How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sierpinski space and the particular-point topology, with their closures and their continuous maps
Example
Let be a set, let , and give the particular-point topology (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies). Then, for :
- Closed sets. The closed subsets of are together with the sets not containing .
- Interior and closure (Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space): In particular is dense (Dense, nowhere dense and codense subsets of a topological space, and the criterion by basic open sets) and is the smallest dense subset, while has empty interior.
- No two nonempty open sets are disjoint, since every nonempty open set contains .
- Sierpinski space is the case of a two-point set. With , , and particular point , the topology is ; here and , so is the open point and the closed point.
- Continuous maps into Sierpinski space are exactly the open subsets of the source. For a topological space , the assignment is a bijection from the set of continuous maps onto the topology of (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and ).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set with a point and the particular-point topology ; a subset ; the two-point set with and particular point ; and a topological space with topology .
consists of together with the subsets of containing ; a set is closed exactly when its complement is open (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies, Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).
is the largest open subset of and the smallest closed superset of (Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space).
A map is continuous exactly when preimages of open sets are open (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and , clause (b), Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).
Verification
is closed exactly when is open, that is exactly when , giving , or , that is ; this is claim 1.
If then is open by [A1], so ; if then no nonempty open set is contained in , every such set containing , so .
Two nonempty open sets both contain , so their intersection contains and is nonempty; this is claim 3.
For with particular point , the subsets containing are and , so , which is .
If then is closed by step 1.1, so ; if then no closed set other than contains , a closed proper subset omitting by step 1.1, so .
Let be any function; by [L2] and step 1.4, is continuous exactly when , and are all open in , and the first two always are; so is continuous exactly when .
Steps 1.2 and 2.1 give claim 2; in particular makes dense by [L1], and it is contained in every dense set, since a set with has whenever . Also by step 1.2.
By step 1.4 and step 2.1 applied to : since is the particular point, and since ; this is claim 4.
The assignment of step 2.2 is injective, since is determined by — its value is there and elsewhere — and surjective onto , since for the function taking the value on and off is continuous by step 2.2 and has ; this is claim 5.
Claims 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are established by step 1.1, step 3.1, step 1.3, step 3.2 and step 3.3 respectively.
Remarks
-
Sierpinski space is the smallest space that is not indiscrete and not discrete, and claim 5 is why it matters: it represents the notion "open set" as a mapping problem, in the same way that a two-element set represents "subset". Every topology on is recovered as the set of continuous maps .
-
When has at least two points, the particular-point topology separates distinct points only in the weakest sense. Any two distinct points are distinguished by an open set: if one of them is , then is open and contains but not the other; and if neither is , then is open and contains but not . It is not Hausdorff: every two nonempty open sets meet at , and is dense by claim 2. When , by contrast, the topology is discrete and the separation axioms hold vacuously. In every case the space is first countable, since is a one-element neighbourhood base at : any neighbourhood of contains an open set containing , which contains as well.
-
A comparison with the cofinite topology. When is infinite, both have the property that any two nonempty open sets meet (On an infinite set the cofinite topology has every infinite subset dense and no two nonempty open sets disjoint), but the particular-point topology achieves it with a single point doing all the work. When has at least two points, its particular point is not closed, whereas every point is closed in the cofinite topology.
Depends on
- The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies
- Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space
- For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and $f(\overline{A}) \subseteq \overline{f(A)}$
- Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison
- Dense, nowhere dense and codense subsets of a topological space, and the criterion by basic open sets
- Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 42 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sierpinski space (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Particular point topology (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)