Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Riesz–Thorin estimate on the finite simple core

Statement

Let (X,A,μ) and (Y,B,ν) be sigma-finite measure spaces. Let T be a complex-linear map from the a.e. classes of complex finite simple functions of finite-measure nonzero set on X into measurable complex a.e. classes on Y. Suppose TfqMfp(=0,1),1p0,p1<,1q0,q1,0M0,M1<. Then for 0<θ<1 and the reciprocal-affine exponents pθ,qθ, TfLqθ(ν),TfqθM01θM1θfpθ. The same conclusion holds on arbitrary source and target measure spaces when q0,q1<. At theta equal to zero or one use the given endpoint estimates, with no convention for 00.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Normalized finite-simple input and dual test functions have coefficientwise entire bounded-strip families with boundary norms one Finite simple analytic families and their exact endpoint norms.

[F2]

Complex Holder bounds bilinear integrals and the quotient norms are homogeneous Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm.

[F3]

Finite sums of integrable complex functions can be integrated termwise The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ).

[F4]

Finite sums and products of entire functions are entire Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives.

[F5]

A bounded continuous closed-strip function holomorphic inside satisfies the geometric bound at every interior line, including zero boundary bounds Hadamard three-lines theorem.

[F6]

On a sigma-finite measure space bounded finite-simple dual tests prove Lq membership and recover the norm, including q=infinity Complex Lq norm recovery from finite simple dual tests.

[F7]

Integrating a lower bound by a constant times an indicator gives the corresponding bound on its measure Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral.

[F8]

Finite unions of finite-measure level sets have finite measure Finite and countable subadditivity of measures.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

1.1

Fix an interior theta and write p,q for its exponents and r for the conjugate of q. If f is zero as a class, linearity gives Tf=0. Otherwise replace f by f/fp. For a nonzero finite simple dual test replace g by g/gr; zero tests already have zero integral. These normalizations are legal for nonzero finite simple classes of finite-measure support. The families in F1 then have input boundary norms one and dual boundary norms one, including the constant family when r=infinity.

F1F2given
2.1

Write fz=jaj(z)1Ej and gz=kbk(z)1Fk. Put hj=T1Ej. The endpoint hypothesis puts each hj in both target endpoint spaces. Endpoint Holder with 1Fk, which belongs to every conjugate space because its support has finite measure, proves Ijk=hj1Fkdν finite. Linearity gives H(z)=(Tfz)gzdν=j,kaj(z)bk(z)Ijk. This is a finite sum of products of entire coefficients, so it is entire and continuous on the closed strip. Their strip bounds and the finite constants Ijk give a uniform bound for H on that whole strip.

F1F2F3F4step 1.1
3.1

On each boundary line {0,1}, Holder and the endpoint operator bound yield H(+it)Tf+itqg+itrM. The precise closed-strip three-lines theorem therefore gives (Tf)g=H(θ)M01θM1θ. It also applies when an M vanishes, because theta is interior and both powers are positive.

F2F5step 1.1step 2.1
3.2

For arbitrary measure spaces with finite q0,q1, choose representatives of the finitely many hj and let Y0=j,m1{hj>1/m}. For each j,m, mq0ν{hj>1/m}hjq0<. Thus each level set has finite measure, and their countable union is sigma-finite (finite unions give an increasing exhaustion). All the chosen hj, hence the finite-sum representative of every Tfz, vanish off Y0. The restricted measure and its measurable sets satisfy the same endpoint bounds.

F7F8step 2.1
4.1

For any unnormalized test s with sr1, either it is the zero class or scaling the estimate for its norm-one version gives (Tf)sM01θM1θ. Every such product is integrable by the endpoint Holder calculation. On sigma-finite Y the membership form of the dual-test lemma now proves TfLq and bounds its norm. Scaling f back proves the desired estimate. No step assumed intermediate target membership before this test.

F2F6step 1.1step 3.1
5.1

Apply steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 with dual tests on Y0, extended by zero to Y. Their integrals and norms are unchanged, and membership on Y0 gives membership on Y because Tf vanishes off Y0. The argument used only the finitely many source fibers, not source sigma-finiteness. If Y0 is empty, Tf is zero and the estimate holds directly. The endpoint parameters are exactly the original hypotheses.

F6step 4.1step 3.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources