Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

φ(m)φ(n)=φ(gcd⁡(m,n)) φ(lcm⁡(m,n))

Statement

For all integers m,n≥1,

φ(m) φ(n)=φ(gcd⁡(m,n)) φ(lcm⁡(m,n))

(The unit group (Z/n)× and Euler's totient φ(n)=∣(Z/n)×∣ for n≥1, Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd⁡(a,b), with the convention gcd⁡(0,0):=0, Common multiple, and the least common multiple lcm⁡(a,b), taken to be 0 when a=0 or b=0). At m=n=1 both sides are 1; at gcd⁡(m,n)=1 the identity is the multiplicativity φ(m)φ(n)=φ(mn).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Integers m,n≥1; write g:=gcd⁡(m,n) and ℓ:=lcm⁡(m,n), both ≥1 because m and n are nonzero. For a prime p (Prime and composite integers: p is prime when p>1 and its only positive divisors are 1 and p) and an integer e≥0 put w(p,e):=pe−pe−1 when e≥1 and w(p,0):=1. For k≥1 write D(k) for the set of primes dividing k (Divisibility in Z: d∣a when a=dq for some integer q); it is finite, being contained in {2,…,k} by If d∣a and a≠0 then d≠0 and ∣d∣≤∣a∣; hence the set of divisors of a nonzero integer is bounded above by ∣a∣. Put P:=D(m)∪D(n). Finite products over such sets are those of The sum ∑i∈Sai over a finite index set, and its product form.

[L1]

Let k≥1 and let p0,…,pr−1 be an injective finite list consisting exactly of the prime divisors of k; put ei:=vpi(k), so ei≥1. Then φ(k)=∏i<r(piei−piei−1) (Euler's product formula φ(n)=n∏p∣n(1−1/p)=∏pk∥n(pk−pk−1) for n≥1, stated through a finite injective list of its prime divisors).

[L3]

For a prime p and a nonzero integer a, vp(a) is the greatest k∈N with pk∣a (The p-adic valuation vp(a) of a nonzero integer: the greatest k∈N with pk∣a).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L3

For a prime p and an integer k≥1: p∣k if and only if vp(k)≥1. If vp(k)≥1 then p divides pvp(k), which divides k by [L3]; conversely p∣k says p1∣k, so the greatest such exponent is at least 1.

1.2L2given

For each p∈P write a:=vp(m) and b:=vp(n); then vp(g)=min⁡{a,b} and vp(ℓ)=max⁡{a,b} by [L2], and the unordered pair {min⁡{a,b},max⁡{a,b}} is {a,b}, so w(p,a) w(p,b)=w(p,vp(g)) w(p,vp(ℓ)).

2.1step 1.1L2

Consequently D(g)=D(m)∩D(n) and D(ℓ)=D(m)∪D(n): by [L2] and step 1.1, p∈D(g) says min⁡{vp(m),vp(n)}≥1, that is p∈D(m) and p∈D(n); and p∈D(ℓ) says max⁡{vp(m),vp(n)}≥1, that is p∈D(m) or p∈D(n).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1given

The set P is a finite set of primes containing D(m), D(n), D(g) and D(ℓ) by step 2.1. For every k∈{m,n,g,ℓ} one has φ(k)=∏p∈Pw(p,vp(k)): applying [L1] with the list D(k) gives φ(k)=∏p∈D(k)w(p,vp(k)), and for p∈P outside D(k) step 1.1 gives vp(k)=0, so the extra factors are w(p,0)=1.

4.1step 3.1step 1.2∎

Multiplying the equalities of step 1.2 over the finite set P and using step 3.1 four times gives φ(m)φ(n)=∏p∈Pw(p,vp(m))w(p,vp(n))=∏p∈Pw(p,vp(g))w(p,vp(ℓ))=φ(g)φ(ℓ).

Remarks

  • Why the identity is not simply multiplicativity. For coprime m and n it reduces to φ(mn)=φ(m)φ(n), but the general case is what the intersection theorem needs: the degrees of Q(μm) and Q(μn) multiply to the degree of the compositum times the degree of the intersection, and it is the gcd–lcm form of the identity that turns that into φ(gcd⁡(m,n)) (Q(μm)∩Q(μn)=Q(μgcd⁡(m,n))).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources