How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The formula gives an explicit homotopy between maps into
Example
Let , let be a topological space, and let be continuous. Since is convex, the straight-line formula
deforms to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Continuous maps with .
The straight-line formula is continuous for maps into a convex subspace of (For continuous maps into a convex subset of , the straight-line formula defines a continuous homotopy).
Any two continuous maps into a nonempty convex subset of are homotopic by that formula (Any two continuous maps into a nonempty convex subset of are homotopic by straight lines).
Verification
For and , the vector lies in , so is convex.
The map is continuous by [L1].
Substitution gives and , so [L2] identifies as a homotopy from to .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 56 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Algebraic Topology lecture notes (UC Riverside) (standard reference, not scraped)