How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The chain rule for complex derivatives
Statement
Let and , where are open. If is complex differentiable at and is complex differentiable at , then is complex differentiable at and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The maps, domains, point, and differentiability hypotheses in the Statement.
Complex differentiability at a point is equivalent to real total differentiability with total derivative given by multiplication by the complex derivative (Complex differentiability is equivalent to real total differentiability together with a complex-linear derivative, with , or with the Cauchy–Riemann equations).
If is totally differentiable at and is totally differentiable at , then (The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
Proof
By [L1], is multiplication by and is multiplication by .
By [L2], is real totally differentiable and its derivative is the composite of the maps in step 1.1, namely multiplication by .
Applying the reverse implication of [L1] gives complex differentiability of and the asserted derivative.
Depends on
Used by
- A holomorphic logarithm is a primitive of the logarithmic derivative Corollary
- A nonvanishing holomorphic function on such a domain has holomorphic roots of every positive order Corollary
- Holomorphic roots of a nonvanishing function on a disc Corollary
- The normalized Riemann map is unique Corollary
- Agreement accumulating only at the boundary does not force a holomorphic identity Counterexample
- log|z| has no global harmonic conjugate on C{0 Counterexample
- Morera proves holomorphy of z↦∫₀¹ tᶻ dt on Rez>1 Example
- FALSE: boundary control alone gives the maximum principle on an unbounded domain False statement
- FALSE: existence of partial derivatives satisfying Cauchy–Riemann everywhere on an open set implies holomorphy False statement
- A nonvanishing holomorphic function on a disc has a holomorphic logarithm Lemma
- Finite simple analytic families and their exact endpoint norms Lemma
- Maximum principle on a closed strip for bounded holomorphic functions Lemma
- The unit-disc estimate for Weierstrass elementary factors Lemma
- Zero free entire function of exponential type is an exponential Lemma
- A bounded harmonic function near an isolated puncture extends harmonically Theorem
- A nonvanishing holomorphic function on a homologically simply connected domain has a holomorphic logarithm Theorem
- A plane domain is homologically simply connected exactly when every harmonic function has a global conjugate Theorem
- Equivalent characterisations of a homologically simply connected domain Theorem
- Hadamard three-lines theorem Theorem
- Holomorphic inverse function theorem and local-degree criterion Theorem
- Plane harmonicity is preserved by holomorphic and antiholomorphic changes of coordinate Theorem
- Power maps are biholomorphisms on sectors of width less than 2π/n Theorem
- Schwarz-Pick lemma on the unit disc Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Proposition 2.2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Orloff, MIT 18.04 Topic 2, §2.6.1 (standard reference, not scraped)