Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Morse Critical Points Hessians and Indices

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page fixes the local Morse-theory vocabulary for smooth real-valued functions. It starts with critical points and the intrinsic critical-point Hessian, inserts the minimal Levi-Civita bridge needed to compare that Hessian with the covariant one, and then defines nondegeneracy, nullity, index, coindex, Morse functions, and excellent Morse functions.

The proof route keeps the local normal-form theorem honest. The Morse lemma is split into a one-variable signed-square lemma and a residual-Hessian lemma before the dimension induction, and the zero-dimensional, index-0, and index-n boundary cases are stated explicitly rather than left implicit.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

Critical points and critical values of a smooth function

Definition

Let f:MR be a smooth function and let pM.

This is the specialization of Regular and critical points and values to real-valued functions: for a map to R, the empty-fibre case is still regular, so a value is critical exactly when it is attained at a critical point.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

The intrinsic Hessian of a smooth function at a critical point

Definition

Let f:MR be smooth, and let pM be a critical point of f (Critical points and critical values of a smooth function).

Choose a smooth chart x=(x1,,xn) around p, write a:=x(p), and let g:=fx1. The matrix

Hx(f,p):=(2gxixj(a))1i,jn

is symmetric, and it defines a bilinear form on TpM by

Hessp(f) ⁣(iuixip,jvjxjp):=i,juivj2gxixj(a).

By Critical-point Hessian matrices transform by congruence under chart changes , this bilinear form is independent of the chosen chart. It is the Hessian of f at p.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedaudited 2026-09-04Open item page →

Critical-point Hessian matrices transform by congruence under chart changes

Statement

Let f:MR be smooth, let p be a critical point of f, and let x and y be smooth charts around p. If

Hx(f,p)=(2(fx1)xixj(x(p))),Hy(f,p)=(2(fy1)yiyj(y(p))),

and if J=D(xy1)y(p), then

Hy(f,p)=JTHx(f,p)J.

In particular the two Hessian matrices are congruent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth function f:MR, a critical point p, and two charts x and y around p.

[F1]

The critical-point Hessian is defined from the second partial derivatives of a coordinate representative at the critical point (The intrinsic Hessian of a smooth function at a critical point).

Proof

technique · coordinate computation
1.1

Write g:=fx1, h:=fy1, a:=x(p), b:=y(p), and ϕ:=xy1. Then h=gϕ, and the matrix J in the statement is Dϕb.

F1givenconstruct
2.1

Because p is critical, the first derivative of g at a is zero, so differentiating h=gϕ twice at b gives D2hb(u,v)=D2ga(Ju,Jv)+Dga(D2ϕb(u,v))=D2ga(Ju,Jv) for all u,vRn.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Step 2.1 is exactly the matrix identity Hy(f,p)=JTHx(f,p)J, so the two chart Hessians are congruent.

F1step 2.1algebra
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

Riemannian metrics, symmetric cotangent-bundle connections, and covariant Hessians

Definition

Let M be a smooth manifold.

  • A Riemannian metric on M is a smooth bundle metric on the tangent bundle TM (Smooth bundle metrics).
  • A cotangent-bundle connection is an R-bilinear assignment (X,α)Xα from smooth vector fields X and smooth one-forms α to smooth one-forms such that hXα=hXα,X(hα)=X(h)α+hXα for every smooth function h.

In a smooth chart x=(x1,,xn), such a connection is determined by its Christoffel symbols Γijk through

xi(dxk)=jΓijkdxj,

or equivalently, for α=jαjdxj,

xiα=j(αjxikΓijkαk)dxj.

If g is a Riemannian metric with local coefficients gij:=g(xi,xj), write Γijk:=gkΓij. The connection is

  • symmetric when Γijk=Γjik in every chart;
  • metric-compatible with g when gjkxi=Γijk+Γikj in every chart.

For a smooth function f:MR, the tensor

2f:=(df)

is the covariant Hessian of f. In coordinates, if g=fx1,

(2f)ij=2gxixjkΓijkgxk.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

A Riemannian metric has a unique Levi-Civita connection on the cotangent bundle

Statement

Let g be a Riemannian metric on a smooth manifold M. Then there is a unique symmetric cotangent-bundle connection on M that is metric-compatible with g. In a coordinate chart its Christoffel symbols are

Γijk=12gk(gjxi+gixjgijx),

where (gk) is the inverse matrix of (gk). This connection is the Levi-Civita connection of g on the cotangent bundle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M with a Riemannian metric g.

[F1]

Symmetric cotangent-bundle connections, metric compatibility, and covariant Hessians are defined by the coordinate formulas in Riemannian metrics, symmetric cotangent-bundle connections, and covariant Hessians.

Proof

technique · local coefficient construction
1.1

Fix a coordinate chart and let (gij) be the metric matrix there. Since g is positive definite, (gij) is invertible at each point; write (gij) for the inverse matrix, define Γijk:=12(igjk+jgikkgij) and Γijk:=gkΓij, and use [F1] to obtain a local cotangent-bundle connection.

F1givenconstruct
2.1

The formula for Γijk is symmetric in i and j, so Γijk=Γjik. Hence the local connection is symmetric.

step 1.1algebra
2.2

Adding Γijk and Γikj gives Γijk+Γikj=igjk, so the local connection is metric-compatible with g in the sense of [F1].

F1step 1.1algebra
2.3

Let x=(xi) and y=(ya) be overlapping charts, and let x,y be the local connections from step 1.1 on those chart domains. On the overlap, write yb=ixiybxi,dya=kyaxkdxk. Using the connection formula from [F1] and the Leibniz rule gives ybxdya=cΓ~bcadyc, where Γ~bca=i,j,kyaxkΓijkxiybxjyc+kyaxk2xkybyc. Thus x is also a cotangent-bundle connection in the y-chart, with coefficients Γ~bca.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

Conversely, let Γ~ijk be the coefficients of any symmetric metric-compatible cotangent connection in this chart, and write Γ~ijk:=gkΓ~ij. Symmetry and metric compatibility give igjk=Γ~ijk+Γ~ikj, jgik=Γ~jik+Γ~jki, and kgij=Γ~kij+Γ~kji; substituting Γ~ijk=Γ~jik and Γ~ikj=Γ~kij yields 2Γ~ijk=igjk+jgikkgij, hence Γ~ijk=Γijk and Γ~ijk=Γijk.

F1step 2.1step 2.2algebra
3.2

The coefficients from step 2.3 are symmetric in b,c: the first term is symmetric because Γijk=Γjik by step 2.1, and the second is symmetric by equality of mixed partials. If g^cd=r,sgrsxrycxsyd are the metric coefficients in the y-chart, then differentiating this identity and using step 2.2 in the x-chart yields g^cdyb=Γ~bcd+Γ~bdc, where Γ~bcd:=ag^daΓ~bca. So x is symmetric and metric-compatible in the y-chart as well.

F1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3algebra
4.1

Step 3.1 now applies in the y-chart: the y-coefficients of x are exactly the Christoffel symbols computed from the metric in that chart. But that is how y was defined in step 1.1, so x=y on the overlap. Therefore the local operators glue to a global cotangent-bundle connection, and the same chartwise uniqueness proves global uniqueness.

step 1.1step 3.1step 3.2
5.1

Thus g has a unique symmetric metric-compatible cotangent-bundle connection, whose coordinate coefficients are the displayed Christoffel symbols.

step 1.1step 4.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

At a critical point, the intrinsic Hessian agrees with the Levi-Civita Hessian

Statement

Let f:MR be smooth, let p be a critical point of f, and let g be any Riemannian metric on M. If is the Levi-Civita connection of g, then

(2f)p=Hessp(f).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth function f:MR, a critical point p, a Riemannian metric g, and its Levi-Civita connection .

[F1]

The intrinsic critical-point Hessian is the bilinear form represented in a chart by the second partial derivatives of the coordinate representative (The intrinsic Hessian of a smooth function at a critical point).

[F2]

The covariant Hessian satisfies (2f)ij=2(fx1)xixjkΓijk(fx1)xk in any chart (Riemannian metrics, symmetric cotangent-bundle connections, and covariant Hessians).

[L1]

In a chart x=(x1,,xn) around p, dfp=i(fx1)xi(x(p))dxpi. (Coordinate formula for the differential of a function)

Proof

technique · coordinate computation
1.1

Choose a smooth chart x around p, put a:=x(p) and h:=fx1. By [F2], the coordinate matrix of (2f)p is (ijh(a)kΓijk(a)kh(a))ij.

F2given
1.2

Since p is critical, dfp=0, and [L1] therefore forces every coefficient kh(a) to vanish.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

Step 1.1 reduces to the matrix (ijh(a))ij, which is exactly the matrix of Hessp(f) by [F1]. Therefore (2f)p=Hessp(f).

F1step 1.1step 1.2
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex

Definition

Let f:MR be smooth and let p be a critical point of f. The Hessian Hessp(f) is a symmetric bilinear form on the finite-dimensional real vector space TpM (The intrinsic Hessian of a smooth function at a critical point).

  • The nullity of p for f is nullp(f):=dimker(Hessp(f)).
  • The critical point p is nondegenerate when nullp(f)=0.
  • The index of p for f is the largest dimension of a subspace of TpM on which Hessp(f) is negative definite.
  • The coindex of p for f is the largest dimension of a subspace of TpM on which Hessp(f) is positive definite.

The positivity and negativity conventions are those of Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature pq of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

Sylvester inertia makes the Morse index intrinsic

Statement

Let f:MR be smooth and let p be a critical point of f. Then the numbers of positive, negative, and zero directions of any chart matrix of Hessp(f) are independent of the chart. Equivalently, the nullity, index, and coindex of p are intrinsic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth function f:MR and a critical point p.

[F1]
[F2]

Nullity, index, and coindex are defined from the Hessian as kernel dimension and maximal negative- and positive-definite dimensions (Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex).

[L2]

The inertia counts are exactly the numbers of positive, negative, and zero entries in a diagonal normal form (Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia (p,q,r), rank p+q, and signature pq of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form).

Proof

technique · congruence invariance
1.1

By [F1], any two chart matrices of Hessp(f) are congruent real symmetric matrices.

F1given
2.1

Therefore [L1] and [L2] give the same triple (positive,negative,zero) for every chart matrix.

L1L2step 1.1
3.1

For one diagonal normal form, the zero count is the kernel dimension, the negative count is the maximal dimension of a negative-definite subspace, and the positive count is the maximal dimension of a positive-definite subspace, by [F2] and [L2]. Hence nullity, index, and coindex are the same in every chart.

F2L2step 2.1
4.1

Thus the Morse nullity, index, and coindex are intrinsic.

step 2.1step 3.1
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

Morse functions and excellent Morse functions

Definition

Let M be a smooth manifold and let f:MR be smooth.

Thus excellence is stronger than the Morse condition: it excludes repeated critical values, not repeated indices.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedaudited 2026-09-04Open item page →

Nondegenerate critical points are isolated

Statement

Let f:MR be smooth. Every nondegenerate critical point of f has an open neighbourhood containing no other critical point of f.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth function f:MR and a nondegenerate critical point p of f.

[F1]

A critical point is nondegenerate exactly when its Hessian has trivial kernel (The intrinsic Hessian of a smooth function at a critical point, Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex).

[L1]

In coordinates x=(x1,,xn), dfq=i(fx1)xi(x(q))dxqi. (Coordinate formula for the differential of a function)

[L2]

A C1 map RnRn with invertible derivative at a point is a local diffeomorphism there (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

Proof

technique · dimension split
1.1

If dimM=0, then {p} is open in M, so it already contains no other point and hence no other critical point.

given
1.2

Assume dimM=n>0. Choose a chart x:URn with x(p)=0, write g:=fx1, and define G(u):=(1g(u),,ng(u)). By [L1], for qU one has dfq=0 exactly when G(x(q))=0. [L1, given, assume-case[ positive-dimension], construct]

2.1

The derivative DG(0) is the Hessian matrix of g at 0, and [F1] makes it invertible because p is nondegenerate.

F1step 1.2
3.1

Applying [L2] to G at 0 gives a neighbourhood W of 0 in which G1(0)={0}. Therefore the corresponding neighbourhood x1[W]U contains no critical point except p.

L2step 2.1
4.1

The zero-dimensional case is step 1.1, and the positive-dimensional case is step 3.1. Hence every nondegenerate critical point is isolated.

step 1.1step 3.1
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

A Morse function on a compact manifold has finitely many critical points

Statement

If M is a compact smooth manifold and f:MR is a Morse function, then f has only finitely many critical points.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact smooth manifold M and a Morse function f:MR.

[F1]

Every critical point of a Morse function is nondegenerate (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions).

[L1]

Every nondegenerate critical point is isolated (Nondegenerate critical points are isolated).

[L3]

The vanishing of df in a chart is equivalent to the vanishing of all coordinate partial derivatives (Coordinate formula for the differential of a function).

Proof

technique · compactness cover
1.1

For each critical point p, [F1] and [L1] give an open neighbourhood Up containing no critical point other than p.

F1L1givenconstruct
1.2

If q is not critical, choose a chart x:URn around q and write g:=fx1. By [L3], some partial derivative g/xi is nonzero at x(q); continuity keeps it nonzero on a smaller open neighbourhood VqU, so Vq contains no critical point.

L3givenconstruct
2.1

The family of all Up together with all Vq covers M. By [L2], it has a finite subcover. Only finitely many sets of the form Up occur in that subcover, and each such set contains exactly one critical point by step 1.1. Therefore f has finitely many critical points.

L2step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Hence every Morse function on a compact manifold has finitely many critical points.

step 2.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedaudited 2026-09-04Open item page →

A nonzero second derivative splits off a signed square with a smooth parameter

Statement

Let m0, let UR×Rm be open around (0,0), and let F:UR be smooth with

F(0,0)=0,Fu(0,0)=0,2Fu2(0,0)0.

Then, after shrinking U, there are a sign ε{±1}, a smooth function H of the parameter variable, and a smooth local coordinate change (u,y)(u,y) fixing (0,0) such that

F(u,y)=H(y)+ε(u)2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open set U, the smooth function F, and the derivative hypotheses in the statement.

[L1]

The Euclidean implicit function theorem solves one scalar equation for one variable as a smooth function of the remaining parameters when the relevant partial derivative is invertible (The Euclidean implicit function theorem with derivative formula).

[L2]

A Euclidean map with invertible derivative at a point is a local diffeomorphism there (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

Proof

technique · local reduction
1.1

If m=0, define A(u):=01(1t)F(tu)dt. Then F(u)=u2A(u), A(0)=12F(0)0, and after shrinking the domain one has εA(u)>0 for ε=sgn(F(0)). Putting u:=uεA(u) gives F(u)=ε(u)2.

givenconstruct
1.2

Assume m>0. Put G(u,y):=F/u(u,y). Since G/u(0,0)=2F/u2(0,0)0, [L1] gives a smooth function ϕ near 0Rm with ϕ(0)=0 and G(ϕ(y),y)=0. [L1, given, assume-case[ positive-parameter], construct]

2.1

Set F~(s,y):=F(s+ϕ(y),y)F(ϕ(y),y). Then F~(0,y)=0 and F~/s(0,y)=0 for y near 0.

step 1.2algebra
3.1

Define A(s,y):=01(1t)2F~/s2(ts,y)dt. The integral formula gives F~(s,y)=s2A(s,y), and A(0,0)=122F/u2(0,0)0. After shrinking, the sign ε:=sgn(2F/u2(0,0)) satisfies εA(s,y)>0 everywhere.

step 2.1construct
4.1

Put β(s,y):=εA(s,y), define u:=β(s,y)s, and let H(y):=F(ϕ(y),y). Then F(s+ϕ(y),y)=H(y)+ε(u)2, and u/s(0,0)=β(0,0)0, so [L2] makes (s,y)(u,y) a local diffeomorphism at (0,0).

L2step 3.1construct
5.1

Composing the translation (u,y)(uϕ(y),y) from step 1.2 with the coordinate change from step 4.1 yields the required local coordinates (u,y), and the case m=0 is already covered by step 1.1.

step 1.1step 1.2step 4.1
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

Splitting one Morse coordinate preserves the residual Hessian

Statement

Let F be smooth near (0,0)R×Rm, assume dF(0,0)=0, and suppose there is a smooth local coordinate system (s,y) centered at (0,0), obtained from (u,y) by a change of variables of the form (u,y)(s,y), together with a smooth function H near 0Rm such that, in these coordinates,

F~(s,y):=F(u(s,y),y)=F(0,0)+εs2+H(y),ε{±1}.

Then 0 is a critical point of H, the Hessian of H at 0 is the restriction of the Hessian of F at (0,0) to the y-coordinate subspace in the (s,y) chart, and if Hess(0,0)(F) is nondegenerate then so is Hess0(H).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth function F, the local coordinates (s,y), and the decomposition F~(s,y)=F(0,0)+εs2+H(y) from the statement.

[F1]

The Hessian at a critical point is represented by the matrix of second partial derivatives in any chart (The intrinsic Hessian of a smooth function at a critical point).

Proof

technique · direct local comparison
1.1

Because the coordinate change fixes (0,0), the coordinate representative F~ also satisfies dF~(0,0)=0. Setting s=0 in the displayed decomposition gives F~(0,y)=F(0,0)+H(y). Differentiating at y=0 therefore shows dH0=0, so 0 is a critical point of H.

givenalgebra
2.1

In the coordinates (s,y), the function F~ has no mixed sy term and no term linear in s, so its Hessian matrix at (0,0) has block form (2ε00Hess0(H)). By [F1], this is the Hessian of F at (0,0) in the (s,y) chart, and the lower-right block is exactly its restriction to the y-coordinate subspace.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

If Hess0(H) had a nonzero kernel vector v, then (0,v) would lie in the kernel of the block matrix from step 2.1. Hence a nondegenerate Hessian for F forces Hess0(H) to be nondegenerate.

step 2.1algebra
4.1

Thus splitting one signed square preserves the residual critical Hessian.

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

Morse lemma

Statement

Let f:MR be smooth, let p be a nondegenerate critical point of f, and let λ be the index of p. If n=dimM, then there are local coordinates (x1,,xn) centered at p in which

f=f(p)i=1λ(xi)2+i=λ+1n(xi)2.

For n=0, both sums are empty.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth function f:MR, a nondegenerate critical point p, and its index λ.

[F1]

Index and nondegeneracy are defined from the critical Hessian (Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex).

[L1]

Sylvester's law gives a linear coordinate change that puts any symmetric Hessian matrix into diagonal normal form with its positive, negative, and zero counts recorded on the diagonal (Sylvester's law of inertia: every real symmetric form is congruent to diag(Ip,Iq,0r), and (p,q,r) is unique).

[L2]

The chartwise inertia counts of the Hessian equal the intrinsic index, coindex, and nullity (Sylvester inertia makes the Morse index intrinsic).

[L3]

A nonzero second derivative in one chosen coordinate splits off a signed square after a local coordinate change (A nonzero second derivative splits off a signed square with a smooth parameter).

[L4]

After splitting one signed square, the remaining Hessian is the restricted residual Hessian (Splitting one Morse coordinate preserves the residual Hessian).

Proof

technique · dimension induction
1.1

If n=0, the manifold is locally a point, so f is locally constant at p. The Hessian acts on the zero vector space, hence λ=0 by [F1], and the displayed formula is exactly f=f(p) with both sums empty.

F1givenbase
1.2

Assume the theorem proved in dimensions <n, where n>0. Choose local coordinates u=(u1,,un) centered at p and write g:=fu1f(p). By [L1], after a linear change of the u-coordinates the Hessian matrix of g at 0 is diagonal with entries in {1,1,0}. Since p is nondegenerate and has index λ, [F1] and [L2] force exactly λ negative diagonal entries, exactly nλ positive diagonal entries, and no zero entry. Reorder the coordinates so the first diagonal entry is negative when λ>0 and positive when λ=0; in particular 2g/(u1)2(0)0. [F1, L1, L2, given, assume-case[ positive-dimension], construct]

2.1

Apply [L3] to the first coordinate u1, taking the remaining variables as parameters. After shrinking the chart there are new coordinates (v1,y) with g(v1,y)=ε(v1)2+H(y), where ε{±1}, yRn1, and 0 is a critical point of H.

L3step 1.2construct
3.1

By [L2], the Hessian of g in the (v1,y) chart still has index λ. By [L4], the Hessian of H at 0 is the restriction to the y-coordinates, and the split v1-direction contributes one negative square exactly when ε=1. Therefore Hess0(H) is nondegenerate, with index λ1 when ε=1 and index λ when ε=1.

L2L4step 2.1algebra
4.1

Apply the induction hypothesis to H on Rn1. It yields local coordinates (v2,,vn) putting H into its Morse normal form, and adjoining v1 contributes one additional negative square exactly when ε=1. Therefore the full expression for g has exactly λ negative squares and nλ positive squares.

ihstep 3.1construct
5.1

Combining steps 2.1 and 4.1 proves the displayed normal form for dimension n, and step 1.1 covers the base case.

step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1discharge-induction
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

The Morse index detects local extrema and saddles

Statement

Let f:MR be smooth and let p be a nondegenerate critical point of index λ on an n-manifold.

  • If λ=0, then p is a strict local minimum of f.
  • If λ=n, then p is a strict local maximum of f.
  • If 0<λ<n, then p is a saddle point of f.

When n=0, the first two clauses coincide.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth function f:MR and a nondegenerate critical point p of index λ.

[L1]

Morse coordinates put ff(p) into the signed quadratic normal form with exactly λ negative squares (Morse lemma).

Proof

technique · normal form reading
1.1

By [L1], choose local coordinates centered at p in which ff(p)=i=1λ(xi)2+i=λ+1n(xi)2.

L1givenconstruct
2.1

If λ=0, the first sum is empty, so ff(p)=i=1n(xi)2, which is strictly positive for every nearby point other than p; hence p is a strict local minimum. If n=0, this same formula is ff(p)=0, so the local minimum and maximum clauses coincide.

step 1.1algebra
2.2

If λ=n, the second sum is empty, so ff(p)=i=1n(xi)2, which is strictly negative away from p. Hence p is a strict local maximum.

step 1.1algebra
2.3

If 0<λ<n, then along the x1-axis one has ff(p)=(x1)2<0 for nearby nonzero points, while along the xn-axis one has ff(p)=(xn)2>0 for nearby nonzero points. Therefore every neighbourhood of p contains points where f<f(p) and points where f>f(p), so p is a saddle.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The three cases above exhaust the possible values of λ.

step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedaudited 2026-09-04Open item page →

Index and coindex swap under negation

Statement

Let f:MR be smooth and let p be a critical point of f. Then p is also a critical point of f, the nullity is unchanged, and the index and coindex are exchanged:

nullp(f)=nullp(f),indp(f)=coindp(f),coindp(f)=indp(f).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth function f:MR and a critical point p of f.

[F1]

Nullity, index, and coindex are defined from the Hessian by kernel, negative-definite subspaces, and positive-definite subspaces (Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex).

Proof

technique · direct sign reversal
1.1

Because differentiation is linear, Hessp(f)=Hessp(f).

F1givenalgebra
2.1

Multiplication by 1 does not change the kernel of a bilinear form, so the nullity is unchanged.

F1step 1.1
2.2

A subspace is negative definite for Hessp(f) exactly when it is positive definite for Hessp(f), and similarly with "positive" and "negative" exchanged. Therefore the index and coindex swap by [F1].

F1step 1.1
3.1

Hence negating f preserves nullity and exchanges index with coindex.

step 2.1step 2.2
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

The critical level is a quadratic cone in Morse coordinates

Statement

Let f:MR be smooth, let p be a nondegenerate critical point of index λ on an n-manifold, and choose Morse coordinates around p. Then near p the critical level set is

f1(f(p))={i=1λ(xi)2=i=λ+1n(xi)2}.

If λ=0 or λ=n, this local level set is just the point p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth function f:MR and a nondegenerate critical point p of index λ.

[L1]

In Morse coordinates, ff(p)=i=1λ(xi)2+i=λ+1n(xi)2. (Morse lemma)

Proof

technique · normal form reading
1.1

By [L1], the equation f=f(p) becomes i=1λ(xi)2=i=λ+1n(xi)2.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

If λ=0, the left-hand side is the empty sum 0, so the equation is 0=i=1n(xi)2, which forces x=0. If λ=n, the right-hand side is the empty sum and the same conclusion follows.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Therefore the local critical level is the stated quadratic cone, with the index-0 and index-n cases collapsing to the single critical point.

step 1.1step 2.1
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04Open item page →

The zero-dimensional Morse convention

Remark

On a 0-manifold, every tangent space is the zero vector space. Therefore for every smooth f:MR and every point pM, one has dfp=0, so every point is critical (Critical points and critical values of a smooth function). The Hessian is the zero bilinear form on the zero vector space, whose kernel is also zero, so every point is nondegenerate with nullity, index, and coindex all equal to 0 (Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex).

Thus a smooth function on a nonempty 0-manifold is automatically Morse, and it is excellent exactly when distinct points have distinct values. On the empty 0-manifold there are no critical points at all.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources