Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: homotopy-equivalent spaces must be homeomorphic

Statement

False claim. If two topological spaces are homotopy equivalent, then they are homeomorphic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A one-point space P={p}P=\{p\} and the real line R\mathbb R with its usual topology.

[A1]

A map f:XYf:X\to Y is a homotopy equivalence when it has a continuous g:YXg:Y\to X with gfidXg\circ f\simeq\operatorname{id}_X and fgidYf\circ g\simeq\operatorname{id}_Y (Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type).

[L1]

The real line is a nonempty convex subset of itself, hence is contractible, and its identity is homotopic to the constant map at 00 (Every nonempty convex subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is contractible, A nonempty space is contractible if and only if its identity map is nullhomotopic).

[L3]

The set R\mathbb R is uncountable, whereas a singleton is finite (R\mathbb{R} is uncountable (Cantor's nested intervals, 1874)).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Define i:PRi:P\to\mathbb R by i(p)=0i(p)=0 and let q:RPq:\mathbb R\to P be the unique map. Both are continuous: the preimage of an open set under either map is either empty or the whole domain.

construct
1.2

No bijection PRP\to\mathbb R exists by [L3], so no homeomorphism exists by [L2].

L2L3
2.1

One has qi=idPq\circ i=\operatorname{id}_P, while iq=c0idRi\circ q=c_0\simeq\operatorname{id}_{\mathbb R} by [L1]. Thus ii is a homotopy equivalence with homotopy inverse qq by [A1].

step 1.1L1A1
3.1

Therefore PP and R\mathbb R are homotopy equivalent by step 2.1 but not homeomorphic by step 1.2, refuting the claim.

step 2.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 69 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources