How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Limits of Real Functions
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The unit interval with its usual subspace topology supplies the deformation parameter. The product universal property, the open- and closed-preimage characterisations of continuity, and the characteristic property of subspaces control the resulting maps. Path components come from path-connectedness, while the Euclidean product topology and continuity of radial normalisation support the geometric constructions.
A homotopy is defined jointly on a product, with a relative version that fixes a chosen subspace pointwise. Direct reparametrisation and finite closed pasting make homotopy an equivalence relation compatible with composition. Nullhomotopy leads to contractibility, homotopy inverses define homotopy type, and deformation retracts provide canonical equivalences. Straight-line formulas contract convex Euclidean subsets, homotopy equivalences preserve path components, and radial normalisation identifies punctured Euclidean space with its unit sphere up to homotopy.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints
Definition
Write with its usual subspace topology, as in Paths, path-connected spaces and path components. Let and be topological spaces, and let be continuous maps (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).
A homotopy from to is a continuous map
from the product space (The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space) such that and for every . When such an exists, and are homotopic, written .
Let carry the subspace topology (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace). The homotopy is a homotopy relative to , or a homotopy rel , when
Thus a homotopy rel can exist only when , and every ordinary homotopy is a homotopy rel . We write when a homotopy rel exists.
If are paths with the same initial point and the same terminal point (Paths, path-connected spaces and path components), a path homotopy from to relative to the endpoints is a homotopy rel . Explicitly,
The first coordinate parametrises the path and the second coordinate parametrises the deformation.
Remarks
- The adjective relative means pointwise fixed throughout the deformation, not merely mapped back into .
- A homotopy is a map on a product. A family of maps is not by itself a homotopy unless the joint map is continuous.
Homotopy relative to a subspace is reflexive and symmetric
Statement
Let . Every continuous map is homotopic to itself rel . If , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Topological spaces , a subspace , continuous maps , and, for symmetry, a homotopy from to rel .
A homotopy rel is a continuous with and the prescribed endpoint maps and equal to their common value for every and (Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints).
The projections from a product are continuous, and a map into a product is continuous exactly when all of its components are continuous (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice).
A map is continuous exactly when preimages of open sets are open (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and , condition (b)).
In the usual topology of , the open balls are the intervals ; has the subspace topology (The absolute value makes a metric space: is a metric, its open balls are the intervals , and it is unbounded, Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
Proof
The projection is continuous by [L1]. For every open , is open, so is continuous by [L2].
The map , , is continuous: for and an open neighbourhood of , with open in , [L3] gives with ; then is an open neighbourhood of and , since .
The homotopy has and for , so it is a homotopy from to itself rel .
The map , , is continuous because its components are continuous by step 1.2 and [L1]. For every open , is open, so is continuous by [L2].
One has and ; for , . Hence is a homotopy from to rel .
Two homotopies relative to the same subspace concatenate after piecewise-linear reparametrisation
Statement
Let and let be continuous. If is a homotopy from to rel and is a homotopy from to rel , then
is a continuous homotopy from to rel .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Topological spaces , a subspace , continuous maps , and homotopies and .
The endpoint and relative conditions for and are those of Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints.
A map is continuous exactly when preimages of closed sets are closed (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and , condition (c)).
In a subspace, closed sets are exactly traces of ambient closed sets; restrictions of continuous maps to subspaces are continuous (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
Product projections are continuous, and a map into a product is continuous exactly when its components are continuous (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice).
A finite union of closed sets is closed, and the complement of an open set is closed (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).
In the usual topology of , open balls are open intervals; has the subspace topology (The absolute value makes a metric space: is a metric, its open balls are the intervals , and it is unbounded, Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
Proof
The sets and are closed in : their complements are respectively and , traces of open intervals of . Hence and are closed in , because they are the preimages of under the continuous time projection.
The maps , , and , , are continuous. Indeed, at any and for any ambient open interval of radius about , the relative interval of radius about maps into it, since ; [L5] turns these intervals into the required subspace neighbourhoods.
Define by . The first component is the restricted product projection and the second is after the time projection, so is continuous by [L2], step 1.2 and [L3].
The maps and are continuous: for every closed , or , which is closed by [L1]. On they agree, since .
Thus the displayed clauses define one function . If is closed, then is the union of , regarded as a closed subset of through the closed subspace , and , regarded likewise through . Each is closed by [L2] and steps 1.1 and 3.1, so their union is closed by [L4]. Hence is continuous by [L1].
At the first clause gives , and at the second gives . If , both clauses give the common value for every . Therefore is a homotopy from to rel .
Remarks
The continuity argument uses only a cover by the two closed sets and proves the finite pasting step directly. No assertion about an infinite closed cover is used.
Homotopy relative to a fixed subspace, and path homotopy relative to endpoints, are equivalence relations
Statement
For fixed spaces and a fixed subspace , the relation is an equivalence relation on the set of continuous maps that have a prescribed restriction to . In particular ordinary homotopy is an equivalence relation on the continuous maps .
For fixed endpoints , path homotopy relative to the endpoints is an equivalence relation on the set of paths from to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Spaces , a subspace , and the relations defined in Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints.
Homotopy rel is reflexive and symmetric (Homotopy relative to a subspace is reflexive and symmetric).
Homotopy rel is transitive by the two-piece reparametrisation construction (Two homotopies relative to the same subspace concatenate after piecewise-linear reparametrisation).
A relation is an equivalence relation exactly when it is reflexive, symmetric and transitive (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set ).
Proof
By [L1] and [L2], is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, so it is an equivalence relation by [L3]. Taking gives ordinary homotopy.
Paths from to are continuous maps with one prescribed restriction to the subspace , and their path homotopies are exactly homotopies rel . Hence step 1.1 applies to them.
Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies, including their relative form
Statement
Let be continuous and suppose for a subspace .
- If is continuous, , and , then .
- If is continuous, then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A homotopy from to rel , a continuous with , and a continuous .
The endpoint and relative conditions are those of Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints.
Product projections are continuous, and a map into a product is continuous exactly when its components are continuous (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice).
A map is continuous exactly when preimages of open sets are open (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and , condition (b)).
Proof
Define by . Its components are after the first projection and the second projection, so is continuous by [L1].
The composite is continuous by the same preimage calculation, and its endpoints are and ; for it has the fixed value . Thus it is a homotopy from to rel .
The composite is continuous: for every open , is open by [L2]. Its endpoints are and ; if , then , so . Thus it is a homotopy from to rel .
Steps 2.1 and 1.2 prove the two claims.
Nullhomotopic maps and contractible spaces
Definition
Let be continuous. The map is nullhomotopic if there is a point such that is homotopic to the constant map , (Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints).
A nonempty topological space is contractible if every continuous map to every topological space is nullhomotopic.
This definition separates the property of the space from the particular map . The next corollary proves that it is equivalent to the familiar condition that the identity map be nullhomotopic.
Remarks
- Nonemptiness is included so that a contracting point can be named. The empty space is not called contractible under this convention.
- The constant to which a map is homotopic may depend on the map. Contractibility does not assert that two arbitrary constant maps into a disconnected target are homotopic.
A nonempty space is contractible if and only if its identity map is nullhomotopic
Statement
For a nonempty topological space , the following are equivalent:
- is contractible.
- The identity map is nullhomotopic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty topological space .
is contractible when every continuous map from to every topological space is nullhomotopic; a map is nullhomotopic when it is homotopic to a constant map (Nullhomotopic maps and contractible spaces).
Postcomposition by a continuous map preserves homotopies (Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies, including their relative form, claim 2).
Proof
If is contractible, apply [A1] to the continuous map to conclude that is nullhomotopic.
Conversely suppose for some , and let be any continuous map. Postcomposition by gives by [L1]. Thus is nullhomotopic.
Since and in step 1.2 were arbitrary, every continuous map out of is nullhomotopic, so is contractible by [A1]. Together with step 1.1 this proves the equivalence.
Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type
Definition
Let be topological spaces. A continuous map is a homotopy equivalence if there is a continuous map such that
in the sense of Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints. Such a is a homotopy inverse of .
The spaces and have the same homotopy type, or are homotopy equivalent, written , when a homotopy equivalence exists.
The equations required of an ordinary inverse have been weakened to homotopies. Neither composite need equal the corresponding identity map, and a homotopy equivalence need not be bijective.
Having the same homotopy type is an equivalence relation on topological spaces
Statement
The relation “has the same homotopy type as” is reflexive, symmetric and transitive on topological spaces, hence is an equivalence relation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Topological spaces and homotopy equivalences and with homotopy inverses and .
A homotopy equivalence has a continuous homotopy inverse whose two composites are homotopic to the appropriate identity maps (Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type).
Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies (Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies, including their relative form).
Homotopy is symmetric and transitive (Homotopy relative to a fixed subspace, and path homotopy relative to endpoints, are equivalence relations).
A relation is an equivalence relation exactly when it is reflexive, symmetric and transitive (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set ).
Proof
The identity is a homotopy equivalence with itself as homotopy inverse, since both composites equal, and hence are homotopic to, .
If has homotopy inverse , the same two homotopies show that has homotopy inverse . Thus the relation is symmetric.
For transitivity, the composite has candidate homotopy inverse . By [A1], and .
Similarly, gives , and then gives .
Applying [L1] to gives , and [L2] with gives .
Steps 2.1 and 1.4 make a homotopy inverse of , so the relation is transitive. With steps 1.1 and 1.2, [L3] makes it an equivalence relation.
A continuous map homotopic to a homotopy equivalence is itself a homotopy equivalence
Statement
Let be continuous maps with . If is a homotopy equivalence, then is a homotopy equivalence. Every homotopy inverse of is also a homotopy inverse of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Continuous maps , a homotopy , and a homotopy inverse of .
Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies (Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies, including their relative form).
Proof
Postcomposing by gives by [L1], and [A1] with transitivity gives .
Precomposing by gives by [L1], and [A1] with transitivity gives .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 show that is a homotopy inverse of , so is a homotopy equivalence.
Retractions and deformation retracts, with a deformation retraction required to fix the retract pointwise
Definition
Let carry the subspace topology, and let be the inclusion (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
A continuous map is a retraction of onto if
equivalently, if for every . When such an exists, is a retract of .
The subspace is a deformation retract of if there are a retraction and a homotopy
Thus , , and for all and (Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints). The pair is a deformation retraction.
Some sources call the pointwise-fixed condition a strong deformation retract. In this library the word deformation retract always includes it.
The inclusion of a deformation retract is a homotopy equivalence with the retraction as homotopy inverse
Statement
If is a deformation retract of , with inclusion and retraction , then is a homotopy equivalence and is a homotopy inverse of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A deformation retraction of onto , with inclusion .
Retraction gives , and deformation retraction gives (Retractions and deformation retracts, with a deformation retraction required to fix the retract pointwise).
A continuous map is a homotopy equivalence when it has a continuous map whose composites with it are homotopic to the identity maps (Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type).
Proof
The equality is in particular a homotopy , while is in particular an ordinary homotopy.
Hence satisfies both homotopy-inverse conditions for , so is a homotopy equivalence with homotopy inverse .
Every nonempty retract of a contractible space is contractible
Statement
Let be contractible and let a nonempty subspace be a retract of . Then is contractible.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A contractible space , a nonempty retract , its inclusion , and a retraction .
For every nonempty space , the space is contractible if and only if is homotopic to a constant map (A nonempty space is contractible if and only if its identity map is nullhomotopic, Nullhomotopic maps and contractible spaces).
Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies (Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies, including their relative form).
Proof
By [L1], for some . Precompose this homotopy by and postcompose by . By [L2], .
The left side of step 1.1 is by [A1], and the right side is the constant map on with value . Thus is nullhomotopic.
Since is nonempty, step 2.1 and [L1] applied to show that is contractible.
A homotopy equivalence induces a bijection between path components
Statement
For a space , write for its set of path components. If is a homotopy equivalence, then
is a well-defined bijection. A homotopy inverse induces its inverse .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A homotopy equivalence with homotopy inverse .
Path components are the equivalence classes for the relation “joined by a path” (Paths, path-connected spaces and path components).
Product projections are continuous, and a map into a product is continuous exactly when its components are continuous (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice).
A map is continuous exactly when preimages of open sets are open (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and ).
Precomposition and postcomposition preserve homotopies (Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies, including their relative form).
Proof
If a path joins to , then is continuous because for every open ; it joins to . Hence points in one path component of have images in one path component of , so is well defined. The same argument defines .
If continuous maps are homotopic, then and lie in the same path component for every : precompose the homotopy by the continuous map from a one-point space selecting , using [L3]; the resulting homotopy of two maps from a point is exactly a path from to .
Apply step 1.2 to . For every , and lie in the same path component, so . Thus is the identity on .
Applying step 1.2 to similarly gives .
Therefore and are mutually inverse functions, so is a bijection.
For continuous maps into a convex subset of , the straight-line formula defines a continuous homotopy
Statement
Let . A subset is called convex here when
If is a topological space and are continuous, where has the subspace topology from , then
is continuous.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural , a convex subspace , a topological space , and continuous maps .
Convexity is the displayed condition in the Statement.
Product projections are continuous, and a map into a product is continuous exactly when all component maps are continuous (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice).
The product topology on agrees with its Euclidean metric topology for every (For the product topology on copies of the usual topology of is the metric topology of on , and hence also of and , so as a product and as a metric space are one space).
For maps from a metric space into , continuity is componentwise; sums and scalar multiples of continuous vector-valued maps and inner products of two such maps are continuous (A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions, clauses 1 and 3).
A map into a subspace is continuous exactly when its composite with the ambient inclusion is continuous (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
A map is continuous exactly when preimages of open sets are open (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and , condition (b)).
Proof
Addition and multiplication are continuous. Indeed the coordinate projections are continuous by [L1], and by [L2] may be read as continuous scalar functions on the Euclidean metric space . The identity map and the constant map are continuous, so [L3] makes their inner product continuous. The maps and are continuous by the componentwise part of [L3], and their inner product is continuous by its algebra part.
Consequently, if are continuous on an arbitrary topological space , then and are continuous: the pair is continuous by [L1] and [L2], and composing it with the two maps of step 1.1 is continuous because the preimage of an open set under a composite is an iterated preimage, which is open by [L5]. Constant functions and additive inverses are continuous by the same argument, using a constant component and the continuous scalar multiple supplied by [L3].
Let be the inclusion and put , . These ambient maps are continuous by [L4]. For , let and be the projections. Each scalar coordinate and is continuous: coordinate projections on are continuous by [L1] and [L2], and composites preserve continuity by the preimage calculation of step 2.1. The scalar map is continuous, also as a map into , by [L1] and [L4].
By step 2.1, for every the function is continuous on . Therefore the ambient map with these coordinates is continuous by [L1] and [L2].
Convexity [A1] gives for every . Since the composite of with the inclusion is , [L4] makes continuous into .
Remarks
The continuity argument uses only products, subspaces and ordinary Euclidean continuity. Convexity is used solely to ensure that the straight-line formula takes values in .
Any two continuous maps into a nonempty convex subset of are homotopic by straight lines
Statement
Let , let be nonempty and convex in the sense stated in For continuous maps into a convex subset of , the straight-line formula defines a continuous homotopy, and let be continuous. Then
is a homotopy from to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty convex with and continuous maps .
The straight-line formula defines a continuous map (For continuous maps into a convex subset of , the straight-line formula defines a continuous homotopy).
A homotopy from to is a continuous with and (Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints).
Proof
The map is continuous by [L1].
Substitution gives and for every .
Thus satisfies the continuity and endpoint conditions of [A1], so it is a homotopy from to .
Every nonempty convex subset of is contractible
Statement
Let . Every nonempty convex subset , with its Euclidean subspace topology, is contractible. More precisely, for each the formula
is a homotopy from to the constant map at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty convex subset and a point .
Any two continuous maps into a nonempty convex subset of are homotopic by the straight-line formula (Any two continuous maps into a nonempty convex subset of are homotopic by straight lines).
A nonempty space is contractible exactly when its identity map is nullhomotopic (A nonempty space is contractible if and only if its identity map is nullhomotopic).
Proof
Apply [L1] to and the constant map . The resulting homotopy is .
Thus is nullhomotopic, so is contractible by [L2].
Every nonempty contractible space is path-connected
Statement
Every nonempty contractible topological space is path-connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty contractible space and points .
The identity of is homotopic to a constant map for some (A nonempty space is contractible if and only if its identity map is nullhomotopic, Nullhomotopic maps and contractible spaces).
Paths define an equivalence relation: paths may be reversed and concatenated, and is path-connected exactly when every pair of points is joined by a path (Paths, path-connected spaces and path components).
Product projections are continuous, and a map into a product is continuous exactly when its components are continuous (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice).
A map is continuous exactly when preimages of open sets are open (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and ).
Proof
Let be a homotopy from to . For each , the map , , is continuous by [L2], its components being constant and the identity.
The map is continuous because is open for every open . It has and , so it is a path from to .
Step 2.1 gives a path from to and a path from to . Reversing the latter and concatenating it with the former gives a path from to by [A1].
Since were arbitrary, is path-connected.
For , radial normalisation is a deformation retraction of onto
Statement
Let , put , and let be the unit sphere. Radial normalisation
is a retraction, and
is a deformation retraction of onto .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural , and .
Radial normalisation is continuous (Radial normalisation is continuous on , Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of ).
The displayed is continuous, begins at , ends at , fixes every , and never reaches (For , the map is continuous on , starts at , ends at radial normalisation, fixes the unit sphere, and never reaches ).
A deformation retraction onto is a retraction together with a homotopy from the identity to the inclusion followed by , fixed pointwise on (Retractions and deformation retracts, with a deformation retraction required to fix the retract pointwise).
Proof
If then , so . Thus the continuous map of [L1] is a retraction.
By [L2], is a continuous homotopy in from to the inclusion followed by , and for every and .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 satisfy [A1], so is a deformation retraction of onto .
For , the punctured Euclidean space is homotopy equivalent to
Statement
For every , the punctured Euclidean space and the unit sphere have the same homotopy type.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural .
The unit sphere is a deformation retract of (For , radial normalisation is a deformation retraction of onto ).
The inclusion of a deformation retract is a homotopy equivalence (The inclusion of a deformation retract is a homotopy equivalence with the retraction as homotopy inverse).
Proof
By [L1], is a deformation retract of .
By [L2], its inclusion is a homotopy equivalence, so the two spaces have the same homotopy type.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
FALSE: every retract is a deformation retract
Statement
False claim. Every retract of a topological space is a deformation retract.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two-point set with the discrete topology and its singleton subspace .
A retraction satisfies on ; a deformation retraction additionally supplies a homotopy from to the inclusion followed by , fixed on (Retractions and deformation retracts, with a deformation retraction required to fix the retract pointwise).
Every map out of a discrete space is continuous, since every subset of its domain is open (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies).
A nonempty space whose identity is nullhomotopic is contractible, and every nonempty contractible space is path-connected (A nonempty space is contractible if and only if its identity map is nullhomotopic, Every nonempty contractible space is path-connected, Paths, path-connected spaces and path components).
Every path-connected space is connected (Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component).
A separation is a pair of disjoint nonempty open sets whose union is the space (Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets).
Refutation
Define by . This map is continuous by [L1] and satisfies , so it is a retraction by [A1].
Suppose were a deformation retract of . Since the inclusion followed by is the constant map , [A1] would give . Then would be contractible, hence path-connected by [L2], and hence connected by [L3].
But and are disjoint nonempty open subsets of the discrete space and their union is , so they form a separation by [L4]. Thus is disconnected.
Steps 1.2 and 1.3 contradict one another. Hence is a retract of by step 1.1 but is not a deformation retract, refuting the claim.
FALSE: homotopy-equivalent spaces must be homeomorphic
Statement
False claim. If two topological spaces are homotopy equivalent, then they are homeomorphic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A one-point space and the real line with its usual topology.
A map is a homotopy equivalence when it has a continuous with and (Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type).
The real line is a nonempty convex subset of itself, hence is contractible, and its identity is homotopic to the constant map at (Every nonempty convex subset of is contractible, A nonempty space is contractible if and only if its identity map is nullhomotopic).
A homeomorphism is in particular a bijection (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).
The set is uncountable, whereas a singleton is finite ( is uncountable (Cantor's nested intervals, 1874)).
Refutation
Define by and let be the unique map. Both are continuous: the preimage of an open set under either map is either empty or the whole domain.
No bijection exists by [L3], so no homeomorphism exists by [L2].
One has , while by [L1]. Thus is a homotopy equivalence with homotopy inverse by [A1].
Therefore and are homotopy equivalent by step 2.1 but not homeomorphic by step 1.2, refuting the claim.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.