How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonzero second derivative splits off a signed square with a smooth parameter
Statement
Let , let be open around , and let be smooth with
Then, after shrinking , there are a sign , a smooth function of the parameter variable, and a smooth local coordinate change fixing such that
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The open set , the smooth function , and the derivative hypotheses in the statement.
The Euclidean implicit function theorem solves one scalar equation for one variable as a smooth function of the remaining parameters when the relevant partial derivative is invertible (The Euclidean implicit function theorem with derivative formula).
A Euclidean map with invertible derivative at a point is a local diffeomorphism there (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).
Proof
If , define . Then , , and after shrinking the domain one has for . Putting gives .
Assume . Put . Since , [L1] gives a smooth function near with and . [L1, given, assume-case[ positive-parameter], construct]
Set . Then and for near .
Define . The integral formula gives , and . After shrinking, the sign satisfies everywhere.
Put , define , and let . Then , and , so [L2] makes a local diffeomorphism at .
Composing the translation from step 1.2 with the coordinate change from step 4.1 yields the required local coordinates , and the case is already covered by step 1.1.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michele Audin and Mihai Damian, Morse Theory and Floer Homology (standard reference, not scraped)
- Liviu I. Nicolaescu, An Invitation to Morse Theory, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)