How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Congruence modulo every integer is an equivalence relation on
Statement
For every integer , the relation on (Congruence modulo an integer: when , including the moduli and ) is an equivalence relation (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set ). For it is equality, and for it is the universal relation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and integers .
Divisibility is reflexive and linear: and imply for all integers ; also implies (Divisibility is reflexive and transitive on , and is linear: if and then for all integers ; also implies , and ).
An equivalence relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set ).
Proof
Reflexivity: , so and .
Symmetry: if , then , hence , so .
Transitivity: if and , then and , hence , so .
Steps 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 establish the three clauses in [F2], so congruence modulo is an equivalence relation.
When , [F1] reads , which is equivalent to ; when , it always holds because .
Depends on
- Congruence modulo an integer: $a\equiv b\pmod n$ when $n\mid(a-b)$, including the moduli $0$ and $1$
- Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set $A/{\sim}$
- Divisibility is reflexive and transitive on $\mathbb{Z}$, and is linear: if $d \mid a$ and $d \mid b$ then $d \mid ax + by$ for all integers $x, y$; also $d \mid a$ implies $d \mid ac$, $-d \mid a$ and $d \mid -a$
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 37 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Conrad, Modular Arithmetic (standard reference, not scraped)