How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is a commutative monoid whose group of units is ; equivalently holds exactly for and
Statement
, with the multiplication of Arithmetic on the integers, is a commutative monoid (Semigroup and monoid). Its group of units (Left inverse, right inverse, and invertible element of a monoid, The invertible elements of a monoid form a group under the restricted operation) is
and these are two distinct elements. Equivalently, for the condition (Divisibility in : when for some integer ) holds exactly when or .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with the operations of Arithmetic on the integers, and the embedding , , of The naturals embed in the integers.
is a commutative ring: multiplication is a function and is associative and commutative, , and every has an additive inverse , with and (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers).
The order on is total, antisymmetric and transitive, and positives are closed under multiplication; means together with (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers).
A binary operation on a set is a function ; a monoid is a set with an associative binary operation and a two-sided identity, and it is commutative when the operation is (Binary operation on a set; associativity, commutativity, and a subset closed under the operation, Left identity, right identity, and two-sided identity for a binary operation, Semigroup and monoid).
In a monoid , is a unit when it has a two-sided inverse, and denotes the set of units; is a group under the restricted operation (Left inverse, right inverse, and invertible element of a monoid, The invertible elements of a monoid form a group under the restricted operation, Group and abelian group).
means for some (Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
when and when (The absolute value of an integer); and exactly when (Absolute value in : ; exactly when ; ; ; ; and exactly when ).
is injective, preserves addition, multiplication and order, and its image is exactly the set of nonnegative integers; and (The naturals embed in the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).
On : if and only if (Discreteness: is the immediate successor); , and , so and (The natural numbers (von Neumann)); and for every (Order on the natural numbers).
Proof
Multiplication on is a function , hence a binary operation, and it is associative and commutative; is a two-sided identity, since and, by commutativity, . So is a commutative monoid.
For , being a unit of this monoid means for some , the two equations and being the same by commutativity; and for some is precisely . So .
Both and lie in : and .
, since lies in the image of , which is the set of nonnegative integers; hence . Also , since is injective and in .
Discreteness of : if then . Indeed , so for some ; because ; hence in , so , and applying , which preserves the order, gives .
: otherwise , whereas and because is injective and in .
Let . Since , [L6] gives and .
Also and , so , whence ; with step 2.1 and antisymmetry this gives .
From : if then , and if then , so . By totality one of the two holds, so or .
Combining, , a two-element set, and by [L4] it is a group under multiplication, with identity and with each of its elements its own inverse.
Remarks
-
Why this is proved here and not cited. The published example is an abelian group, is a commutative monoid that is not a group, and its group of units is records the same fact, , but it lives on an examples page, and pages of that kind are leaves in the library's reading order: nothing later may depend on them. The statement is therefore re-established here, on a spine, so that later pages have a citable home for it. The two agree; neither rests on the other.
-
The proof is an application of the divisor bound, not a computation. What makes the whole answer is that forces (If and then and ; hence the set of divisors of a nonzero integer is bounded above by ) while forces (discreteness), and antisymmetry closes the gap. Nothing about the decimal shape of an integer is used.
Depends on
- The integers form a commutative ring
- The integers form a totally ordered ring
- Arithmetic on the integers
- Order on the integers
- The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals
- Binary operation on a set; associativity, commutativity, and a subset closed under the operation
- Left identity, right identity, and two-sided identity for a binary operation
- Semigroup and monoid
- Left inverse, right inverse, and invertible element of a monoid
- The invertible elements of a monoid form a group under the restricted operation
- Group and abelian group
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- If $d \mid a$ and $a \ne 0$ then $d \ne 0$ and $|d| \le |a|$; hence the set of divisors of a nonzero integer is bounded above by $|a|$
- The absolute value $|a|$ of an integer
- Absolute value in $\mathbb{Z}$: $|a| \ge 0$; $|a| = 0$ exactly when $a = 0$; $|-a| = |a|$; $|ab| = |a|\,|b|$; $-|a| \le a \le |a|$; and $|a| \le c$ exactly when $-c \le a \le c$
- The naturals embed in the integers
- Discreteness: $\sigma(n)$ is the immediate successor
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- Order on the natural numbers
Used by
- A rational root of xᵏ = m is an integer: if k ≥ 1, m ∈ ℤ, x ∈ ℚ and xᵏ is the image of m, then x is the image of an integer Corollary
- Every nonzero integer n is u ∏_i<r pᵢ with u ∈ {1,-1} and every pᵢ prime; u and r are determined by n, and the list is determined up to a permutation Corollary
- For an integer p > 1: p is prime if and only if, for all integers a and b, p ∣ ab implies p ∣ a or p ∣ b Corollary
- For every prime p and positive n, xⁿ-p is irreducible over ℚ Corollary
- If a prime p divides a finite product ∏_i<n aᵢ of integers then p ∣ aᵢ for some i < n; at n = 0 the product is 1 and the hypothesis cannot hold Corollary
- 2ℤ is closed under addition, negation and multiplication and is not a subring of ℤ, because it does not contain 1 Counterexample
- Division with a degree-small remainder can fail over ℤ when the leading coefficient of the divisor is not a unit Counterexample
- If 1 were admitted as a prime, uniqueness would fail: 6 = 2 · 3 = 1 · 2 · 3 = 1 · 1 · 2 · 3, lists of different lengths that no permutation matches Counterexample
- In the multiplicative monoid H = {1, 4, 7, 10, …} of positive integers one more than a multiple of 3, the element 100 has two genuinely different factorisations into irreducibles, 4 · 25 and 10 · 10 Counterexample
- Coprime integers: gcd(a,b) = 1 Definition
- Prime and composite integers: p is prime when p > 1 and its only positive divisors are 1 and p Definition
- The p-adic valuation vₚ(a) of a nonzero integer: the greatest k ∈ ℕ with pᵏ ∣ a Definition
- 360 = 2³ · 3² · 5 and 84 = 2² · 3 · 7, with gcd(360,84) = 12 and lcm(360,84) = 2520 read off the exponents Example
- An integer matrix of determinant 2 is invertible over ℚ but not over ℤ Example
- For every n ∈ ℕ there are n consecutive composite integers: with N := ∏_j<n(j+2), each of N+2, …, N+n+1 is composite Example
- ℤ is an integral domain of characteristic 0 whose group of units is {1,-1}, so it is not a field: 2 is nonzero and not invertible Example
- ℤ sits inside ℚ as a subring that is not a subfield, so the inverse-closure clause of the subfield definition is doing work Example
- FALSE: every Fermat number 2^2ⁿ + 1 is prime False statement
- FALSE: for every finite list p₀, …, pₙ₋₁ of distinct primes, p₀ ⋯ pₙ₋₁ + 1 is prime False statement
- FALSE: In every commutative ring, each nonzero element is either a unit or a zero divisor False statement
- FALSE: n² + n + 41 is prime for every natural number n False statement
- a and b are coprime if and only if ax + by = 1 for some integers x, y; and in that case the only common divisors of a and b are 1 and -1 Lemma
- For a prime p and a nonzero integer a: p^vₚ(a) ∣ a and p^vₚ(a)+1 ∤ a; pᵏ ∣ a holds exactly for k ≤ vₚ(a); vₚ(a) ≥ 1 exactly when p ∣ a; vₚ(1) = vₚ(-1) = 0; and vₚ(p) = 1 Lemma
- For a prime p and any integer a, gcd(p,a) is p when p ∣ a and 1 otherwise; so p ∤ a makes p and a coprime Lemma
- For integers a and b the following are equivalent: a ∣ b and b ∣ a; b = ua for a unit u; |a| = |b|. Being associates is an equivalence relation whose class of a is {a, -a} Lemma
- gcd is symmetric and unchanged by signs: gcd(a,b) = gcd(b,a) = gcd(|a|,|b|); moreover gcd(a,0) = |a|, gcd(a,1) = 1, gcd(a,a) = |a|, and gcd(a,b) ≥ 1 unless a = b = 0 Lemma
- vₚ(ab) = vₚ(a) + vₚ(b) for nonzero integers a, b, and vₚ(a+b) ≥ min{vₚ(a), vₚ(b)} whenever a, b and a+b are all nonzero Lemma
- Euclid's theorem: for every n ∈ ℕ and every list p : n → ℤ of primes there is a prime not among p₀, …, pₙ₋₁; consequently the set of primes is not finite Theorem
- Every integer n ≥ 1 is a finite product of primes: there are r ∈ ℕ and a list p : r → ℤ of primes with n = ∏_i<r pᵢ, the case n = 1 being the empty product Theorem
- For n ≥ 1 and any injective list p : r → ℤ of primes containing every prime divisor of n, one has n = ∏_i<r pᵢ^ v_pᵢ(n); the exponents are determined by n, and v_q(n) = 0 for every prime q outside the list Theorem
- For positive integers a and b and every prime p: vₚ(gcd(a,b)) = min{vₚ(a), vₚ(b)} and vₚ(lcm(a,b)) = max{vₚ(a), vₚ(b)}; so the exponent-wise greatest common divisor is the gcd of the divisibility page and not a second notion Theorem
- The fundamental theorem of arithmetic: every integer n ≥ 1 is a product of primes, and the factorisation is unique up to order — if ∏_i<r pᵢ = ∏_j<s qⱼ with every pᵢ and qⱼ prime, then r = s and qᵢ = p_π(i) for some π ∈ Sym(r) Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 67 results over 25 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Unit (ring theory) (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)