Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

5 results · all verified · 4 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Morse Functions Critical Values and Genericity — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples make the genericity statements concrete. The torus and circle models show how a finite-dimensional parameter can move a function from Morse to degenerate behavior, while the bump-separation example isolates the extra step needed to pass from Morse to excellent Morse.

The two counterexamples mark the sharp boundaries. A Morse function can still have repeated critical values, and on a noncompact manifold tiny perturbations whose supports drift to infinity can create new critical points unless the topology controls the perturbation at infinity strongly enough.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05Open item page →

A standard embedded torus has generic height directions with four Morse critical points, but symmetry directions create degenerate or nongeneric behavior

Example

Let R>r>0 and embed the standard torus by X(u,v)=((R+rcosu)cosv, (R+rcosu)sinv, rsinu). Every nonvertical height direction is Morse with four critical points, while either vertical direction has circles of critical points. Thus the same embedded torus exhibits the generic four-critical-point behaviour and the exceptional symmetry directions explicitly.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard torus embedding X(u,v) with R>r>0.

[F1]

Morse and excellent Morse functions are defined on the A page (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions).

[L1]

Generic directions on a compact embedded manifold give Morse height functions (For a compact manifold embedded in Euclidean space, the restricted linear height is Morse for generic directions).

Verification

technique · direct computation
1.1

Write a unit direction as q=(Acosϕ,Asinϕ,c) with A0 and A2+c2=1. Its height on the torus is hq(u,v)=A(R+rcosu)cos(vϕ)+crsinu. If A>0, then R+rcosu>0 makes the critical-point equations equivalent to sin(vϕ)=0,Asinucos(vϕ)+ccosu=0. For each of the two signs s=cos(vϕ){1,1}, the second equation has exactly two solutions modulo 2π. Hence every nonvertical direction has exactly four critical points.

givenalgebra
2.1

At a critical point from step 1.1 the mixed second derivative vanishes, while the two diagonal Hessian entries are r(Ascosu+csinu),As(R+rcosu). The first has absolute value rA2+c2=r, and the second is nonzero because A>0 and R+rcosu>0. Thus all four critical points are nondegenerate, so every nonvertical height is Morse by [F1]. In particular the x-height is the case (A,c,ϕ)=(1,0,0).

F1step 1.1algebra
2.2

If A=0, then c=±1 and the height is k(u,v)=±rsinu. Its critical set is the union of the two circles u=π/2 and u=3π/2, so both vertical directions are degenerate and not Morse.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The two vertical poles form a null subset of the direction sphere, while every direction in their complement has the four Morse critical points from steps 1.1 and 2.1. This proves directly that generic directions have four critical points and identifies the exceptional symmetry directions, consistently with [L1].

L1step 2.1step 2.2
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05Open item page →

Squared distance to a circle is Morse for centers off the medial axis and degenerate at the center

Example

On the unit circle S1R2, the squared-distance function from a center p=(a,b) is Morse for every p0, while at the center it is constant and therefore maximally degenerate. For this example, the medial axis is just the single point 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The unit circle S1R2 and a center p=(a,b)R2.

[L1]

Generic centers give Morse squared-distance functions on a compact embedded manifold (For a compact manifold embedded in Euclidean space, the squared-distance function from a generic center is Morse).

Verification

technique · direct computation
1.1

Parametrize the circle by x(θ)=(cosθ,sinθ). Then dp(θ)=x(θ)p2=1+a2+b22(acosθ+bsinθ). Therefore dp(θ)=2(asinθbcosθ)anddp(θ)=2(acosθ+bsinθ).

givenalgebra
2.1

If p0, the equation asinθ=bcosθ has exactly two solutions modulo 2π, corresponding to the two points where the radius through p meets the circle. At those two points one has dp(θ)=±2a2+b20, so both critical points are nondegenerate and dp is Morse. This matches the generic-center theorem [L1].

L1step 1.1algebra
2.2

If p=0, then d0(θ)1 is constant. Every point of the circle is critical, so the function is degenerate and not Morse.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Thus centers off the medial axis yield Morse squared-distance functions, while the center itself is the exceptional degenerate case.

step 2.1step 2.2
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-05Open item page →

Two equal critical levels can be separated by adding disjoint bump perturbations near the corresponding critical points

Example

On the flat torus T2=R2/Z2, the Morse function f([x],[y])=cos(2πx)+cos(2πy) has two saddle points at the common critical value 0. Choosing disjoint bump functions near those saddles and adding opposite tiny constants separates the two critical levels while leaving the Hessians unchanged.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The torus function f([x],[y])=cos(2πx)+cos(2πy).

[F1]

Morse and excellent Morse functions have the meanings fixed on the A page (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions).

[L1]

Repeated critical values of a compact Morse function can be separated by disjoint local bump perturbations without changing the critical Hessians (For a compact Morse function, disjoint local bump perturbations can separate finitely many equal critical values without changing the Hessians).

Verification

technique · direct construction
1.1

The partial derivatives are f/x=2πsin(2πx) and f/y=2πsin(2πy), so the critical points are exactly the four points with x,y{0,12} modulo Z. At the two saddles (0,12) and (12,0) the critical value is 0.

givenalgebra
2.1

The Hessian is diagonal with entries 4π2cos(2πx) and 4π2cos(2πy), so all four critical points are nondegenerate. By [F1], f is Morse. Choose pairwise disjoint neighbourhoods of the two saddles and bump functions ρ1,ρ2 that are identically 1 near the corresponding saddle and supported away from the other one.

F1step 1.1choosealgebra
3.1

For sufficiently small ε>0, define g:=f+ερ1ερ2. The compact perturbation argument from [L1] applies to these two fixed bumps: for small enough ε, the function g has the same critical points as f and the same Hessians at those critical points. Near the first saddle one has g=f+ε, and near the second one has g=fε, so the two saddle critical values become ε and ε.

L1step 2.1construct
4.1

Hence two equal critical levels can be separated by disjoint bump perturbations without changing the local Hessians.

step 3.1
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05Open item page →

A Morse function can have two different critical points with the same critical value

Statement refuted

Every Morse function has pairwise distinct critical values.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The torus function f([x],[y])=cos(2πx)+cos(2πy) on T2=R2/Z2.

[F1]

Morse and excellent Morse functions differ exactly by whether distinct critical points are allowed to share a critical value (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions).

[L1]

The A-page remark records that Morse does not by itself mean distinct critical values (Being Morse does not by itself force distinct critical values; excellence is a separate generic condition).

Counterexample

technique · direct computation
1.1

The partial derivatives are f/x=2πsin(2πx) and f/y=2πsin(2πy), so the critical points are exactly the four points with x,y{0,12} modulo Z.

givenalgebra
2.1

The Hessian is diagonal with entries 4π2cos(2πx) and 4π2cos(2πy). At each of the four critical points these entries are nonzero, so every critical point is nondegenerate. By [F1], the function f is Morse.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

The two saddle points (0,12) and (12,0) both have critical value 0, so distinct critical points can share one critical level. This is exactly the boundary described in [L1], and by [F1] it shows that f is not excellent. Therefore the displayed universal claim is false.

F1L1step 2.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05Open item page →

Uniformly tiny perturbations on larger and larger shells of a noncompact manifold can create new critical points far out

Statement refuted

On a noncompact manifold, perturbations that are uniformly tiny in value cannot create new critical points far out at infinity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth bump function β:RR supported in [1,1] with β(0)=1, the base function f(x)=x, and the perturbations gn(x)=x+1nβ(n2(xn)).

[L1]

The A-page remark records that compact-set smallness alone is not a substitute for the strong topology on a noncompact manifold, because drifting-shell perturbations can create new critical points far out at infinity (On a noncompact manifold, this page states Morse genericity as a strong-topology residual theorem).

Counterexample

technique · direct construction
1.1

One has gnf1/n, so the perturbations are uniformly tiny in value. Their supports lie in [n1/n2,n+1/n2], hence for every fixed compact set KR one has gn=f on K once n is large enough.

givenalgebra
2.1

Differentiating gives gn(x)=1+nβ(n2(xn)). In particular gn(n)=1+nβ(0)=1n0, with equality only when n=1, while outside the support interval one has gn(x)=1. Thus g1(1)=0, and for every n2 continuity gives some xn[n1/n2,n+1/n2] with gn(xn)=0. Thus each gn has a new critical point near x=n.

step 1.1givenalgebra
3.1

Step 1.1 shows that the perturbations are tiny on every fixed compact set, while step 2.1 shows that they still create new far-out critical points. This is exactly the noncompact failure mode recorded in [L1]. Therefore the displayed claim is false.

L1step 1.1step 2.1

Sources