How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Morse Functions Critical Values and Genericity — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morse Critical Points Hessians and Indices
- Morse Functions Critical Values and Genericity
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sard Theorem and Transversality
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples make the genericity statements concrete. The torus and circle models show how a finite-dimensional parameter can move a function from Morse to degenerate behavior, while the bump-separation example isolates the extra step needed to pass from Morse to excellent Morse.
The two counterexamples mark the sharp boundaries. A Morse function can still have repeated critical values, and on a noncompact manifold tiny perturbations whose supports drift to infinity can create new critical points unless the topology controls the perturbation at infinity strongly enough.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A standard embedded torus has generic height directions with four Morse critical points, but symmetry directions create degenerate or nongeneric behavior
Example
Let and embed the standard torus by Every nonvertical height direction is Morse with four critical points, while either vertical direction has circles of critical points. Thus the same embedded torus exhibits the generic four-critical-point behaviour and the exceptional symmetry directions explicitly.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard torus embedding with .
Morse and excellent Morse functions are defined on the A page (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions).
Generic directions on a compact embedded manifold give Morse height functions (For a compact manifold embedded in Euclidean space, the restricted linear height is Morse for generic directions).
Verification
Write a unit direction as with and . Its height on the torus is If , then makes the critical-point equations equivalent to For each of the two signs , the second equation has exactly two solutions modulo . Hence every nonvertical direction has exactly four critical points.
At a critical point from step 1.1 the mixed second derivative vanishes, while the two diagonal Hessian entries are The first has absolute value , and the second is nonzero because and . Thus all four critical points are nondegenerate, so every nonvertical height is Morse by [F1]. In particular the -height is the case .
If , then and the height is . Its critical set is the union of the two circles and , so both vertical directions are degenerate and not Morse.
The two vertical poles form a null subset of the direction sphere, while every direction in their complement has the four Morse critical points from steps 1.1 and 2.1. This proves directly that generic directions have four critical points and identifies the exceptional symmetry directions, consistently with [L1].
Squared distance to a circle is Morse for centers off the medial axis and degenerate at the center
Example
On the unit circle , the squared-distance function from a center is Morse for every , while at the center it is constant and therefore maximally degenerate. For this example, the medial axis is just the single point .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit circle and a center .
Generic centers give Morse squared-distance functions on a compact embedded manifold (For a compact manifold embedded in Euclidean space, the squared-distance function from a generic center is Morse).
Verification
Parametrize the circle by . Then Therefore
If , the equation has exactly two solutions modulo , corresponding to the two points where the radius through meets the circle. At those two points one has , so both critical points are nondegenerate and is Morse. This matches the generic-center theorem [L1].
If , then is constant. Every point of the circle is critical, so the function is degenerate and not Morse.
Thus centers off the medial axis yield Morse squared-distance functions, while the center itself is the exceptional degenerate case.
Two equal critical levels can be separated by adding disjoint bump perturbations near the corresponding critical points
Example
On the flat torus , the Morse function has two saddle points at the common critical value . Choosing disjoint bump functions near those saddles and adding opposite tiny constants separates the two critical levels while leaving the Hessians unchanged.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The torus function .
Morse and excellent Morse functions have the meanings fixed on the A page (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions).
Repeated critical values of a compact Morse function can be separated by disjoint local bump perturbations without changing the critical Hessians (For a compact Morse function, disjoint local bump perturbations can separate finitely many equal critical values without changing the Hessians).
Verification
The partial derivatives are and , so the critical points are exactly the four points with modulo . At the two saddles and the critical value is .
The Hessian is diagonal with entries and , so all four critical points are nondegenerate. By [F1], is Morse. Choose pairwise disjoint neighbourhoods of the two saddles and bump functions that are identically near the corresponding saddle and supported away from the other one.
For sufficiently small , define The compact perturbation argument from [L1] applies to these two fixed bumps: for small enough , the function has the same critical points as and the same Hessians at those critical points. Near the first saddle one has , and near the second one has , so the two saddle critical values become and .
Hence two equal critical levels can be separated by disjoint bump perturbations without changing the local Hessians.
A Morse function can have two different critical points with the same critical value
Statement refuted
Every Morse function has pairwise distinct critical values.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The torus function on .
Morse and excellent Morse functions differ exactly by whether distinct critical points are allowed to share a critical value (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions).
The A-page remark records that Morse does not by itself mean distinct critical values (Being Morse does not by itself force distinct critical values; excellence is a separate generic condition).
Counterexample
The partial derivatives are and , so the critical points are exactly the four points with modulo .
The Hessian is diagonal with entries and . At each of the four critical points these entries are nonzero, so every critical point is nondegenerate. By [F1], the function is Morse.
The two saddle points and both have critical value , so distinct critical points can share one critical level. This is exactly the boundary described in [L1], and by [F1] it shows that is not excellent. Therefore the displayed universal claim is false.
Uniformly tiny perturbations on larger and larger shells of a noncompact manifold can create new critical points far out
Statement refuted
On a noncompact manifold, perturbations that are uniformly tiny in value cannot create new critical points far out at infinity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth bump function supported in with , the base function , and the perturbations .
The A-page remark records that compact-set smallness alone is not a substitute for the strong topology on a noncompact manifold, because drifting-shell perturbations can create new critical points far out at infinity (On a noncompact manifold, this page states Morse genericity as a strong-topology residual theorem).
Counterexample
One has , so the perturbations are uniformly tiny in value. Their supports lie in , hence for every fixed compact set one has on once is large enough.
Differentiating gives . In particular , with equality only when , while outside the support interval one has . Thus , and for every continuity gives some with . Thus each has a new critical point near .
Step 1.1 shows that the perturbations are tiny on every fixed compact set, while step 2.1 shows that they still create new far-out critical points. This is exactly the noncompact failure mode recorded in [L1]. Therefore the displayed claim is false.