Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniformly tiny perturbations on larger and larger shells of a noncompact manifold can create new critical points far out

Statement refuted

On a noncompact manifold, perturbations that are uniformly tiny in value cannot create new critical points far out at infinity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth bump function β:RR supported in [1,1] with β(0)=1, the base function f(x)=x, and the perturbations gn(x)=x+1nβ(n2(xn)).

[L1]

The A-page remark records that compact-set smallness alone is not a substitute for the strong topology on a noncompact manifold, because drifting-shell perturbations can create new critical points far out at infinity (On a noncompact manifold, this page states Morse genericity as a strong-topology residual theorem).

Counterexample

technique · direct construction
1.1

One has gnf1/n, so the perturbations are uniformly tiny in value. Their supports lie in [n1/n2,n+1/n2], hence for every fixed compact set KR one has gn=f on K once n is large enough.

givenalgebra
2.1

Differentiating gives gn(x)=1+nβ(n2(xn)). In particular gn(n)=1+nβ(0)=1n0, with equality only when n=1, while outside the support interval one has gn(x)=1. Thus g1(1)=0, and for every n2 continuity gives some xn[n1/n2,n+1/n2] with gn(xn)=0. Thus each gn has a new critical point near x=n.

step 1.1givenalgebra
3.1

Step 1.1 shows that the perturbations are tiny on every fixed compact set, while step 2.1 shows that they still create new far-out critical points. This is exactly the noncompact failure mode recorded in [L1]. Therefore the displayed claim is false.

L1step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources