How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Limits of Real Functions
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The formula gives an explicit homotopy between maps into
Example
Let , let be a topological space, and let be continuous. Since is convex, the straight-line formula
deforms to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Continuous maps with .
The straight-line formula is continuous for maps into a convex subspace of (For continuous maps into a convex subset of , the straight-line formula defines a continuous homotopy).
Any two continuous maps into a nonempty convex subset of are homotopic by that formula (Any two continuous maps into a nonempty convex subset of are homotopic by straight lines).
Verification
For and , the vector lies in , so is convex.
The map is continuous by [L1].
Substitution gives and , so [L2] identifies as a homotopy from to .
Every nonempty interval and every with contracts to any chosen point
Example
Every nonempty interval is contractible. If , the contraction is
Likewise, for every , every chosen gives a contraction of by the same formula.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty interval , a point , and a natural .
Intervals are order-convex: if and , or , then (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
Every nonempty convex subset of with is contractible to any chosen point by straight lines (Every nonempty convex subset of is contractible).
Verification
For and , lies between and , so it lies in by [A1]. Thus , viewed as a subset of , is convex.
The whole space is convex, since it is closed under vector addition and scalar multiplication.
Apply [L1] to step 1.1 and the point to obtain the stated contraction of , and apply it to step 1.2 and any chosen point of to obtain the Euclidean contraction.
A one-point space and are homotopy equivalent but not homeomorphic
Example
Let be a one-point space. The maps , , and exhibit , although the spaces are not homeomorphic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-point space and the real line.
The real line contracts to by (Every nonempty interval and every with contracts to any chosen point).
A homotopy equivalence has a homotopy inverse whose composites are homotopic to the identity maps (Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type).
A homeomorphism is a bijection, and is uncountable (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological, is uncountable (Cantor's nested intervals, 1874)).
The refutation in FALSE: homotopy-equivalent spaces must be homeomorphic uses this same pair as its counterexample.
Verification
Both and are continuous, since the preimage of any open set is either empty or the entire one-point source or target preimage.
No bijection exists from the finite set to the uncountable set , so no homeomorphism exists by [L3].
One has and by [L1]. Hence and are homotopy inverses by [L2].
Steps 2.1 and 1.2 verify the claimed contrast, agreeing with [L4].
A singleton is a retract but not a deformation retract of the two-point discrete space
Example
Let have the discrete topology and let . The constant map is a retraction, but is not a deformation retract of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two-point discrete space and its singleton subspace .
Every map out of a discrete space is continuous (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies).
A deformation retraction would give a homotopy from to the constant map at (Retractions and deformation retracts, with a deformation retraction required to fix the retract pointwise).
The refutation in FALSE: every retract is a deformation retract proves that this is a retract of but not a deformation retract, because such a deformation would force the disconnected space to be path-connected (Paths, path-connected spaces and path components).
Verification
The map is continuous by [L1] and fixes the point of , so it is a retraction.
If a deformation retraction existed, [A1] would make homotopic to the constant map at ; the full contradiction with the separation is established in [L2].
Therefore is a retract but not a deformation retract of .
For every space , the cylinder deformation retracts onto
Example
For every topological space , put and . The maps
form a deformation retraction of onto .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A topological space , the product , and its subspace .
Product projections are continuous, and a map into a product is continuous exactly when its components are continuous (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice, The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space).
Straight-line homotopies between continuous maps into the convex interval are continuous (For continuous maps into a convex subset of , the straight-line formula defines a continuous homotopy).
A map is continuous exactly when preimages of open sets are open (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and ).
A deformation retraction consists of a retraction and a homotopy from the identity to the inclusion followed by it, fixed pointwise on the retract (Retractions and deformation retracts, with a deformation retraction required to fix the retract pointwise).
Verification
The map , , is continuous: its composite with the inclusion has the continuous components and the constant , so [L1] applies. It fixes every , hence is a retraction.
On the source , the second projection and the constant zero map are continuous. Since is convex, [L2] makes , , continuous.
One has , , and for every .
The first component is continuous as a composite of product projections, since the preimage of an open set is an iterated preimage and hence open by [L3]. Together with step 1.2, [L1] makes continuous into .
Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 1.3 satisfy [A1], so is a deformation retraction of onto .
The radial homotopy is checked explicitly on punctured Euclidean space and on the unit sphere
Example
For with , the radial deformation retraction onto is
At it is the identity, at it is radial normalisation, and every point of the unit sphere remains fixed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural , a point , a parameter , and a point .
The radial formula is continuous on , is nonzero there, starts at , ends at , and fixes norm-one vectors (For , the map is continuous on , starts at , ends at radial normalisation, fixes the unit sphere, and never reaches ).
This map and radial normalisation form a deformation retraction of onto (For , radial normalisation is a deformation retraction of onto ).
Verification
Substituting gives , and substituting gives .
If then , so for all .
Continuity and avoidance of the origin are supplied by [L1]. Thus steps 1.1 and 1.2 explicitly verify the endpoint and fixed-sphere clauses of the deformation retraction [L2].
Two paths with the same endpoints in a convex subset of are path homotopic relative to their endpoints
Example
Let be convex, with , and let be paths with the same initial and terminal points. Then
is a path homotopy from to relative to the endpoints.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A convex and paths with and .
The straight-line formula defines a continuous map (For continuous maps into a convex subset of , the straight-line formula defines a continuous homotopy).
A path homotopy relative endpoints is a homotopy with the path parameter on the first coordinate and with and fixed (Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints).
Verification
The map is continuous by [L1].
One has and . At the endpoints, and .
Thus satisfies all clauses of [A1], so it is a path homotopy from to relative to the endpoints.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.