Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
About this page
How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
✓ 29 results · all verified · 29 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 29 also cleared it.
1 · Prerequisites
Real Analysis
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Countability and Uncountability
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Suprema and Infima
Set Theory
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Items
Definition
Second countability: an at most countable basis for the topology
Definition
Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset
Definition
The countable chain condition: every pairwise-disjoint family of nonempty open sets is at most countable
Definition
Under choice, weight w(X), density d(X), local character χ(x,X), and character χ(X) as raw cardinal minima and a supremum
Definition
Under choice, Lindelöf degree L(X) and cellularity c(X) as raw cardinal functions
Lemma
Under choice, w(X) is a well-defined cardinal
Lemma
Under choice, d(X) is a well-defined cardinal
Lemma
Under choice, χ(x,X) and χ(X) are well-defined cardinals
Lemma
Under choice, L(X) is a well-defined cardinal
Lemma
Under choice, c(X) is a well-defined cardinal
Corollary
Under choice, the five cardinal functions recover first countability, second countability, separability, Lindelöfness, and ccc at the ℵ₀ threshold
Lemma
A countable local base can be chosen open and decreasing
Theorem
Every second countable space is first countable
Theorem
Assuming countable choice, every second countable space is separable
Theorem
Assuming countable choice, every second countable space is Lindelöf
Theorem
Assuming countable choice, a metrizable space is second countable if and only if it is separable if and only if it is Lindelöf
Proposition
Second countability is hereditary
Theorem
Assuming countable choice, a countable product of second countable spaces is second countable
Theorem
Assuming countable choice, a countable product of first countable spaces is first countable
Proposition
Every separable space satisfies the countable chain condition
Theorem
Under choice, c(X)≤ d(X)≤ w(X) and χ(X),L(X)≤ w(X)
Proposition
Under choice, for Y⊆ X, w(Y)≤ w(X) and χ(y,Y)≤χ(y,X)
Proposition
Under choice, a continuous surjection does not increase density or Lindelöf degree
Theorem
Under choice, every metrizable space has w(X)=d(X)
Lemma
Under choice, the uncountable Δ-system lemma for finite sets
Theorem
Under choice, every Cantor cube 2^I satisfies ccc
Lemma
Under choice, if |I|>2^ℵ₀, then the Cantor cube 2^I is not separable
False statement
Assuming choice, refuted: every ccc space is separable
False statement
Refuted: every first countable space is second countable
False statement
Refuted: every separable space is second countable
False statement
Refuted: separability is hereditary
False statement
Refuted: Lindelöfness is hereditary
False statement
Assuming countable choice, refuted: Lindelöfness is productive
False statement
Assuming choice and countable choice, refuted: arbitrary products of second countable spaces are second countable
Remark
Implication, preservation, counterexample, and choice ledger for the countability axioms
Sources
- UCR General Topology Notes
- Second-countable space (Wikipedia)
- Separable space (Wikipedia)
- Countable chain condition (Wikipedia)
- D. H. Fremlin, Measure Theory, Chapter 5A
- Cardinal function (Wikipedia)
- First-countable space (Wikipedia)
- nLab: second-countable spaces are Lindelöf
- Delta-system lemma (Wikipedia)
- Sunflower lemma (Wikipedia)
- Cantor cube (Wikipedia)
- Lower limit topology (Wikipedia)
- Sorgenfrey plane (Wikipedia)
- Fort space (Wikipedia)
- Alexandroff extension (Wikipedia)