How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Descent step: a smaller multiple of is a sum of four squares
Statement
Let be a prime (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ), let be an integer with , and suppose is a sum of four integer squares (Representations as sums of four squares). Then there is an integer with for which is a sum of four integer squares.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime , an integer with , and a representation of as a sum of four integer squares.
An integer is prime when and with force or (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ).
A representation of a nonnegative integer as a sum of four squares is an ordered quadruple with (Representations as sums of four squares).
For , means (Congruence modulo an integer: when , including the moduli and ).
For , means for some (Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
For all integers , setting , , and gives (Euler's four-square product identity).
For an integer and there is exactly one integer with and , and consequently (The least absolute remainder modulo a positive integer).
If is prime, and for integers , then the least absolute remainders of modulo satisfy for an integer with (The centred residue quadruple of has norm with ).
If are nonzero then ; consequently, if and , then (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).
Proof
Fix integers with , which the hypothesis supplies.
Since , [L2] applies with modulus ; let be the least absolute remainders of modulo , so , , and modulo .
By [L3] applied to , and the representation of step 1.1, there is an integer with and .
Put ; substituting the congruences of step 2.1 and using [L4] gives , and by [F3], so .
Put , and ; the same substitution and [L4] give , and modulo .
Applying [L1] to and produces exactly the four quantities of steps 3.2 and 3.3 as , so .
By [F3] and [F4] the congruences of steps 3.2 and 3.3 say , , and ; write , , , with .
Substituting step 4.2 into step 4.1 gives .
Since is nonzero, by [L5], so cancelling in step 5.1 by [L5] gives .
The quadruple therefore represents as a sum of four integer squares, with from step 3.1.
Remarks
The sign pattern is doing the work. Steps 3.2 and 3.3 substitute , , , into the four bilinear forms of [L1] and read off that all four become divisible by : the first because it becomes the norm , the other three because they become expressions in which the terms cancel identically. That is a property of this particular choice of signs, and Why the descent fixes one sign pattern in the four-square identity records which other choices share it.
The hypothesis is used twice. It gives the modulus of [L2] and it is part of what [L3] needs; and it is not a restriction in practice, since is the case in which itself is already a sum of four squares and no descent is wanted.
Depends on
- Prime and composite integers: $p$ is prime when $p > 1$ and its only positive divisors are $1$ and $p$
- Representations as sums of four squares
- Euler's four-square product identity
- The least absolute remainder modulo a positive integer
- The centred residue quadruple of $pm=a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2$ has norm $mn$ with $1\le n<m$
- Congruent integers may be added, subtracted and multiplied: representative changes preserve both arithmetic operations
- Congruence modulo an integer: $a\equiv b\pmod n$ when $n\mid(a-b)$, including the moduli $0$ and $1$
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Proofs by Descent, §6, Theorem 6.6 (Step 2) (standard reference, not scraped)
- MIT 18.781 Theory of Numbers, Lecture 22, Theorem 80 (standard reference, not scraped)