How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A Riemannian metric has a unique Levi-Civita connection on the cotangent bundle
Statement
Let be a Riemannian metric on a smooth manifold . Then there is a unique symmetric cotangent-bundle connection on that is metric-compatible with . In a coordinate chart its Christoffel symbols are
where is the inverse matrix of . This connection is the Levi-Civita connection of on the cotangent bundle.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth manifold with a Riemannian metric .
Symmetric cotangent-bundle connections, metric compatibility, and covariant Hessians are defined by the coordinate formulas in Riemannian metrics, symmetric cotangent-bundle connections, and covariant Hessians.
Proof
Fix a coordinate chart and let be the metric matrix there. Since is positive definite, is invertible at each point; write for the inverse matrix, define and , and use [F1] to obtain a local cotangent-bundle connection.
The formula for is symmetric in and , so . Hence the local connection is symmetric.
Adding and gives , so the local connection is metric-compatible with in the sense of [F1].
Let and be overlapping charts, and let be the local connections from step 1.1 on those chart domains. On the overlap, write Using the connection formula from [F1] and the Leibniz rule gives where Thus is also a cotangent-bundle connection in the -chart, with coefficients .
Conversely, let be the coefficients of any symmetric metric-compatible cotangent connection in this chart, and write . Symmetry and metric compatibility give , , and ; substituting and yields , hence and .
The coefficients from step 2.3 are symmetric in : the first term is symmetric because by step 2.1, and the second is symmetric by equality of mixed partials. If are the metric coefficients in the -chart, then differentiating this identity and using step 2.2 in the -chart yields where . So is symmetric and metric-compatible in the -chart as well.
Step 3.1 now applies in the -chart: the -coefficients of are exactly the Christoffel symbols computed from the metric in that chart. But that is how was defined in step 1.1, so on the overlap. Therefore the local operators glue to a global cotangent-bundle connection, and the same chartwise uniqueness proves global uniqueness.
Thus has a unique symmetric metric-compatible cotangent-bundle connection, whose coordinate coefficients are the displayed Christoffel symbols.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ralph L. Cohen, Bundles, Manifolds, and Homotopy (standard reference, not scraped)
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)