How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniformly tiny perturbations on larger and larger shells of a noncompact manifold can create new critical points far out
Statement refuted
On a noncompact manifold, perturbations that are uniformly tiny in value cannot create new critical points far out at infinity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth bump function supported in with , the base function , and the perturbations .
The A-page remark records that compact-set smallness alone is not a substitute for the strong topology on a noncompact manifold, because drifting-shell perturbations can create new critical points far out at infinity (On a noncompact manifold, this page states Morse genericity as a strong-topology residual theorem).
Counterexample
One has , so the perturbations are uniformly tiny in value. Their supports lie in , hence for every fixed compact set one has on once is large enough.
Differentiating gives . In particular , with equality only when , while outside the support interval one has . Thus , and for every continuity gives some with . Thus each has a new critical point near .
Step 1.1 shows that the perturbations are tiny on every fixed compact set, while step 2.1 shows that they still create new far-out critical points. This is exactly the noncompact failure mode recorded in [L1]. Therefore the displayed claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Marco Gualtieri, Topology I: Smooth Manifolds, Part 10 (standard reference, not scraped)