Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)verified 2026-08-03 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sierpinski space and the particular-point topology, with their closures and their continuous maps

Example

Let XX be a set, let pXp \in X, and give XX the particular-point topology Tp={}{UX:pU}\mathcal{T}_p = \{\varnothing\} \cup \{\, U \subseteq X : p \in U \,\} (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies). Then, for AXA \subseteq X:

  1. Closed sets. The closed subsets of (X,Tp)(X, \mathcal{T}_p) are XX together with the sets not containing pp.
  2. Interior and closure (Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space): int(A)={ApApA,A={XpAApA.\operatorname{int}(A) = \begin{cases} A & p \in A \\ \varnothing & p \notin A, \end{cases} \qquad \overline{A} = \begin{cases} X & p \in A \\ A & p \notin A. \end{cases} In particular {p}\{p\} is dense (Dense, nowhere dense and codense subsets of a topological space, and the criterion by basic open sets) and is the smallest dense subset, while X{p}X \setminus \{p\} has empty interior.
  3. No two nonempty open sets are disjoint, since every nonempty open set contains pp.
  4. Sierpinski space is the case of a two-point set. With S={a,b}S = \{a,b\}, aba \ne b, and particular point bb, the topology is TSier={,{b},S}\mathcal{T}_{\mathrm{Sier}} = \{\varnothing, \{b\}, S\}; here {b}=S\overline{\{b\}} = S and {a}={a}\overline{\{a\}} = \{a\}, so bb is the open point and aa the closed point.
  5. Continuous maps into Sierpinski space are exactly the open subsets of the source. For a topological space YY, the assignment ff1[{b}]f \mapsto f^{-1}[\{b\}] is a bijection from the set of continuous maps Y(S,TSier)Y \to (S, \mathcal{T}_{\mathrm{Sier}}) onto the topology of YY (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and f(A)f(A)f(\overline{A}) \subseteq \overline{f(A)}).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A set XX with a point pXp \in X and the particular-point topology Tp\mathcal{T}_p; a subset AXA \subseteq X; the two-point set S={a,b}S = \{a,b\} with aba \ne b and particular point bb; and a topological space YY with topology TY\mathcal{T}_Y.

[A1]

Tp\mathcal{T}_p consists of \varnothing together with the subsets of XX containing pp; a set is closed exactly when its complement is open (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies, Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).

[A2]

int(A)\operatorname{int}(A) is the largest open subset of AA and A\overline{A} the smallest closed superset of AA (Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

FXF \subseteq X is closed exactly when XFX \setminus F is open, that is exactly when XF=X \setminus F = \varnothing, giving F=XF = X, or pXFp \in X \setminus F, that is pFp \notin F; this is claim 1.

A1
1.2

If pAp \in A then AA is open by [A1], so int(A)=A\operatorname{int}(A) = A; if pAp \notin A then no nonempty open set is contained in AA, every such set containing pp, so int(A)=\operatorname{int}(A) = \varnothing.

A1A2
1.3

Two nonempty open sets both contain pp, so their intersection contains pp and is nonempty; this is claim 3.

A1
1.4

For S={a,b}S = \{a,b\} with particular point bb, the subsets containing bb are {b}\{b\} and SS, so Tb={,{b},S}\mathcal{T}_b = \{\varnothing, \{b\}, S\}, which is TSier\mathcal{T}_{\mathrm{Sier}}.

A1
2.1

If pAp \notin A then AA is closed by step 1.1, so A=A\overline{A} = A; if pAp \in A then no closed set other than XX contains AA, a closed proper subset omitting pp by step 1.1, so A=X\overline{A} = X.

step 1.1A2
2.2

Let f:YSf : Y \to S be any function; by [L2] and step 1.4, ff is continuous exactly when f1[]=f^{-1}[\varnothing] = \varnothing, f1[S]=Yf^{-1}[S] = Y and f1[{b}]f^{-1}[\{b\}] are all open in YY, and the first two always are; so ff is continuous exactly when f1[{b}]TYf^{-1}[\{b\}] \in \mathcal{T}_Y.

step 1.4L2
3.1

Steps 1.2 and 2.1 give claim 2; in particular {p}=X\overline{\{p\}} = X makes {p}\{p\} dense by [L1], and it is contained in every dense set, since a set AA with pAp \notin A has A=AX\overline{A} = A \ne X whenever pAp \notin A. Also int(X{p})=\operatorname{int}(X \setminus \{p\}) = \varnothing by step 1.2.

step 1.2step 2.1L1
3.2

By step 1.4 and step 2.1 applied to SS: {b}=S\overline{\{b\}} = S since bb is the particular point, and {a}={a}\overline{\{a\}} = \{a\} since b{a}b \notin \{a\}; this is claim 4.

step 2.1step 1.4
3.3

The assignment ff1[{b}]f \mapsto f^{-1}[\{b\}] of step 2.2 is injective, since ff is determined by f1[{b}]f^{-1}[\{b\}] — its value is bb there and aa elsewhere — and surjective onto TY\mathcal{T}_Y, since for UTYU \in \mathcal{T}_Y the function taking the value bb on UU and aa off UU is continuous by step 2.2 and has f1[{b}]=Uf^{-1}[\{b\}] = U; this is claim 5.

step 2.2L2
4.1

Claims 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are established by step 1.1, step 3.1, step 1.3, step 3.2 and step 3.3 respectively.

step 1.1step 1.3step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3

Remarks

  • Sierpinski space is the smallest space that is not indiscrete and not discrete, and claim 5 is why it matters: it represents the notion "open set" as a mapping problem, in the same way that a two-element set represents "subset". Every topology on YY is recovered as the set of continuous maps YSY \to S.

  • When XX has at least two points, the particular-point topology separates distinct points only in the weakest sense. Any two distinct points are distinguished by an open set: if one of them is pp, then {p}\{p\} is open and contains pp but not the other; and if neither is pp, then {x,p}\{x,p\} is open and contains xx but not yy. It is not Hausdorff: every two nonempty open sets meet at pp, and {p}\{p\} is dense by claim 2. When X={p}X=\{p\}, by contrast, the topology is discrete and the separation axioms hold vacuously. In every case the space is first countable, since {{x,p}}\{\{x,p\}\} is a one-element neighbourhood base at xx: any neighbourhood of xx contains an open set containing xx, which contains pp as well.

  • A comparison with the cofinite topology. When XX is infinite, both have the property that any two nonempty open sets meet (On an infinite set the cofinite topology has every infinite subset dense and no two nonempty open sets disjoint), but the particular-point topology achieves it with a single point doing all the work. When XX has at least two points, its particular point pp is not closed, whereas every point is closed in the cofinite topology.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 42 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources