How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: a connected plane-domain complement in C already implies simple connectivity
Statement
False claim. If is a connected complex domain and is connected, then is simply connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The punctured plane witness from The punctured plane has connected complement in C but disconnected spherical complement.
The punctured plane has connected complement in but disconnected spherical complement, and is therefore not simply connected (The punctured plane has connected complement in C but disconnected spherical complement).
Refutation
Apply [L1] to . Its complement in is the connected set , but the domain is not simply connected.
So the displayed implication fails. The missing point is exactly that plane simple connectivity depends on the complement in , not merely in .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Proposition 4.3.7 (standard reference, not scraped)