Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Residues of p over q at a simple zero of q

Statement

Let p and q be holomorphic near a, and suppose q(a)=0 and q′(a)≠0. Then

Res⁡ ⁣(pq,a)=p(a)q′(a).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Holomorphic functions p and q near a, with q(a)=0 and q′(a)≠0.

[L1]

If a function has a simple pole at a, its residue is the limit of (z−a)f(z) (At a simple pole the residue is the limit of (z-a)f(z)).

[L2]

A function continuous at a and holomorphic off a is holomorphic at a (A continuous function holomorphic off a single point is holomorphic).

[L3]

Holomorphic functions are continuous, and quotient and reciprocal rules hold where the denominator is nonzero (Complex differentiability at a point implies continuity there, Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL2

Define h(z):={q(z)z−a,z≠a,q′(a),z=a. Because q′(a)=lim⁡z→a(q(z)−q(a))/(z−a) and q(a)=0, the function h is continuous at a and holomorphic away from a; [L2] therefore makes h holomorphic near a.

2.1step 1.1L3

Step 1.1 gives q(z)=(z−a)h(z) and h(a)=q′(a)≠0, so shrinking the neighbourhood if necessary makes h nonzero there. Hence k:=p/h is holomorphic near a by [L3], and on the punctured neighbourhood one has (p/q)(z)=k(z)/(z−a).

2.2step 1.1L2L3

If p(a)=0, define s(z):={p(z)z−a,z≠a,p′(a),z=a. The same argument as in step 1.1, using that p is holomorphic and p(a)=0, shows that s is holomorphic near a. Then step 1.1 gives p(z)q(z)=(z−a)s(z)(z−a)h(z)=s(z)h(z) on the punctured neighbourhood, so p/q is holomorphic at a and its residue there is 0=p(a)/q′(a).

3.1step 2.1L1L3

If p(a)≠0, then k(a)=p(a)/h(a)≠0, so step 2.1 makes p/q a simple pole at a. Applying [L1] gives Res⁡ ⁣(pq,a)=lim⁡z→a(z−a)p(z)q(z)=lim⁡z→ak(z)=k(a)=p(a)q′(a).

4.1step 3.1step 2.2∎

Steps 3.1 and 2.2 cover the cases p(a)≠0 and p(a)=0, so in all cases Res⁡ ⁣(pq,a)=p(a)q′(a).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources