Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A holomorphic logarithm is a primitive of the logarithmic derivative

Statement

Let UC be open and let L,h:UC be holomorphic with exp(L(z))=h(z) for every zU. Then h is nowhere zero on U and

L(z)=h(z)h(z)(zU).

In particular, if pC, if U misses p, and if L is holomorphic on U with exp(L(z))=zp for every zU, then L(z)=1/(zp) on U.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open UC and holomorphic L,h:UC with expL=h.

[L1]

The complex exponential is entire and exp(z)=expz for every zC (The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself).

[L2]

If f:UV is complex differentiable at a and g:VC is complex differentiable at f(a), then (gf)(a)=g(f(a))f(a) (The chain rule for complex derivatives).

[L3]

Linear combinations and products of functions complex differentiable at a point are complex differentiable there, with the usual formulas; if g(a)0 then (f/g)(a)=(f(a)g(a)f(a)g(a))/g(a)2; every constant function has derivative 0 and the identity function has derivative 1 (Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives).

[L4]

For real x,y, exp(x+iy)=ex(cosy+isiny) and exp(x+iy)=ex (exp(x+iy)=ex(cosy+isiny), exp(x+iy)=ex, and eiπ+1=0).

[L5]

A function is holomorphic on an open U when it is complex differentiable at every point of U (Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every vC, writing v=x+iy with x,y real, [L4] gives expv=ex>0, so exp never vanishes; hence h=expL is nowhere zero on U.

givenL4
1.2

By [L5] both L and h are complex differentiable at every point of U, and [L1] and [L2] give (expL)(z)=exp(L(z))L(z) there.

givenL1L2L5
2.1

Since expL=h as functions on U, step 1.2 says h(z)=h(z)L(z) for every zU; dividing by the nonzero h(z) of step 1.1 gives L(z)=h(z)/h(z).

givenstep 1.1step 1.2algebra
3.1

If U misses p and h(z)=zp on U, then h(z)=1 by [L3], so step 2.1 gives L(z)=1/(zp) on U.

step 2.1L3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources