How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Normal Families and Montel's Theorem
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Isolated Singularities and Laurent Series
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Argument Principle and Rouché's Theorem
- The Ascoli–Arzelà Theorem
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Residue Theorem and the Evaluation of Real Integrals
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Riemann Sphere and Möbius Transformations
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This page metrizes local uniform convergence on a plane domain by a canonical compact exhaustion, proves that the resulting function-space topology is independent of the chosen exhaustion, and shows that continuous functions are complete and holomorphic functions closed for that topology. Those topological preliminaries are the bookkeeping that makes normality unambiguous rather than exhaustion-dependent.
The core complex-analysis content is the Montel package. Local boundedness gives local equicontinuity by Cauchy estimates, compact-domain Ascoli then yields Montel's theorem by diagonal extraction, and the same compactness pattern proves the Vitali-Porter theorem and continuity of derivative operators. The page closes by transporting the whole story to sphere-valued meromorphic maps through the chordal metric, including the compact-target Ascoli criterion needed later for meromorphic normal families.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Every plane domain has the canonical nested compact exhaustion by distance and radius cutoffs
Statement
Let be a plane domain, and define for with the convention when . Then each is compact, one has and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A plane domain and the sets .
Proof
Each is bounded by and closed because limits preserve both the radius bound and the distance-to-boundary inequality, so [L1] makes each compact; early members are allowed to be empty.
If , then and , so a small disc about stays inside . Hence .
If , openness gives a closed disc ; choosing and puts in . Therefore .
Locally uniform convergence on a plane domain is the already-published compact-convergence notion
Remark
This page uses the already-published compact-convergence dictionary for local uniform convergence. Concretely, on a plane domain , a sequence of continuous maps converges locally uniformly exactly when it converges uniformly on every compact subset of (Locally uniform convergence on an open subset of the complex plane is compact convergence).
The point of the present page is not to redefine that notion, but to package it through a canonical compact exhaustion and the resulting weighted metric on function spaces.
The exhaustion metric on a function space over a plane domain
Definition
Fix a plane domain and a compact exhaustion of ; for this page the canonical exhaustion of Every plane domain has the canonical nested compact exhaustion by distance and radius cutoffs is the default choice. For functions , set and define the exhaustion metric by
Here the supremum is taken in , so is allowed, and . Thus each summand is a real number in , so the series converges absolutely. The metric is used on spaces of continuous or holomorphic functions on ; the next theorem shows that its convergent sequences are exactly the locally uniformly convergent ones.
The exhaustion metric induces exactly the topology of locally uniform convergence
Statement
Let be the canonical compact exhaustion of a plane domain , and let be a sequence of functions . Then Consequently the exhaustion metric induces exactly the topology of locally uniform convergence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The canonical exhaustion , the exhaustion metric , and a sequence .
The sets are compact, nested inside successive interiors, and exhaust (Every plane domain has the canonical nested compact exhaustion by distance and radius cutoffs).
On a plane domain, local uniform convergence is the same as uniform convergence on every compact subset (Locally uniform convergence on a plane domain is the already-published compact-convergence notion).
Proof
If , then each summand tends to , so uniformly on every .
Any compact set is contained in some because the interiors of the cover by [L1]. Step 1.1 then gives uniform convergence on every compact , and [L2] makes the convergence locally uniform.
Conversely, if locally uniformly, then [L2] gives uniform convergence on every , including the empty stages with zero supremum. A finite-head plus geometric-tail estimate then gives .
The compact-open topology on C(Ω,C) is independent of the chosen compact exhaustion
Statement
Any two compact exhaustions of a plane domain induce the same topology on by the weighted exhaustion metric. Equivalently, the compact-open topology on is independent of the chosen compact exhaustion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Two compact exhaustions of the same plane domain .
An exhaustion metric induces exactly local uniform convergence (The exhaustion metric induces exactly the topology of locally uniform convergence).
On a metric domain and metric target, the compact-open topology is the topology of compact convergence (For a metric domain and a metric target the compact-open topology on is the topology of compact convergence).
Proof
By [L1], each exhaustion metric induces the same convergence notion, namely local uniform convergence on .
Fact [L2] identifies that convergence notion with compact convergence and hence with the compact-open topology on . Therefore the induced topology is independent of the chosen exhaustion.
Continuous complex-valued functions on a plane domain are complete for an exhaustion metric
Statement
For a plane domain , the space of continuous complex-valued functions is complete for the canonical exhaustion metric.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A plane domain , its canonical exhaustion , and a -Cauchy sequence in .
A sequence of complex-valued functions is uniformly Cauchy on a set if and only if it converges uniformly on that set (A sequence of complex-valued functions converges uniformly if and only if it is uniformly Cauchy).
A uniform limit of continuous complex-valued functions is continuous (A uniform limit of continuous complex-valued functions is continuous).
The canonical exhaustion is nested and its interiors exhaust (Every plane domain has the canonical nested compact exhaustion by distance and radius cutoffs).
Proof
On each , the -Cauchy property makes uniformly Cauchy; if take the zero function there, and otherwise [L1] gives a uniform limit , which is continuous by [L2].
The nesting of [L3] makes these limits compatible on overlaps, so they glue to a single function . Because every point of lies in the interior of some by [L3], the glued function is continuous there.
Uniform convergence on each , together with the usual finite-head and geometric-tail estimate in the defining series, gives . Thus is complete for the exhaustion metric.
Holomorphic functions form a closed subspace for locally uniform convergence
Statement
The holomorphic functions on a plane domain form a closed subspace of for the topology of locally uniform convergence. Equivalently, a -limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A sequence of holomorphic functions converging in the exhaustion metric to a continuous limit .
Convergence in the exhaustion metric is exactly local uniform convergence (The exhaustion metric induces exactly the topology of locally uniform convergence).
A locally uniform limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic (Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic and their derivatives converge locally uniformly).
Proof
Fact [L1] turns the metric convergence into local uniform convergence on the domain.
Applying [L2] shows that the limit function is holomorphic. Hence holomorphic functions form a closed subspace for local uniform convergence.
Normal families of holomorphic functions on a plane domain
Definition
Let be a plane domain and let be a family of holomorphic functions on . The family is normal when every sequence in has a subsequence and a holomorphic function on such that locally uniformly on .
By Locally uniform convergence on a plane domain is the already-published compact-convergence notion, the same condition can be read as uniform convergence on every compact subset of .
Locally bounded families of functions on a plane domain
Definition
Let be a plane domain and let be a family of functions . The family is locally bounded when for every there are a radius and a real such that for every and every .
The bound and neighbourhood may depend on , but they are uniform over the whole family on that chosen neighbourhood.
Locally equicontinuous families of functions on a plane domain
Definition
Let be a plane domain and let be a family of functions . The family is locally equicontinuous when for every there is a radius with such that for every there is satisfying for every and every .
Thus the continuity modulus is shared by the whole family on some neighbourhood of each point.
Locally bounded holomorphic families are locally equicontinuous
Statement
Every locally bounded family of holomorphic functions on a plane domain is locally equicontinuous.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A locally bounded family of holomorphic functions on a plane domain .
Cauchy estimates bound derivatives on a smaller concentric disc from a common bound on a larger one (Cauchy estimates on a smaller concentric disc).
Proof
Fix . Local boundedness gives a closed disc and a common bound there for every . Applying [L1] to the inner disc gives the uniform derivative bound on that smaller disc.
The smaller closed disc is convex, so integrating along the line segment from to yields for every . This is the local equicontinuity estimate.
Montel's theorem: every locally bounded holomorphic family is normal
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, and therefore in particular Countable Choice and Dependent Choice for the successive subsequence selections. Let be a plane domain and let be locally bounded. Then is a normal family.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Choice, a plane domain , and a locally bounded family .
On a compact metric domain, compactness of the uniform closure is equivalent to equicontinuity and pointwise relative compactness (Ascoli–Arzelà in the uniform topology for nonempty compact metric domains).
Holomorphic functions are closed under locally uniform limits (Holomorphic functions form a closed subspace for locally uniform convergence).
The canonical exhaustion is compact, nested, and has interiors covering (Every plane domain has the canonical nested compact exhaustion by distance and radius cutoffs).
Locally bounded holomorphic families are locally equicontinuous (Locally bounded holomorphic families are locally equicontinuous).
In a metric space, compactness is equivalent to sequential compactness under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice (For a metric space, compact, countably compact, limit point compact, sequentially compact, and complete together with totally bounded are all equivalent, given countable choice and dependent choice).
Proof
On each compact stage of [L3], local boundedness plus [L4] makes the restricted family equicontinuous and pointwise relatively compact; hence [L1] makes its uniform closure compact.
Using [L5], choose successively a subsequence converging uniformly on , then a further subsequence converging uniformly on , and so on, and take the diagonal subsequence. This is the explicit Choice step named in the Statement.
For each fixed , the diagonal subsequence eventually lies in the th chosen subsequence, so it converges uniformly on . Because the interiors of the cover by [L3], this gives local uniform convergence on all of .
Fact [L2] makes the local uniform limit holomorphic, so every sequence in has a locally uniformly convergent subsequence in . That is exactly normality.
Normal holomorphic families are locally bounded
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Every normal family of holomorphic functions on a plane domain is locally bounded.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice and a normal family .
Normality means that every sequence in has a subsequence converging locally uniformly to a holomorphic limit (Normal families of holomorphic functions on a plane domain).
Proof
If were not locally bounded at some point, then on some closed disc there would be a sequence in with .
By [L1], a subsequence would converge uniformly on that disc to a holomorphic limit, and uniform convergence on a compact disc forces that subsequence to be uniformly bounded there. This contradicts step 1.1, so the family is locally bounded.
Vitali-Porter convergence theorem for holomorphic functions
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a plane domain and let be a locally bounded sequence in . Suppose there is a set with an accumulation point in such that converges for every . Then converges locally uniformly on to a holomorphic function.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Choice, a plane domain , a locally bounded holomorphic sequence , and a set on which the pointwise limit exists with an accumulation point in .
Locally bounded holomorphic families are normal (Montel's theorem: every locally bounded holomorphic family is normal).
Two holomorphic functions that agree on a set with an accumulation point in the domain agree everywhere (Identity theorem for holomorphic functions).
Proof
By [L1], every subsequence of has a further subsequence converging locally uniformly to a holomorphic limit. Any two such subsequential limits agree on , because the scalar sequence has a fixed pointwise limit there, so [L2] makes them equal on all of .
If the whole sequence did not converge locally uniformly to that common limit, then some subsequence would stay a definite distance away on a compact set. Applying [L1] again to that subsequence would produce a further subsequence converging locally uniformly to the same limit from step 1.1, which is impossible.
Therefore the full sequence converges locally uniformly on to a holomorphic function.
Every derivative operator is continuous for locally uniform convergence on holomorphic functions
Statement
For every natural number , including , the operator is continuous for local uniform convergence on a plane domain .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A sequence locally uniformly in .
A locally uniform limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic, and every derivative order converges locally uniformly as well (Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic and their derivatives converge locally uniformly).
Proof
Fact [L1] gives locally uniformly on for every natural .
This is exactly continuity of the operator , and the case is included because is the identity.
Chordal local uniform convergence and meromorphic normality
Definition
Let be a plane domain and let . The sequence converges chordally locally uniformly to when for every compact set , where is the chordal metric of The chordal metric on the Riemann sphere. For the empty compact set the displayed supremum is defined to be .
A family of meromorphic maps is meromorphically normal when every sequence in has a subsequence converging chordally locally uniformly either to a meromorphic map or to the constant map .
A chordally locally uniform meromorphic limit is meromorphic or identically infinity
Statement
Let be a plane domain, and let be meromorphic functions converging chordally locally uniformly to a map . Then is meromorphic or identically . If every is holomorphic, then is holomorphic or identically .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A plane domain and a chordally locally uniformly convergent sequence of meromorphic maps to .
Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic (Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic and their derivatives converge locally uniformly).
A locally uniform limit of nowhere-zero holomorphic functions is either identically zero or nowhere zero (Hurwitz's zero-free limit theorem).
Proof
A local uniform limit of continuous maps into the metric space is continuous, so is chordally continuous. If , choose a chordal neighbourhood of whose closure misses . On the chordal and Euclidean metrics are comparable, and continuity of together with chordal local uniform convergence gives a neighbourhood of with for all large . On the maps have no poles, hence are holomorphic there, and [L1] makes the Euclidean local uniform limit holomorphic near .
If , choose a chordal neighbourhood of whose complement is a closed Euclidean disc. Continuity of and chordal local uniform convergence give a neighbourhood of with for all large . The infinity-chart expressions and are then well-defined holomorphic maps on , and the same metric comparison turns into Euclidean local uniform convergence. Fact [L1] makes holomorphic, so is meromorphic at .
When every is holomorphic, the functions of step 1.2 are holomorphic and nowhere zero on . By [L2], their limit is either identically on or nowhere zero. Because , one gets on , so on . Thus the -value set of is open in the holomorphic-input case.
If takes some finite value, then steps 1.1 and 1.2 show that it is meromorphic at every point of ; otherwise . In the holomorphic-input case, the finite-value set is open by step 1.1 and the -value set is open by step 2.1, so connectedness leaves only the two possibilities: is holomorphic on all of , or .
Local chordal equicontinuity is equivalent to meromorphic normality on compact exhaustions
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice, and therefore in particular Countable Choice and Dependent Choice for the successive subsequence selections. Let be a plane domain and let be a family of meromorphic maps . Then where equicontinuity is taken with respect to the chordal metric on . Equivalently, it is enough to check that equicontinuity on each compact stage of the canonical exhaustion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Choice, a plane domain , and a family of meromorphic sphere-valued maps.
On a compact metric domain, compactness of the uniform closure is equivalent to equicontinuity and pointwise relative compactness (Ascoli–Arzelà in the uniform topology for nonempty compact metric domains).
The canonical exhaustion is compact, nested, and has interiors covering (Every plane domain has the canonical nested compact exhaustion by distance and radius cutoffs).
In a metric space, compactness and sequential compactness are equivalent under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice (For a metric space, compact, countably compact, limit point compact, sequentially compact, and complete together with totally bounded are all equivalent, given countable choice and dependent choice).
A chordally locally uniform meromorphic limit is meromorphic or identically (A chordally locally uniform meromorphic limit is meromorphic or identically infinity).
Proof
If the compact-set equicontinuity condition holds, then on each compact stage of [L2] the restricted family is equicontinuous. Pointwise relative compactness is automatic because the target sphere is compact, so [L1] makes the uniform closure on compact.
Using [L3], choose successively a subsequence converging uniformly on , then on , and so on, and take the diagonal subsequence. By [L2] that diagonal converges chordally locally uniformly on , and [L4] makes its limit meromorphic or identically . Thus compact-set chordal equicontinuity implies meromorphic normality.
Conversely, if is meromorphically normal, then every sequence of restrictions to a fixed has a uniformly convergent subsequence. Fact [L3] turns that sequential compactness into compactness of the restriction closure, and [L1] then gives equicontinuity on . Because every compact subset of lies in some stage of the exhaustion by [L2], the family is chordally equicontinuous on every compact subset.
The first two steps prove the forward implication and step 1.3 proves the reverse implication, so the two conditions are equivalent.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.