Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 2 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full by a delegated reviewing agent on the owner's instruction; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Morse Functions Critical Values and Genericity

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page turns the local Morse vocabulary from the previous page into global genericity statements. The first bridge identifies the Morse condition with transversality of the differential section to the zero section of the cotangent bundle, which is the form needed for genericity and parameter arguments.

The compact and noncompact regimes are kept separate on purpose. On a compact manifold the Morse and excellent Morse functions are open dense in the C2 topology, while on an arbitrary noncompact manifold the honest global statement is residuality in the strong smooth topology. The page closes with the existence of proper Morse exhaustions, so later noncompact pages can use Morse theory without pretending compactness.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-05Open item page →

A smooth function is Morse if and only if its differential section is transverse to the zero section

Statement

Let M be a smooth manifold and let f:M→R be smooth. Then f is a Morse function if and only if the smooth section df:M→T∗M is transverse to the zero section of the cotangent bundle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M and a smooth function f:M→R.

[F1]

At a critical point p, the Hessian Hess⁡p(f) is the intrinsic symmetric bilinear form defined from the second coordinate derivatives, and p is nondegenerate exactly when that bilinear form has zero nullity (The intrinsic Hessian of a smooth function at a critical point, Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex).

[L1]

A smooth map is transverse to an embedded submanifold exactly when its differential plus the target tangent space spans the ambient tangent space, and the zero section is an embedded submanifold of T∗M (A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold, The zero section is a smooth embedding).

[A1]

In local coordinates x=(x1,…,xn) near p, if g=f∘x−1 and a=x(p), then the cotangent-bundle coordinates identify df with x↦(x,∂1g(x),…,∂ng(x)), and the induced map on the fibre quotient along the zero section is multiplication by the Hessian matrix (∂i∂jg(a)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenA1

The zero set of the section df is exactly the critical set of f, because dfp=0 means that the differential of f vanishes at p. Thus transversality to the zero section is vacuous away from the critical points.

2.1F1A1step 1.1algebra

Fix a critical point p. By [A1], in cotangent-bundle coordinates centered at 0p the derivative of df at p induces on the fibre quotient exactly the Hessian matrix of f at p. Therefore that quotient map is surjective if and only if Hess⁡p(f) is nondegenerate in the sense of [F1].

3.1L1step 2.1

By [L1], df is transverse to the zero section at p if and only if that quotient map is surjective. Combining this with step 2.1 shows that df is transverse to the zero section at p if and only if p is a nondegenerate critical point of f.

4.1F1step 1.1step 3.1∎

Since the only points at which transversality needs checking are the critical points from step 1.1, step 3.1 proves that df is transverse to the zero section exactly when every critical point of f is nondegenerate. By [F1], that is exactly the Morse condition.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Every smooth function admits arbitrarily fine strong-topology perturbations whose differential is transverse to zero, supported away from a closed set where transversality already holds

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let M be a smooth manifold, let f:M→R be smooth, and let A⊆M be closed. Assume that df is transverse to the zero section on an open neighbourhood of A. Then every neighbourhood of f in the strong C∞ topology contains a smooth function g such that:

  • g−f is supported in M∖A;
  • g=f on some open neighbourhood of A; and
  • dg is transverse to the zero section of T∗M.

Equivalently, every strong neighbourhood of f contains a Morse function that agrees with f near A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M, a smooth function f:M→R, a closed set A⊆M, an open neighbourhood V of A on which df is transverse to the zero section, and a chosen strong smooth neighbourhood U of f.

[F1]

A smooth function is Morse exactly when its differential section is transverse to the zero section (A smooth function is Morse if and only if its differential section is transverse to the zero section).

[L1]

The zero section is an embedded submanifold, parametric transversality makes the bad parameter set null for a transverse family, and a null subset of a positive-dimensional parameter manifold has dense complement (The zero section is a smooth embedding, Parametric transversality, A null set has dense complement in a positive-dimensional manifold).

[L2]

Smooth bump functions exist on prescribed compact subsets inside open sets, and locally finite sums of smooth functions are smooth (A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set, A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth).

[L3]

Every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper exhaustion function (Every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper exhaustion function).

[A1]

A basic strong neighbourhood of f is determined by uniform bounds for finitely many derivatives on each member of a locally finite compact family. The derivative order and tolerance may vary from one member to another. Consequently one may choose a finite order rn and a sufficiently small derivative bound on each shell so that every locally finite perturbation satisfying all the shell bounds stays inside U.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL3A1choose

Choose an open set W with A⊆W and W‾⊆V. By [L3], fix a smooth proper exhaustion h:M→[0,∞), set K−1=K0:=∅, and for n≥1 let Kn:=h−1([0,n]). Using [A1], choose integers rn≥n+1 and positive tolerances εn so small that whenever smooth functions un satisfy supp⁡(un)⊆(int⁡Kn+1∖Kn−1)∖W‾ and ∥un∥Crn(Kn+1)<εn for every n, the locally finite sum u:=∑nun gives f+u∈U. The varying orders rn dominate every derivative order imposed by the chosen strong neighbourhood on the corresponding shell.

2.1L2step 1.1givenconstruct

Construct inductively gn so that g0=f, the correction un:=gn−gn−1 has the support and size prescribed in step 1.1, and dgn is transverse to the zero section on a neighbourhood of W‾∪Kn. Suppose gn−1 has been chosen. The set Cn where dgn−1 is not transverse on Kn is compact. If Cn=∅, put un:=0 and gn:=gn−1; openness of the transversality locus gives the required neighbourhood of Kn, so all the inductive conditions hold. Hence assume that Cn is nonempty. It is disjoint from both W‾ and Kn−1: on W‾ every earlier correction vanishes and df is transverse, while transversality near Kn−1 is the inductive hypothesis. Thus Cn has a finite coordinate cover whose chart closures lie in (int⁡Kn+1∖Kn−1)∖W‾. Using [L2], choose bump-supported coordinate functions ϕi on these charts so that their differentials span every cotangent fibre on a neighbourhood of Cn. The resulting parameter space is positive-dimensional: a nontransverse point cannot occur when dim⁡M=0, and a nonempty coordinate cover in positive dimension supplies at least one coordinate function.

3.1L1step 2.1choose

In the nonempty case of step 2.1, consider the finite-dimensional family gn−1,a:=gn−1+∑iaiϕi. On a neighbourhood of Cn, its parameter derivatives span the cotangent fibres. On the compact remainder of Kn, the section dgn−1 is already transverse, so after restricting to a sufficiently small parameter ball, transversality there persists for every parameter. Hence the total family is transverse to the zero section on a neighbourhood of Kn. By [L1], the bad slice parameters form a null set; because the parameter ball is positive-dimensional, its complement is dense. Choose an in that complement and close enough to 0 that un:=∑i(an)iϕi satisfies the bound in step 1.1. Put gn:=gn−1+un. Transversality is open, so dgn is transverse on a neighbourhood of Kn, and it still agrees with df near W‾. Together with the empty case handled in step 2.1, this completes the induction.

4.1L2step 1.1step 3.1

The shell supports are locally finite, so [L2] makes u:=∑n≥1un smooth. Put g:=f+u. Step 1.1 gives g∈U. Every correction is supported outside W‾, so g=f on the neighbourhood W of A and g−f is supported in M∖A. Fix p∈M and choose n with p∈Kn. Step 3.1 makes dgn+1 transverse near p, while every um with m≥n+2 has support disjoint from Kn and therefore vanishes near p. Thus g agrees near p with gn+1, so dg is transverse there. Since p was arbitrary, dg is transverse everywhere.

5.1F1step 4.1∎

By [F1], the final function g is Morse. This proves the relative strong-topology density statement.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

In the strong C∞ topology on C∞(M,R), the Morse functions form a residual subset

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let M be a smooth manifold. In the strong C∞ topology on C∞(M,R), the set of Morse functions is residual.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

A smooth function is Morse exactly when its differential section is transverse to the zero section (A smooth function is Morse if and only if its differential section is transverse to the zero section).

[L1]

Under countable choice, every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper exhaustion function (Every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper exhaustion function). The assumed Axiom of Choice supplies countable choice.

[L2]

Under the Axiom of Choice, every strong neighbourhood of a smooth function contains a Morse perturbation, and that perturbation can be chosen to agree with the original function near any prescribed closed region where transversality already holds (Every smooth function admits arbitrarily fine strong-topology perturbations whose differential is transverse to zero, supported away from a closed set where transversality already holds).

[A1]

For a fixed compact set K, the condition that a differential section be transverse to the zero section on a neighbourhood of K is open in the strong topology, because only finitely many first derivatives on a compact neighbourhood of K are involved.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1L1givenconstruct

By [L1], choose a smooth proper exhaustion h:M→[0,∞) and write Kn:=h−1([0,n]). For each n≥1, let On be the set of smooth functions g such that dg is transverse to the zero section on some open neighbourhood of Kn. If g is Morse, then [F1] gives g∈On for every n. Conversely, if g∈⋂nOn, then every point of M lies in some Kn, so dg is transverse near that point; [F1] then makes g Morse. Thus the Morse functions are exactly ⋂n≥1On.

2.1A1step 1.1

Each On is open by [A1].

2.2L2step 1.1

Each On is dense. Indeed, given any smooth function f and any strong neighbourhood U of f, [L2] produces a Morse function g∈U, and step 1.1 shows that every Morse function belongs to every On.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2∎

Step 1.1 identifies the Morse functions with a countable intersection of the open dense sets On from steps 2.1 and 2.2. Therefore the Morse functions form a residual subset of C∞(M,R) in the strong topology.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05Open item page →

On a compact manifold, a Morse function has finitely many critical points and a uniform Hessian gap on disjoint critical neighborhoods

Statement

Let M be a compact smooth manifold and let f:M→R be Morse. Then f has finitely many critical points p1,…,pr, and one can choose pairwise disjoint coordinate neighbourhoods Ui of pi and a constant η>0 such that:

  • in the chosen chart on Ui, every Hessian matrix Hi(x) of f on Ui‾ satisfies ∥Hi(x)v∥≥2η∥v∥ for every coordinate vector v; and
  • every smooth function g that is sufficiently C2-close to f on Ui‾ has exactly one critical point in Ui, and that critical point is nondegenerate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact smooth manifold M and a Morse function f:M→R.

[F1]

Every critical point of a Morse function is nondegenerate, and a smooth function is Morse exactly when all of its critical points are nondegenerate (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions, A smooth function is Morse if and only if its differential section is transverse to the zero section).

[L1]

A Morse function on a compact manifold has finitely many critical points (A Morse function on a compact manifold has finitely many critical points).

[L2]

A C1 map between Euclidean open sets with invertible derivative at a point is a local diffeomorphism near that point (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1givenchoose

By [L1], the critical set of f is finite; write it as {p1,…,pr}. Choose pairwise disjoint coordinate charts φi:Ui′→Bi⊆Rni with φi(pi)=0, and then shrink to relatively compact subcharts Ui⋐Ui′ that are still pairwise disjoint.

2.1step 1.1cases

If r=0, take η:=1; there are no neighbourhood conditions to check, so the conclusion is vacuous. If instead dim⁡M=0, then M is discrete and each Ui:={pi} is a coordinate neighbourhood. Again take η:=1. The displayed matrix inequality is vacuous on the zero vector space, every point is critical and nondegenerate, and every function on Ui has exactly the one critical point pi. Thus the conclusion holds in either boundary case. Henceforth assume r≥1 and dim⁡M≥1.

2.2F1L2step 1.1

Write Fi:=∇(f∘φi−1) on Bi. Since pi is nondegenerate by [F1], the derivative DFi(0) is the Hessian matrix at pi and is invertible. By [L2], after shrinking Ui again we may assume Fi is a diffeomorphism from φi(Ui) onto an open neighbourhood of 0.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2choosealgebra

Continuity of the Hessian matrices on the compact closures Ui‾ lets us shrink the Ui so that every Hessian matrix Hi(x) of f on Ui‾ stays within half the least singular value of DFi(0). Hence there is ηi>0 such that ∥Hi(x)v∥≥2ηi∥v∥ for all x∈Ui‾ and all coordinate vectors v. Let η:=min⁡iηi>0.

4.1L2step 2.2step 3.1

If g is sufficiently C2-close to f on Ui‾, then the gradient map ∇(g∘φi−1) is C1-close to Fi. Because Fi is a local diffeomorphism carrying 0 to 0 and the Hessian gap from step 3.1 keeps the derivative uniformly invertible on Ui‾, the inverse-function argument persists under sufficiently small C1 perturbation: the perturbed gradient has a unique zero in φi(Ui), and at that zero its derivative is still invertible. Thus g has exactly one nondegenerate critical point in Ui.

5.1step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Steps 1.1, 3.1, and 4.1 give the claimed finite critical set, disjoint critical neighbourhoods, uniform Hessian gap, and local persistence statement.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-05Open item page →

Away from fixed critical neighborhoods, sufficiently small C1 perturbations create no new critical points on a compact manifold

Statement

Let M be a compact smooth manifold, let f:M→R be Morse, and let U1,…,Ur be pairwise disjoint critical neighbourhoods as in On a compact manifold, a Morse function has finitely many critical points and a uniform Hessian gap on disjoint critical neighborhoods. Then there is δ>0 such that every smooth function g with ∥dg−df∥C0<δ on M∖⋃iUi has no critical points in M∖⋃iUi.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact smooth manifold M, a Morse function f:M→R, and pairwise disjoint critical neighbourhoods U1,…,Ur for the critical points of f.

[F1]

A critical point of a smooth function is precisely a zero of its differential (Critical points and critical values of a smooth function).

[A1]

On a compact set, the norm of a continuous cotangent vector field attains its minimum.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1L1given

By [L1], the compact set K:=M∖⋃iUi contains no critical point of f. Hence [F1] gives dfx≠0 for every x∈K.

2.1A1step 1.1choose

By [A1], the continuous function x↦∥dfx∥ attains a positive minimum m on K. Put δ:=m/2.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

If g satisfies ∥dg−df∥C0<δ on K, then for every x∈K one has ∥dgx∥≥∥dfx∥−∥dgx−dfx∥>m−δ=δ>0. Therefore dgx≠0 on K, so [F1] shows that g has no critical point in K.

4.1step 3.1∎

Since K=M∖⋃iUi, this says that sufficiently small C1 perturbations create no new critical points outside the chosen critical neighbourhoods.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

On a compact smooth manifold, the Morse functions form an open dense subset in the C2 and hence C∞ topology

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let M be a compact smooth manifold. Then the Morse functions M→R form an open dense subset of C∞(M,R) in the C2 topology. Consequently they also form an open dense subset in the C∞ topology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a compact smooth manifold M.

[L2]

A compact Morse function has finitely many critical points with disjoint neighbourhoods carrying a uniform Hessian gap, and sufficiently small C2 perturbations have exactly one nondegenerate critical point in each such neighbourhood (On a compact manifold, a Morse function has finitely many critical points and a uniform Hessian gap on disjoint critical neighborhoods).

[L3]

On the compact complement of those neighbourhoods, sufficiently small C1 perturbations create no new critical points (Away from fixed critical neighborhoods, sufficiently small C1 perturbations create no new critical points on a compact manifold).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

Use the assumed Axiom of Choice to apply the conditional density theorem [L1] (with the closed set empty): given any smooth function and any C∞ neighbourhood of it, there is a Morse function in that neighbourhood. Since the C∞ topology is finer than the C2 topology on the same compact manifold, this already implies density in the C2 topology as well.

1.2L2L3givenchoose

Let f be Morse. Apply [L2] to choose pairwise disjoint critical neighbourhoods U1,…,Ur for the critical points of f, with the stated persistence and Hessian-gap properties. Apply [L3] to the complement M∖⋃iUi. Then every function g sufficiently close to f in the C2 topology has exactly one critical point in each Ui, all those critical points are nondegenerate by [L2], and there are no further critical points outside the Ui by [L3].

2.1step 1.2

Therefore every critical point of such a nearby function g is nondegenerate. Hence g is Morse. This proves that the Morse functions are open in the C2 topology.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Combining steps 1.1 and 2.1 gives that the Morse functions form an open dense subset in the C2 topology. Because the identity map from the C∞ topology to the C2 topology is continuous on a compact source, the same set is also open and dense in the C∞ topology.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

For a compact Morse function, disjoint local bump perturbations can separate finitely many equal critical values without changing the Hessians

Statement

Let M be a compact smooth manifold and let f:M→R be Morse. Then every C∞ neighbourhood U of f contains a smooth function g such that:

  • g has the same critical points as f;
  • the Hessian of g at each critical point equals the Hessian of f there; and
  • distinct critical points of g have distinct critical values.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact smooth manifold M, a Morse function f:M→R, and a C∞ neighbourhood U of f.

[L1]

A Morse function on a compact manifold has finitely many critical points (A Morse function on a compact manifold has finitely many critical points).

[L2]

Around a compact set inside an open set there exists a smooth bump that is identically 1 near the compact set and supported in the open set (A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set).

[A1]

If a continuous cotangent field is nowhere zero on a compact set, then its norm has a positive minimum there.

[A2]

For finitely many fixed smooth bump functions, the linear combination map from the coefficient space into C∞(M) is continuous. Hence sufficiently small coefficients place that combination inside any prescribed C∞ neighbourhood of 0, and at the same time make its differential uniformly small on a chosen compact set.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2givenchoose

By [L1], the critical points of f are p1,…,pr. Choose pairwise disjoint open neighbourhoods Vi⋐Ui of the pi such that each Ui contains no critical point other than pi, and by [L2] choose smooth functions ρi with ρi=1 on Vi and supp⁡(ρi)⊆Ui.

2.1A1A2step 1.1givenchooseconstruct

Let K:=M∖⋃i=1rVi. This compact set contains no critical point of f. If K≠∅, [A1] gives m>0 with ∥dfx∥≥m for every x∈K; if K=∅, choose any m>0 and read the differential bound below as vacuous. Using [A2], choose real numbers λi such that the shifted numbers f(pi)+λi are pairwise distinct, the finite sum u:=∑i=1rλiρi satisfies f+u∈U, and, when K≠∅, ∑i∣λi∣ ∥dρi∥C0(K)<m/2. Define g:=f+u.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

On each neighbourhood Vi one has g=f+λi, because ρi=1 there and every ρj with j≠i vanishes there. Therefore pi is still a critical point of g, and the Hessian of g at pi equals the Hessian of f there.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

For x∈K, step 2.1 gives ∥dgx−dfx∥≤∑i∣λi∣ ∥dρi∥C0(K)<m/2, so ∥dgx∥≥∥dfx∥−∥dgx−dfx∥>m/2>0. Hence g has no critical point on K. Since every critical point of f lies in some Vi, step 3.1 shows that the critical set of g is exactly {p1,…,pr}.

5.1step 2.1step 4.1

The critical values of g are g(pi)=f(pi)+λi, which are pairwise distinct by step 2.1. The same step also gives g∈U. Therefore g has the same critical points and Hessians as f, while all of its critical values are distinct.

6.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

Thus one can separate all repeated critical values by disjoint local perturbations without changing any critical Hessian.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

On a compact smooth manifold, the excellent Morse functions form an open dense subset of the C2 and hence C∞ topology

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let M be a compact smooth manifold. Then the excellent Morse functions form an open dense subset of C∞(M,R) in the C2 topology, and hence also in the C∞ topology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a compact smooth manifold M.

[F1]

An excellent Morse function is a Morse function whose distinct critical points have distinct critical values (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions).

[L2]

Every C∞ neighbourhood of a compact Morse function contains a local perturbation whose critical values are pairwise distinct and whose critical Hessians are unchanged (For a compact Morse function, disjoint local bump perturbations can separate finitely many equal critical values without changing the Hessians).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1L1L2given

To prove density, let U be a C∞ neighbourhood of an arbitrary smooth function f. Using the assumed Axiom of Choice to apply [L1], choose a Morse function h∈U. Because U is itself a C∞ neighbourhood of the compact Morse function h, [L2] yields a function g∈U with the same critical points and Hessians as h, but with pairwise distinct critical values. By [F1], this g is excellent Morse.

1.2F1L3givenchoose

Let f be excellent Morse. By [L3], choose pairwise disjoint critical neighbourhoods U1,…,Ur around the critical points p1,…,pr of f such that every sufficiently small C2 perturbation has exactly one nondegenerate critical point in each Ui and none outside ⋃iUi. Because the critical values f(pi) are pairwise distinct, choose pairwise disjoint open intervals Ii with f(pi)∈Ii and f(Ui)⊆Ii.

2.1F1step 1.2algebra

If g is sufficiently close to f in the C2 topology, then step 1.2 gives exactly one critical point qi of g in each Ui and no others. The C0 closeness keeps g(qi) inside the same interval Ii, so the critical values of g are pairwise distinct because the intervals are disjoint. Since each qi is nondegenerate, [F1] shows that g is excellent Morse.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Step 1.1 gives density in the C∞ topology, hence also in the coarser C2 topology, and step 2.1 gives openness in the C2 topology. Every C2-open subset is also C∞-open on a compact manifold, so the same set of excellent Morse functions is open in the C∞ topology as well. Thus the excellent Morse functions are open dense in both topologies.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

For a compact manifold embedded in Euclidean space, the restricted linear height is Morse for generic directions

Statement

Let M⊆RN be a compact embedded smooth manifold.

  • If N=1, then every nonzero linear functional on R restricts to a Morse function on M.
  • If N≥2, then there is a subset E⊆SN−1 that is A-null for every smooth atlas A of SN−1 (Null subsets of a smooth manifold), such that for every u∈SN−1∖E, the height function hu:M→R,hu(x)=u⋅x is Morse.

Thus restricted linear heights are Morse for generic directions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact embedded smooth manifold M⊆RN.

[F1]

A smooth function is Morse exactly when its differential section is transverse to the zero section (A smooth function is Morse if and only if its differential section is transverse to the zero section).

[L1]

The critical values of a smooth Euclidean map are null (Morse-Sard for Euclidean maps); transverse preimages are embedded submanifolds (The transverse preimage theorem).

[L2]

The zero section of the cotangent bundle is an embedded submanifold (The zero section is a smooth embedding). Manifold nullity is chartwise Euclidean nullity (Null subsets of a smooth manifold).

[A1]

For u∈SN−1 and x∈M, the differential of hu at x is the cotangent vector v↦u⋅v on TxM. If d(hu)x=0, then TxM⊆u⊥=TuSN−1, so varying the parameter u in tangent directions to the sphere produces every cotangent vector on TxM.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

If N=1, then every embedded compact submanifold of R is zero-dimensional, hence finite. The restriction of a nonzero linear functional to a finite manifold has all points critical and nondegenerate in the zero-dimensional Morse convention, so it is Morse.

1.2L2A1givenconstruct

Assume now that N≥2. Define a smooth family of cotangent sections by D:M×SN−1→T∗M,D(x,u)=d(hu)x. By [L2], its target zero section is an embedded submanifold. At any zero (x,u), [A1] says that the parameter derivative in tangent directions to SN−1 spans the whole fibre Tx∗M, so D is transverse to the zero section.

2.1F1L1L2step 1.2

Let W=D−1(0T∗M). Since the total family is transverse to the zero section, [L1] makes W an embedded submanifold of dimension N−1. It is closed in the compact space M×SN−1, hence compact. Write π:W→SN−1 for the parameter projection. In local coordinates near (x,u)∈W, the zero condition is H(x,u)=0 for a map to Rdim⁡M whose full derivative is surjective. The tangent space of W is ker⁡dH. The derivative dπ is surjective exactly when for each parameter tangent w there is a source tangent v with dH(v,w)=0. Because the full dH is surjective, this is equivalent to surjectivity of dxH, which is precisely transversality of the slice d(hu) to the zero section. Thus bad directions are exactly the critical values of π.

3.1F1L1L2step 2.1∎

Cover the compact W by finitely many source charts. Fix any smooth target chart ψ:V→RN−1 on the sphere, and restrict each source chart to the open preimage of V. In those finitely many Euclidean coordinates, ψ∘π is smooth and [L1] makes each critical-value image null. Their finite union equals ψ(E∩V) and is null. Since this holds for every target chart, E is null in every smooth atlas directly; no countable atlas or general manifold Sard theorem is needed. Outside E, [F1] makes hu Morse.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

For a compact manifold embedded in Euclidean space, the squared-distance function from a generic center is Morse

Statement

Let M⊆RN be a compact embedded smooth manifold. Then there is a null subset E⊆RN such that for every p∈RN∖E, the squared-distance function dp:M→R,dp(x)=∥x−p∥2 is Morse.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact embedded smooth manifold M⊆RN.

[F1]

A smooth function is Morse exactly when its differential section is transverse to the zero section (A smooth function is Morse if and only if its differential section is transverse to the zero section).

[L1]

The critical values of a smooth Euclidean map U⊆RN→RN form a null set (Morse-Sard for Euclidean maps).

[A1]

In local coordinates x(u) on M, the critical-point equations for dp are (p−x(u))⋅∂ix(u)=0. A smooth orthonormal frame of the Euclidean normal spaces exists locally by finite-dimensional Gram–Schmidt after shrinking a chart.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1given

If dim⁡M=0, compactness makes M finite and every function on it is Morse. Assume m=dim⁡M>0, so N≥1. Compactness supplies finitely many coordinate patches xj:Uj→M on which there are smooth orthonormal normal frames ej,a(u), 1≤a≤N−m. Each critical pair (xj(u),p) satisfies the equations in [A1], hence has a unique representation p=Ψj(u,t):=xj(u)+∑a=1N−mtaej,a(u). Thus the critical-pair manifold over this patch is parametrized by the open Euclidean set Uj×RN−m, and the projection to centers is the smooth map Ψj to RN.

2.1A1F1step 1.1algebra

Put Hi(u,p)=(p−xj(u))⋅∂ixj(u). At a critical pair, the derivative of H=(Hi) in the p direction has rank m, because the tangent vectors ∂ixj are independent. Hence a tangent vector to the critical-pair manifold lies in the kernel of the center projection precisely when DuH(u,p) has a nonzero kernel. But the coordinate gradient of dp is −2H, so its Hessian at that critical point is −2DuH(u,p). Therefore p is a bad center exactly when it is a critical value of at least one of the finitely many maps Ψj.

3.1L1F1step 2.1∎

By [L1], each CritVal⁡(Ψj) is null in RN. Their finite union is null and contains every bad center by step 2.1. Outside it every critical point of dp has nondegenerate Hessian, so dp is Morse. This finite-chart argument does not invoke the countable-choice-qualified manifold parametric theorem.

CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Every compact smooth manifold admits an excellent Morse function

Statement

Assume the axiom of choice. Every compact smooth manifold admits an excellent Morse function.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact smooth manifold M and the axiom of choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[L1]

Under countable choice, every smooth manifold embeds in some finite-dimensional Euclidean space (Every smooth manifold embeds in some finite-dimensional Euclidean space).

[L2]

On a compact embedded manifold, a generic linear height function is Morse (For a compact manifold embedded in Euclidean space, the restricted linear height is Morse for generic directions).

[L3]

On a compact manifold, excellent Morse functions are dense among all smooth functions (On a compact smooth manifold, the excellent Morse functions form an open dense subset of the C2 and hence C∞ topology). Its published density proof uses the relative jet-transversality construction, whose successive perturbation choices are covered here by the assumed axiom of choice.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2givenchoose

Use the assumed axiom of choice for the countable selections in [L1], and choose a smooth embedding M↪RN. Then [L2] gives a Morse height function h:M→R on that embedding.

2.1L3step 1.1

Use the assumed axiom of choice for the successive selections in the density proof underlying [L3], and apply [L3] to the Morse function h. An excellent Morse function then lies arbitrarily close to h and in particular exists on M.

3.1step 2.1∎

Therefore every compact smooth manifold admits an excellent Morse function.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05Open item page →

A locally finite shellwise perturbation with rapidly decaying size preserves properness of a smooth exhaustion

Statement

Let h:M→[0,∞) be a smooth proper function, and for each n≥1 let un:M→R be smooth with supp⁡(un)⊆h−1([n−1,n+2])and∥un∥∞≤2−n−2. Assume the family (supp⁡(un))n≥1 is locally finite. Then the sum u:=∑n≥1un is smooth, and h+u is still proper.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth proper function h:M→[0,∞) and a locally finite shellwise family (un)n≥1 as in the statement.

[L1]

A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth (A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth).

[A1]

The geometric series ∑n≥12−n−2 converges to 1/4.

[A2]

Closed subsets of compact spaces are compact.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

The family of supports is locally finite, so [L1] makes the sum u=∑nun a smooth function.

2.1A1step 1.1algebra

For every x∈M, the pointwise estimate gives ∣u(x)∣≤∑n≥1∣un(x)∣≤∑n≥12−n−2=14 by [A1]. Hence (h+u)(x)≥h(x)−14 for all x.

3.1A2step 2.1givenalgebra

If (h+u)(x)≤c, then step 2.1 gives h(x)≤c+14. Therefore {x:(h+u)(x)≤c}⊆{x:h(x)≤c+14}. The right-hand side is compact because h is proper, and the left-hand side is closed because h+u is continuous. By [A2], the left-hand side is compact.

4.1step 3.1∎

Thus h+u is proper, and the shellwise perturbation preserves properness.

PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Every smooth manifold admits a proper Morse function

Statement

Assume the axiom of choice. Every smooth manifold admits a proper Morse function.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M and the axiom of choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[L1]

Under countable choice, every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper exhaustion function (Every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper exhaustion function). The assumed axiom of choice supplies the countably many selections in its proof.

[L2]

One can perturb a smooth function to a Morse function in an arbitrarily small strong neighbourhood, while fixing any closed region where the differential is already transverse to the zero section (Every smooth function admits arbitrarily fine strong-topology perturbations whose differential is transverse to zero, supported away from a closed set where transversality already holds). The assumed axiom of choice supplies the successive perturbation selections in that theorem's proof.

[F1]

A function is Morse exactly when its differential section is transverse to the zero section (A smooth function is Morse if and only if its differential section is transverse to the zero section).

[A1]

The set of smooth functions g satisfying ∣g(x)−h(x)∣<14 for every x∈M is a strong C∞ neighbourhood of h. Equivalently, proper maps form an open subset in the strong topology, as recorded in the cited Frejlich notes.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1A1givenchoose

Use the assumed axiom of choice for the countable selections in [L1], choose a smooth proper exhaustion h:M→[0,∞), and let U:={g∈C∞(M,R):∣g(x)−h(x)∣<14 for every x∈M}. By [A1], this is a strong neighbourhood of h.

2.1L2step 1.1

Use the assumed axiom of choice for the successive perturbation selections in [L2], and apply [L2] to the function h, the closed set A:=∅, and the strong neighbourhood U. It yields a smooth function g∈U whose differential is transverse to the zero section.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Since g∈U, one has g≥h−14. Thus, for every real c, {x:g(x)≤c}⊆{x:h(x)≤c+14}. The left-hand side is closed and the right-hand side is compact because h is proper, so every sublevel set of g is compact. Also g≥−14, hence the inverse image under g of every compact subset of R is a closed subset of one of these compact sublevel sets. Therefore g is proper. Since step 2.1 gives dg transverse to the zero section everywhere, [F1] makes g Morse.

4.1step 3.1∎

Hence g is a proper Morse function on M.

RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

On a noncompact manifold, this page states Morse genericity as a strong-topology residual theorem

Remark

Assuming the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), the compact theorem and the general theorem package different results.

On a compact manifold, On a compact smooth manifold, the Morse functions form an open dense subset in the C2 and hence C∞ topology gives an open dense subset in the ordinary C2 or C∞ topology. On an arbitrary noncompact manifold, In the strong C∞ topology on C∞(M,R), the Morse functions form a residual subset is the strong-topology theorem proved on this page.

The drifting-shell counterexample below serves a narrower purpose. It shows that perturbations which are tiny only on each fixed compact set can still create new critical points far out at infinity, so that kind of weak control is not a substitute for the strong topology. By itself, that example does not settle any separate openness claim.

RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05Open item page →

Being Morse does not by itself force distinct critical values; excellence is a separate generic condition

Remark

The adjective Morse controls only the Hessians at critical points, not the relative heights of those critical points. By Morse functions and excellent Morse functions, repeated critical values are allowed unless one adds the extra adjective excellent.

The point of For a compact Morse function, disjoint local bump perturbations can separate finitely many equal critical values without changing the Hessians is that on a compact manifold this extra condition is still generic: repeated critical levels can be broken by local perturbations that do not change the critical Hessians.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources