Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The canonical surjection from a free product to the direct product of its factors

Example

For groups G,H, the factor maps g↦(g,e) and h↦(e,h) induce a canonical surjection π:G∗H↠G×H. Every cross-commutator lies in ker⁡π, and if g,h are nonidentity then that commutator is nonidentity in the free product.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

For a family (Gi)i∈I, a free product is a group F with homomorphisms ιi:Gi→F in the sense of def-group-homomorphism, such that for every group H and every family of homomorphisms fi:Gi→H, there is a unique homomorphism f:F→H satisfying f∘ιi=fi for all i. It is denoted ∗i∈IGi. Injectivity of the maps ιi is not part of this definition. (The free product of an arbitrary family of groups).

[L2]

Every element of ∗i∈IGi has a unique reduced syllable expression. The identity is represented by the empty word, and no nonempty reduced word represents the identity. (Normal form theorem for free products).

[L3]

Let G and H be groups. Their external direct product has underlying set G×H:={(g,h):g∈G, h∈H} and componentwise operation (g,h)(g′,h′):=(gg′,hh′). The fact that this operation makes G×H a group, with the indicated identity and inverses, is proved in thm-external-direct-product-is-a-group. Until that result is used, this definition introduces only the set and its componentwise binary operation. (The external direct product G×H with componentwise multiplication).

[L4]

For groups G and H, the componentwise operation of def-external-direct-product-of-groups makes G×H a group. Its identity is (eG,eH), and (g,h)−1=(g−1,h−1). Moreover the coordinate maps πG(g,h)=g and πH(g,h)=h are group homomorphisms. (G×H is a group with identity (eG,eH), coordinatewise inverses, and homomorphic coordinate projections).

[L5]

Let G be a group. For g,h∈G, their commutator is [g,h]:=ghg−1h−1. This convention is fixed throughout; some sources use its inverse. By the inverse laws of lem-group-inverse-laws, one has [g,h]−1=hgh−1g−1=[h,g]. The commutator subgroup, or derived subgroup, is the subgroup generated by all commutators: [G,G]:=⟨{[g,h]:g,h∈G}⟩. The generated subgroup notation is that of def-generated-subgroup. (Commutators [g,h]=ghg−1h−1 and the commutator subgroup [G,G]).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Free-product universality gives π, and every (g,h)=(g,e)(e,h) lies in its image, so it is surjective.

givenL1L2L3L4L5
2.1

The two factor images commute in G×H, hence [g,h] maps to the identity.

step 1.1
3.1

For nonidentity g∈G, h∈H, the word ghg−1h−1 is a nonempty reduced word, so normal form makes it nonidentity. Thus the kernel is generally nontrivial.

step 2.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.