How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The one-point (Alexandroff) compactification , whose open sets are the open sets of together with the complements in of the closed compact subsets of
Definition
Let be a topological space (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).
A point outside , named rather than assumed. Put
a set by Separation. Then : were , the defining condition applied to itself would give . So no hypothesis about is needed to obtain a point outside it, and the construction below is available for every space.
The space. Put and
The pair is the one-point compactification, or Alexandroff compactification, of . Members of are said to be of the first kind and the sets of the second kind; a set of the second kind is exactly an open set of containing , since a member of is a subset of , and the set is recovered from it as .
is a topology on , and this is discharged here. Throughout, "closed" and "compact" without qualification mean closed in and a compact subset of (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right); two facts about such sets are used and both are A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact: a subset of a compact that is closed in is closed in the subspace (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace) and hence compact, and a union of two compact subsets is compact.
(T1). , and is of the second kind, being closed in and compact.
(T2). Let , let be the members of lying in and the rest, so that every member of is of the second kind. If then lies in by (T2) in . Otherwise put and , a nonempty family of closed compact subsets of , and . Then is closed by (C2) of Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison, and it is a closed subset of any one member of , hence compact. Now
and is closed in and a subset of the compact , hence compact; so is of the second kind.
(T3). For the intersection lies in by (T3) in . For two sets of the second kind, , and is closed in and compact as a union of two compact subsets. For one of each, gives , an intersection of two members of .
Why the compact sets are also required to be closed. The complement of a compact set that is not closed in would not make 's neighbourhoods behave: the union computation in (T2) uses that an intersection of the discarded sets is again closed, and the intersection of arbitrary compact subsets of a non-Hausdorff space need not be compact. When is Hausdorff every compact subset is closed (In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones) and the two descriptions agree, which is why many texts state the definition without the word "closed" and silently assume the Hausdorff case.
Remarks
What the name promises is proved, not assumed. That is compact, that sits inside it as an open subspace carrying its own topology, and the exact conditions under which is dense in or is Hausdorff, are is compact and contains as an open subspace; is dense in exactly when is not compact; and is Hausdorff exactly when is locally compact and Hausdorff ↗. Nothing above uses any of them.
The added point is a genuine construction and not a choice. The set above is determined by ; no appeal to any principle of choice is made, and no "take a point not in " is left unexplained.
is Hausdorff exactly when is locally compact and Hausdorff (Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space), which is the reason local compactness and this construction always appear together.
Depends on
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
- A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact
Used by
- The one-point compactification of discrete ℕ is not βℕ Counterexample
- ℝ^* is homeomorphic to the unit circle by inverse stereographic projection, and ℕ^* is the ordinal space ω + 1 Example
- The one-point compactification of the discrete real line is compact and Lindelöf but is neither first countable nor separable Example
- FALSE: every Hausdorff compactification has the Stone–Čech extension property False statement
- Refuted: Lindelöfness is hereditary False statement
- The quasicompact convention, why compactness of a subset is read intrinsically here, and what each result on this page costs in choice Remark
- Under dependent choice a locally compact Hausdorff space is completely regular, hence Tychonoff Theorem
- X^* is compact and contains X as an open subspace; X is dense in X^* exactly when X is not compact; and X^* is Hausdorff exactly when X is locally compact and Hausdorff Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 34 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexandroff extension (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Munkres, Topology, 2nd ed., §29 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Tag 090A (standard reference, not scraped)