Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Congruent integers may be added, subtracted and multiplied: representative changes preserve both arithmetic operations

Statement

Let n,a,a′,b,b′∈Z. If a≡a′(modn) and b≡b′(modn), then

a+b≡a′+b′(modn),a−b≡a′−b′(modn),ab≡a′b′(modn).

In particular −a≡−a′(modn), and for every k∈N the natural powers of Powers gn: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=e satisfy ak≡(a′)k(modn).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Integers n,a,a′,b,b′ with a≡a′(modn) and b≡b′(modn).

[L1]
[L2]

Z is a commutative ring, so subtraction, distributivity and the identities used below are valid (The integers form a commutative ring).

[F2]

Natural powers in the multiplicative monoid of Z satisfy x0=1 and xk+1=xkx (Powers gn: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=e).

[L3]

A property true at 0 and inherited by successors holds for every natural number (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [F1], n∣(a−a′) and n∣(b−b′).

givenF1
2.1

Since (a+b)−(a′+b′)=(a−a′)+(b−b′), linearity gives a+b≡a′+b′(modn).

step 1.1F1L1L2
2.2

Since (a−b)−(a′−b′)=(a−a′)−(b−b′), linearity gives a−b≡a′−b′(modn); also n∣(a−a′) gives n∣−(a−a′)=(−a)−(−a′), so −a≡−a′(modn).

step 1.1F1L1L2
2.3

The identity ab−a′b′=a(b−b′)+b′(a−a′) and linearity give n∣(ab−a′b′), hence ab≡a′b′(modn).

step 1.1F1L1L2
3.1

The power claim holds at k=0 because a0=1=(a′)0. If it holds at k, then step 2.3 applied to ak≡(a′)k and a≡a′ gives ak+1=aka≡(a′)ka′=(a′)k+1. Thus it holds for every k∈N by induction.

step 2.3F2L3∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources