How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives
Statement
Let be complex differentiable at , and let . Then
If , then is nonzero on some neighbourhood of , the reciprocal is complex differentiable at , and
Every constant function has derivative , and the identity function has derivative .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open set , a point , functions complex differentiable at , and scalars .
Complex differentiability at is existence of the difference-quotient limit at (Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions).
A complex-differentiable function is continuous at the point of differentiability (Complex differentiability at a point implies continuity there).
Complex modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
Proof
The difference quotients of a constant function and of the identity are respectively and , so their derivatives have those values.
Taking the finite linear combination of the two difference quotients gives .
For nonzero allowed ,
Suppose . Continuity [L1] supplies a neighbourhood of on which , and on this neighbourhood by [L2].
By [L1], , while the two quotients in step 1.3 tend to and ; hence the product formula follows.
For nonzero allowed in that neighbourhood,
The reciprocal factor in step 2.2 tends to , so the reciprocal derivative is . Applying the product rule to and simplifying gives the quotient formula.
Depends on
Used by
- A Möbius map (az+b)/(cz+d) with ad-bc≠0 is conformal wherever cz+d≠0 Example
- FALSE: existence of partial derivatives satisfying Cauchy–Riemann everywhere on an open set implies holomorphy False statement
- Complex polynomials are entire with the power-rule derivative, and rational functions are holomorphic wherever their denominator is nonzero Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 45 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Proposition 2.2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Orloff, MIT 18.04 Topic 2, §2.6.1 (standard reference, not scraped)