How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Index and coindex swap under negation
Statement
Let be smooth and let be a critical point of . Then is also a critical point of , the nullity is unchanged, and the index and coindex are exchanged:
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth function and a critical point of .
Nullity, index, and coindex are defined from the Hessian by kernel, negative-definite subspaces, and positive-definite subspaces (Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex).
Proof
Because differentiation is linear, .
Multiplication by does not change the kernel of a bilinear form, so the nullity is unchanged.
A subspace is negative definite for exactly when it is positive definite for , and similarly with "positive" and "negative" exchanged. Therefore the index and coindex swap by [F1].
Hence negating preserves nullity and exchanges index with coindex.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michele Audin and Mihai Damian, Morse Theory and Floer Homology (standard reference, not scraped)