcd⁡(0,0):=0) and ℓ:=lcm⁡(a,b) (Common multiple, and the least common multiple lcm⁡(a,b), taken to be 0 when a=0 or b=0), and let p be any prime (Prime and composite integers: p is prime when p>1 and its only positive divisors are 1 and p). Then g≥1 and ℓ≥1, so all four valuations below are defined (The p-adic valuation vp(a) of a nonzero integer: the greatest k∈N with pk∣a), and

  1. vp(g)=min⁡{ vp(a), vp(b) };
  2. vp(ℓ)=max⁡{ vp(a), vp(b) },

the minimum and maximum being taken in N, whose order is total (≤ is a linear order on N).

  1. The exponent recipe does not define a second notion. If d≥1 satisfies vp(d)=min⁡{vp(a),vp(b)} for every prime p, then d=gcd⁡(a,b); and if d≥1 satisfies vp(d)=max⁡{vp(a),vp(b)} for every prime p, then d=lcm⁡(a,b).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Integers a,b≥1; g:=gcd⁡(a,b), ℓ:=lcm⁡(a,b); and, for a prime p, mp:=min⁡{vp(a),vp(b)} and Mp:=max⁡{vp(a),vp(b)}.

[L2]

For u,v both nonzero, lcm⁡(u,v) is the least positive common multiple of u and v; in particular u∣lcm⁡(u,v) and v∣lcm⁡(u,v) (Common multiple, and the least common multiple lcm⁡(a,b), taken to be 0 when a=0 or b=0).

[L3]

gcd⁡(u,v)⋅lcm⁡(u,v)=∣uv∣, and every common multiple of u and v is a multiple of lcm⁡(u,v) (Every common multiple of a and b is a multiple of lcm⁡(a,b), and gcd⁡(a,b)⋅lcm⁡(a,b)=∣ab∣).

[L4]

For positive u,w: u∣w exactly when vq(u)≤vq(w) for every prime q (For positive integers a and b: a∣b if and only if vp(a)≤vp(b) for every prime p).

[L9]

On N: the order is total, so any two naturals have a minimum and a maximum (≤ is a linear order on N); addition is commutative (Addition is commutative) and cancellative (Addition is cancellative); m≤n means m+c=n for some c (Order on the natural numbers, Addition of natural numbers); m<n exactly when σ(m)≤n, and 1=σ(0) (Discreteness: σ(n) is the immediate successor, The natural numbers N (von Neumann)).

[L10]

Z is a commutative ring; its order is total, antisymmetric and transitive, is compatible with addition, and positives are closed under multiplication; a product of two nonzero integers is nonzero and cancellation holds (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals, The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers, The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).

[L11]

ι:N→Z is injective and order preserving with image the nonnegative integers, ι(0)=0, ι(1)=1 (The naturals embed in the integers).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

0<1, and every integer x>0 satisfies x≥1: x=ι(j) with j≠0, so 1=σ(0)≤j and ι preserves the order.

L9L11
1.2

For naturals x,y the minimum and maximum exist by totality, and min⁡{x,y}+max⁡{x,y}=x+y: if x≤y the left side is x+y, and if y≤x it is y+x=x+y.

L9
2.1

a>0 and b>0, so a≠0, b≠0 and (a,b)≠(0,0); hence g≥1, and ℓ is the least positive common multiple of a and b, so ℓ≥1. All of a,b,g,ℓ are nonzero and their valuations are defined.

step 1.1L1L2L10
3.1

g∣a and g∣b, so vp(g)≤vp(a) and vp(g)≤vp(b) by [L4]; hence vp(g)≤mp.

step 2.1step 1.2L1L4
3.2

Conversely mp≤vp(a) and mp≤vp(b), so pmp∣a and pmp∣b by [L6]; thus pmp is a common divisor of a and b and therefore divides g. Since g≠0, [L6] applied to g gives mp≤vp(g).

step 2.1step 1.2L1L6
3.3

ab>0, so ∣ab∣=ab, and [L3] gives gℓ=ab. Applying [L5] to the nonzero pairs (g,ℓ) and (a,b) gives vp(g)+vp(ℓ)=vp(ab)=vp(a)+vp(b).

step 2.1L3L5L7L10
4.1

Clause 1: vp(g)=mp, by antisymmetry of the order on N.

step 3.1step 3.2L9
5.1

Clause 2: substituting step 4.1 and step 1.2, mp+vp(ℓ)=vp(a)+vp(b)=mp+Mp, so vp(ℓ)=Mp by cancellation of addition on N.

step 1.2step 4.1step 3.3L9
5.2

Clause 3, first half. Let d≥1 satisfy vp(d)=mp for every prime p. Then vp(d)=vp(g) for every p by step 4.1, so d∣g and g∣d by [L4], hence ∣d∣=∣g∣; both are positive, so d=g.

step 2.1step 4.1L4L7
6.1

Clause 3, second half, by the same argument with step 5.1 in place of step 4.1: vp(d)=Mp=vp(ℓ) for every p forces d∣ℓ and ℓ∣d, hence d=ℓ.

step 2.1step 5.1L4L7
7.1

Clauses 1, 2 and 3 are established.

step 4.1step 5.1step 5.2step 6.1∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources