How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every smooth function admits arbitrarily fine strong-topology perturbations whose differential is transverse to zero, supported away from a closed set where transversality already holds
Statement
Let be a smooth manifold, let be smooth, and let be closed. Assume that is transverse to the zero section on an open neighbourhood of . Then every neighbourhood of in the strong topology contains a smooth function such that:
- is supported in ;
- on some open neighbourhood of ; and
- is transverse to the zero section of .
Equivalently, every strong neighbourhood of contains a Morse function that agrees with near .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth manifold , a smooth function , a closed set , an open neighbourhood of on which is transverse to the zero section, and a chosen strong smooth neighbourhood of .
A smooth function is Morse exactly when its differential section is transverse to the zero section (A smooth function is Morse if and only if its differential section is transverse to the zero section).
The zero section is an embedded submanifold, parametric transversality makes the bad parameter set null for a transverse family, and a null subset of a positive-dimensional parameter manifold has dense complement (The zero section is a smooth embedding, Parametric transversality, A null set has dense complement in a positive-dimensional manifold).
Smooth bump functions exist on prescribed compact subsets inside open sets, and locally finite sums of smooth functions are smooth (A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set, A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth).
Every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper exhaustion function (Every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper exhaustion function).
A basic strong neighbourhood of is determined by uniform bounds for finitely many derivatives on each member of a locally finite compact family. The derivative order and tolerance may vary from one member to another. Consequently one may choose a finite order and a sufficiently small derivative bound on each shell so that every locally finite perturbation satisfying all the shell bounds stays inside .
Proof
Choose an open set with and . By [L3], fix a smooth proper exhaustion , set , and for let . Using [A1], choose integers and positive tolerances so small that whenever smooth functions satisfy and for every , the locally finite sum gives . The varying orders dominate every derivative order imposed by the chosen strong neighbourhood on the corresponding shell.
Construct inductively so that , the correction has the support and size prescribed in step 1.1, and is transverse to the zero section on a neighbourhood of . Suppose has been chosen. The set where is not transverse on is compact. If , put and ; openness of the transversality locus gives the required neighbourhood of , so all the inductive conditions hold. Hence assume that is nonempty. It is disjoint from both and : on every earlier correction vanishes and is transverse, while transversality near is the inductive hypothesis. Thus has a finite coordinate cover whose chart closures lie in Using [L2], choose bump-supported coordinate functions on these charts so that their differentials span every cotangent fibre on a neighbourhood of . The resulting parameter space is positive-dimensional: a nontransverse point cannot occur when , and a nonempty coordinate cover in positive dimension supplies at least one coordinate function.
In the nonempty case of step 2.1, consider the finite-dimensional family On a neighbourhood of , its parameter derivatives span the cotangent fibres. On the compact remainder of , the section is already transverse, so after restricting to a sufficiently small parameter ball, transversality there persists for every parameter. Hence the total family is transverse to the zero section on a neighbourhood of . By [L1], the bad slice parameters form a null set; because the parameter ball is positive-dimensional, its complement is dense. Choose in that complement and close enough to that satisfies the bound in step 1.1. Put . Transversality is open, so is transverse on a neighbourhood of , and it still agrees with near . Together with the empty case handled in step 2.1, this completes the induction.
The shell supports are locally finite, so [L2] makes smooth. Put . Step 1.1 gives . Every correction is supported outside , so on the neighbourhood of and is supported in . Fix and choose with . Step 3.1 makes transverse near , while every with has support disjoint from and therefore vanishes near . Thus agrees near with , so is transverse there. Since was arbitrary, is transverse everywhere.
By [F1], the final function is Morse. This proves the relative strong-topology density statement.
Depends on
- A smooth function is Morse if and only if its differential section is transverse to the zero section
- The zero section is a smooth embedding
- Parametric transversality
- A null set has dense complement in a positive-dimensional manifold
- A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set
- A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth
- Every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper exhaustion function
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Marco Gualtieri, Topology I: Smooth Manifolds, Part 10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Shintaro Fushida-Hardy, Morse theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- Chris Wendl, Functional Analysis lecture notes, Section 10.3 (standard reference, not scraped)