How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
At a simple pole the residue is the limit of (z-a)f(z)
Statement
If is a simple pole of , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A simple pole of at .
A simple pole is a pole of order (Simple poles).
If is a pole of order , then extends holomorphically across with a nonzero value there (Characterizations of poles).
The residue is the coefficient of in the Laurent expansion (The residue of an isolated singularity).
Holomorphic functions are continuous (Complex differentiability at a point implies continuity there).
Proof
By [L1] and [L2], extends holomorphically across ; write the extension again as , so is defined and by [L4].
The Laurent expansion of is , because a simple pole has no terms with . Multiplying by gives , so by [L3].
Combining steps 1.1 and 1.2 gives .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Baptiste Campesato, MAT334 course page and notes index (standard reference, not scraped)