How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The inclusion of a deformation retract is a homotopy equivalence with the retraction as homotopy inverse
Statement
If is a deformation retract of , with inclusion and retraction , then is a homotopy equivalence and is a homotopy inverse of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A deformation retraction of onto , with inclusion .
Retraction gives , and deformation retraction gives (Retractions and deformation retracts, with a deformation retraction required to fix the retract pointwise).
A continuous map is a homotopy equivalence when it has a continuous map whose composites with it are homotopic to the identity maps (Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type).
Proof
The equality is in particular a homotopy , while is in particular an ordinary homotopy.
Hence satisfies both homotopy-inverse conditions for , so is a homotopy equivalence with homotopy inverse .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 13 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Section 0 (standard reference, not scraped)