How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dense, nowhere dense and codense subsets of a topological space, and the criterion by basic open sets
Definition
Let be a topological space, let be a basis for (Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets) and let . Interior and closure are as in Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space.
- is dense in if .
- is codense in if is dense.
- is nowhere dense in if .
Three equivalent forms of density, and the one used in practice. The following are equivalent:
- ;
- for every nonempty open ;
- for every nonempty .
Proof. (1) (2): if is open and nonempty, pick ; then , so by clause (c) of A point lies in the closure of iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets ; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals together with its derived set. (2) (3): a nonempty member of is a nonempty open set. (3) (1): let ; every with is nonempty and so meets , hence by clause (d) of A point lies in the closure of iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets ; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals together with its derived set. Form 3 is what makes density checkable: for the Sorgenfrey line it is a statement about half-open intervals, and for a metric space a statement about balls.
Codensity is emptiness of the interior. is codense if and only if , because (Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space), so holds exactly when .
Nowhere dense implies codense, and the converse fails. If then by monotonicity of the interior, so is codense. The two notions can differ only on sets whose closure is larger than themselves, and there they sometimes do: a dense set with empty interior, such as the rationals inside the real line, is codense and is not nowhere dense, its closure being everything. They may also agree on such a set: inside has closure and is neither codense nor nowhere dense. A closed set is nowhere dense precisely when it is codense, since then .
Remarks
-
Density is a property of the pair, not of the set. A subset dense in need not be dense in a space with a finer topology. In a nonempty indiscrete space every nonempty subset is dense, while is not; in the empty space is dense as well. Where a density claim is made below the topology is always named.
-
The empty set. is nowhere dense and codense in every space, and it is dense only in . itself is dense in and is nowhere dense only when .
-
What is deliberately not defined here. Separability, meaning the existence of an at most countable dense subset, is a countability axiom not developed at this point in the reading order; it is defined later in Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset ↗. Where a space on the companion page has an at most countable dense subset, that is what is said in full.
Depends on
- Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space
- A point lies in the closure of $A$ iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets $A$; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals $A$ together with its derived set
- Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets
Used by
- Two continuous maps into a Hausdorff space that agree on a dense subset are equal Corollary
- ℝ/ℚ carries the indiscrete topology, although ℝ is metrizable and the quotient has more than one point Counterexample
- Refuted: the agreement set of two continuous maps is closed, with no hypothesis on the codomain. Two continuous maps ℝ → {a,b} into the indiscrete two-point space have agreement set ℚ Counterexample
- The antidiagonal {(x,-x)} is an uncountable discrete subspace of the Sorgenfrey plane, so having a countable dense subset is not a hereditary property Counterexample
- A Hausdorff compactification as a dense embedding into a compact Hausdorff space Definition
- Baire space: a topological space in which every countable intersection of dense open subsets is dense Definition
- Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset Definition
- Under choice, weight w(X), density d(X), local character χ(x,X), and character χ(X) as raw cardinal minima and a supremum Definition
- On an infinite set the cofinite topology has every infinite subset dense and no two nonempty open sets disjoint Example
- Sierpinski space and the particular-point topology, with their closures and their continuous maps Example
- The Sorgenfrey line: ℝ with the half-open intervals [a,b) as a basis is strictly finer than the usual topology, is first countable, has a countable dense subset, and its sequences converge only from the right Example
- The Sorgenfrey plane: the product of two half-open-interval lines has the rectangles [a,b) × [c,d) as a basis and ℚ × ℚ as a countable dense subset Example
- Two continuous maps ℝ → ℝ agreeing at every rational are equal Example
- FALSE: two continuous maps that agree on a dense subset of their common domain are equal, with no hypothesis on the codomain False statement
- Jones's bound: under choice, a closed discrete subspace of a normal space cannot have more subsets than a dense set has subsets Lemma
- The lower-limit plane has a countable dense set and a closed discrete antidiagonal of size |ℝ| Lemma
- Every separable space satisfies the countable chain condition Proposition
- A product of connected spaces is connected in the product topology, and that argument is a theorem of ZF; for an infinite index set it is the assertion that the product of nonempty spaces is nonempty that uses the Axiom of Choice Theorem
- Assuming countable choice, every second countable space is separable Theorem
- Assuming dependent choice, every locally compact Hausdorff space is a Baire space Theorem
- For A ⊆ S ⊆ X the closure of A in S is overlineA^X ∩ S, while the interior only contains int^X(A) ∩ S, with equality when S is open; and a dense subset of X traces to a dense subset of every open S Theorem
- X^* is compact and contains X as an open subspace; X is dense in X^* exactly when X is not compact; and X^* is Hausdorff exactly when X is locally compact and Hausdorff Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 6 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Dense set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nowhere dense set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Munkres, Topology, 2nd ed., §17 (standard reference, not scraped)