Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Refuted: Lindelöfness is hereditary

Statement

Lindelöfness is hereditary.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The uncountable discrete space D=R and its one-point compactification D∗.

[L2]

Compactness gives a finite subcover for every open cover, Lindelöfness gives an at most countable subcover, and a property is hereditary when every subspace has it (Countably compact, Lindel"of, sequentially compact, limit point compact and σ-compact spaces, and relatively compact subsets, Hereditary, open-hereditary and closed-hereditary properties of topological spaces).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

The discrete space D is Hausdorff because distinct singleton neighbourhoods are disjoint, and locally compact because each point has the compact singleton neighbourhood; it is not compact because its singleton cover has no finite subcover. Thus its one-point compactification has the usual compact Hausdorff behavior, and in any case [L1] makes D∗ compact with D as an open subspace. By [L2], D∗ is Lindelöf.

L1L2L3F1
1.2

The subspace D is discrete and has the open cover {{x}:x∈D}; any subcover must contain every singleton, so no at most countable subfamily covers the uncountable set D.

L3
2.1

Thus the Lindelöf space D∗ has the non-Lindelöf subspace D, so Lindelöfness is not hereditary.

step 1.1step 1.2L2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources