How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If divides then , and are all even
Statement
Let and suppose (Divisibility in : when for some integer ). Then , and are all even.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers with .
For , means (Congruence modulo an integer: when , including the moduli and ).
For , means for some (Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
For every integer : if is odd then , and if is even then (A square is congruent to , or modulo ).
For with there is exactly one pair of integers with and ; moreover holds exactly when (Division with remainder for any nonzero divisor: for and there are unique with and ).
Proof
By [L3] with each of is even or odd; let be how many of the three are odd, so is one of .
By [L1], modulo each odd coordinate contributes a square congruent to and each even coordinate contributes a square congruent to .
Adding the three contributions by [L2], , since the odd coordinates each contribute and the remaining ones contribute .
The hypothesis says by [F1] and [F2]; subtracting this from step 2.1 by the difference clause of [L2] gives , that is .
Since , [L3] applied with and has the unique pair , and it says holds exactly when ; so step 3.1 forces , meaning none of is odd, that is , and are all even.
Remarks
The modulus cannot be relaxed to . Divisibility of by leaves and both possible, and realises the second, so dividing the sum does not force the coordinates even. It is the count being pinned to a single residue modulo that makes the argument work, and that needs the modulus .
Where it is used. This is the halving step of Positive integers with are not sums of three integer squares: it is what licenses passing from a representation of to one of .
Depends on
- A square is congruent to $0$, $1$ or $4$ modulo $8$
- Congruence modulo an integer: $a\equiv b\pmod n$ when $n\mid(a-b)$, including the moduli $0$ and $1$
- Congruent integers may be added, subtracted and multiplied: representative changes preserve both arithmetic operations
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- Division with remainder for any nonzero divisor: for $a \in \mathbb{Z}$ and $b \ne 0$ there are unique $q, r \in \mathbb{Z}$ with $a = qb + r$ and $0 \le r < |b|$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Evan Dummit, Number Theory (part 9): The Geometry of Numbers, §9.1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Karl-Dieter Crisman, Number Theory: In Context and Interactive, §14.2 (standard reference, not scraped)