Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For a prime p and a nonzero integer a: pvp(a)∣a and pvp(a)+1∤a; pk∣a holds exactly for k≤vp(a); vp(a)≥1 exactly when p∣a; vp(1)=vp(−1)=0; and vp(p)=1

Statement

Let p be a prime (Prime and composite integers: p is prime when p>1 and its only positive divisors are 1 and p), let a∈Z with a≠0, and write v:=vp(a) (The p-adic valuation vp(a) of a nonzero integer: the greatest k∈N with pk∣a). Powers are the natural powers of Powers gn: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=e in the commutative monoid (Z,⋅,1) ((Z,⋅,1) is a commutative monoid whose group of units is {1,−1}; equivalently u∣1 holds exactly for u=1 and u=−1), and k+1 means σ(k). Then:

  1. pk≥1 for every k∈N; in particular pk>0 and pk≠0;
  2. pv∣a and pv+1∤a;
  3. for k∈N: pk∣a if and only if k≤v;
  4. a=pva′ for some a′∈Z with a′≠0 and p∤a′;
  5. v≥1 if and only if p∣a;
  6. vp(1)=vp(−1)=0 and vp(p)=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A prime p, a nonzero integer a, and v:=vp(a).

[L1]

vp(a) is the greatest k∈N with pk∣a; in particular pv∣a, and pk∣a fails for every k>v (The p-adic valuation vp(a) of a nonzero integer: the greatest k∈N with pk∣a).

[L4]

Divisibility is reflexive and transitive; d∣u implies d∣uc; and d∣u, d∣−u, −d∣u are equivalent (Divisibility is reflexive and transitive on Z, and is linear: if d∣a and d∣b then d∣ax+by for all integers x,y; also d∣a implies d∣ac, −d∣a and d∣−a).

[L5]

d∣u means u=dc for some c∈Z (Divisibility in Z: d∣a when a=dq for some integer q).

[L8]

If xz=yz and z≠0 then x=y; and a product of two nonzero integers is nonzero (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).

[L9]

On N: m≤n means m+c=n for some c (Order on the natural numbers); σ(k)=k+1 (Addition of natural numbers, The natural numbers N (von Neumann)); k<σ(k) and m<σ(n) exactly when m≤n (On N the order is membership: m<n  ⟺  m∈n); m<n exactly when σ(m)≤n (Discreteness: σ(n) is the immediate successor); and ≤ is a linear order, so it is antisymmetric and total (≤ is a linear order on N).

[L10]

Z is a commutative ring, its order is total, antisymmetric and transitive and compatible with addition, and ι:N→Z is injective, order preserving, with image the nonnegative integers and ι(0)=0, ι(1)=1 (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals, The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers, The naturals embed in the integers).

[L11]

Induction on N: a subset containing 0 and closed under σ is all of N (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

p1=pσ(0)=p0⋅p=1⋅p=p.

L2L10
1.2

0<1<p in Z, since 1=ι(1) is nonnegative and differs from 0; hence p≠0, p≠1 and p≠−1.

L7L10
1.3

Clause 1. pv∣a by [L1], and v<σ(v)=v+1, so pv+1∣a would contradict the maximality of v; hence pv+1∤a.

L1L9
1.4

Clause 2, the other direction. If pk∣a then k belongs to the set of which v is the greatest element, so k≤v.

L1L9
2.1

Clause 0: pk≥1 for every k∈N. The set of such k contains 0, since p0=1; and if pk≥1 then pσ(k)=pkp has both factors ≥1>0, so the product is positive, hence ≥1 by discreteness of the order on Z (a positive integer is ι(j) with j≠0, so 1=σ(0)≤j and 1≤ι(j)). By induction the set is all of N, and in particular pk>0 and pk≠0.

step 1.1step 1.2L2L9L10L11
2.2

Clause 2, one direction. Let k≤v and write v=k+c with c∈N. Then pv=pk+c=pkpc, so pk∣pv; with pv∣a and transitivity, pk∣a.

step 1.3L1L3L4L5L9
2.3

Clause 3. By [L1] fix a′ with a=pva′. Then a′≠0, since a≠0. If p∣a′, say a′=pb, then a=pv(pb)=(pvp)b=pv+1b, so pv+1∣a, contradicting step 1.3. Hence p∤a′.

step 1.3L1L2L5L9L10choose
2.4

If k≥1 then p∣pk: write k=1+c, so pk=p1pc=p⋅pc.

step 1.1L3L5L9
3.1

Clause 4. If v≥1 then p=p1∣a by step 2.2. Conversely if p∣a then p1∣a, so 1≤v by step 1.4.

step 1.1step 2.2step 1.4
3.2

vp(1)=0. If pk∣1 with k≥1, then p∣pk∣1 by step 2.4 and transitivity, so p=1 or p=−1, contradicting step 1.2. So no k≥1 satisfies pk∣1, while p0=1∣1; the greatest such k is 0.

step 1.2step 2.4L1L2L4L6L9
3.3

vp(p)=1. First p1=p∣p, so 1≤vp(p) by step 1.4 applied to a:=p. Next p2∤p, where 2=σ(1): otherwise p=p2c=p(pc) for some c, and cancelling p≠0 gives 1=pc, so p∣1, contradicting step 1.2. Hence vp(p)<2 by step 2.2, that is vp(p)≤1, and antisymmetry gives vp(p)=1.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.2step 1.4L2L5L8L9
4.1

vp(−1)=0, because pk∣−1 holds exactly when pk∣1, so the two sets of exponents coincide.

step 3.2L1L4
5.1

Clauses 0 to 5 are established.

step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2step 1.4step 2.3step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1step 3.3∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

62 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources