How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sard Theorem and Transversality
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This page makes measure-zero subsets intrinsic on smooth manifolds, proves Morse-Sard in Euclidean and manifold form, and then packages transversality through preimage, intersection, fibre-product, parametric, and stability statements. It keeps the whole route inside manifolds without boundary and stops before Whitney embedding, approximation, and boundary transversality.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Null subsets of a smooth manifold
Definition
Let be a smooth -manifold, and let be a smooth atlas on . A subset is -null when, for every chart , the set
is null in the Euclidean sense of Measure zero and content zero in by countable and finite cube covers when , and is empty when . Equivalently, on a -manifold the only null subset is the empty set.
The next proposition shows that this condition is independent of the chosen smooth atlas, so one may then speak simply of a null subset of .
A map is locally Lipschitz on compact coordinate subsets
Statement
Let be , let be a chart on , let be a chart on with , and let be compact. Then every point of has an open neighbourhood with such that the coordinate representative is Lipschitz on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A map , charts and with , and a compact set .
A map has a coordinate representative between Euclidean chart domains ( and smooth maps between smooth manifolds).
A continuous real-valued function on a compact metric space attains a maximum (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).
On a convex Euclidean set, a bound on the derivative norm gives a Lipschitz bound (On a convex open set, a uniform bound implies ).
Proof
Let . By [F1], is on the open set . For each choose an open Euclidean ball with compact and contained in .
The derivative norm is continuous on each compact ball , so [L1] gives a finite bound there. Since is convex, [L2] makes -Lipschitz on .
Put . Then is an open neighbourhood of with , and is Lipschitz on . Since was arbitrary in , the claim follows.
local diffeomorphisms preserve null sets locally
Statement
Let be a local diffeomorphism. For every point there is an open neighbourhood of such that is a diffeomorphism and, for every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A local diffeomorphism and a point .
A local diffeomorphism restricts near to a diffeomorphism onto an open neighbourhood of (Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds).
On a -manifold, the only null subset is the empty set (Null subsets of a smooth manifold).
On compact coordinate pieces, a map is locally Lipschitz (A map is locally Lipschitz on compact coordinate subsets).
Lipschitz maps send Euclidean null sets to Euclidean null sets (A Lipschitz map sends null sets to null sets).
Proof
By [F1], shrink around to a neighbourhood on which is a diffeomorphism onto an open set .
If , then and are -manifolds. [F2, step 1.1, cases, algebra] By [F2], a subset of is null exactly when it is empty, and the same holds in ; because is bijective, So the claim is proved in this case. Assume henceforth that , and let .
Cover by relatively compact source-chart neighbourhoods whose images lie in target charts on . [L1, L2, step 2.1, algebra] By [L1], the coordinate representatives of and are Lipschitz on smaller compact closures. Therefore [L2] implies for each such piece .
The manifold definition of nullity checks exactly these chart images, so [step 3.1] the equivalence in step 3.1 globalizes over . Hence is null in exactly when is null in .
The null-set definition is independent of the smooth atlas
Statement
If and are smooth atlases on the same smooth manifold , then a subset is -null if and only if it is -null.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Smooth atlases and on a smooth manifold , and a subset .
A set is atlas-null when every chart image in that atlas is Euclidean null (Null subsets of a smooth manifold).
Local diffeomorphisms preserve null sets locally ( local diffeomorphisms preserve null sets locally).
Every open cover admits a countable cover by relatively compact coordinate balls subordinate to it (Every open cover of a manifold has a countable relatively compact coordinate-ball subcover).
Proof
Assume is -null. Fix a chart . The sets with cover , so [L2] gives a countable cover of by relatively compact coordinate balls .
On each , the transition map is a local diffeomorphism between Euclidean chart domains. Since is -null, [F1] makes null. Applying [L1] to the transition map shows that is null for every .
The set is the countable union of the null sets , hence is null. Since was arbitrary, is -null by [F1]. The reverse implication is symmetric.
A countable chart cover detects manifold null sets
Statement
Let be a smooth manifold. If is a countable smooth atlas with relatively compact domains, then a subset is null if and only if every is null in when , and every is empty when .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A countable smooth atlas with relatively compact domains on a smooth manifold .
On a -manifold, the only null subset is the empty set (Null subsets of a smooth manifold).
Nullity is independent of the chosen smooth atlas (The null-set definition is independent of the smooth atlas).
Proof
If , [F1] says that is null exactly when . Because the chart domains cover , this is equivalent to every being empty, hence to every chart image being empty.
Assume . If is null, then every chart image is null by definition.
Conversely, the given countable atlas is itself a smooth atlas, so [L2] says that being null with respect to this atlas is the same as being null with respect to any other. Therefore the displayed chartwise condition implies that is null.
Hence this countable chart cover detects manifold null sets in every dimension.
Countable unions and subsets of manifold null sets are null
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Every subset of a manifold null set is null, and every countable union of manifold null sets is null.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, null subsets of a smooth manifold , and a subset .
A countable chart cover detects manifold nullity (A countable chart cover detects manifold null sets).
In Euclidean space, subsets of null sets are null (Measure zero and content zero in by countable and finite cube covers).
Countable Choice permits one null cover to be selected for each member of a sequence (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The set is countable, and the geometric budgets sum to (, For , , and for the series diverges).
Proof
Fix a countable smooth atlas detecting nullity as in [L1]. For each chart , the set is contained in the null set , so [F1] makes it null. Thus is null.
Fix a chart index and . For each , nullity of supplies cube covers with total volume at most . By [A1], choose these covers simultaneously. By [L2], their doubly indexed union is a single countable cube cover, and its total volume is at most . Hence is null.
Since step 1.2 and [L1] show that is null in .
Therefore subsets and countable unions of manifold null sets are null.
A null set has dense complement in a positive-dimensional manifold
Statement
If is a positive-dimensional smooth manifold and is null, then is dense in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A positive-dimensional smooth manifold and a null subset .
A countable chart cover detects manifold nullity (A countable chart cover detects manifold null sets).
Proof
Suppose were not dense. Then some nonempty open set would satisfy . Choose a chart with and , where .
Since , the chart image would be a null subset of by [L1]. But is a nonempty open subset of , so it contains a closed cube of positive side length and therefore cannot be null. Contradiction.
Hence every nonempty open subset of meets , so is dense.
An equidimensional map sends null sets to null sets
Statement
Let be a map between smooth manifolds of the same dimension. If is null, then is null.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A map and a null subset .
A countable chart cover detects manifold nullity (A countable chart cover detects manifold null sets).
On compact coordinate pieces a map is locally Lipschitz, and Lipschitz maps send Euclidean null sets to Euclidean null sets (A map is locally Lipschitz on compact coordinate subsets, A Lipschitz map sends null sets to null sets).
Proof
Choose countable smooth atlases on and detecting nullity by [L1]. Refine the source atlas so that each relatively compact chart domain lies inside the inverse image of one target chart domain.
For each source chart piece , the set is null in . Cover by finitely many smaller coordinate neighbourhoods on which the coordinate representative of is Lipschitz by [L2]. Applying [L2] on each such piece shows that the corresponding target-chart image of is null.
The set is the countable union of the sets . Since each has null image in every target chart from step 2.1, [L1] implies that is null in .
The image of a lower-dimensional manifold is null
Statement
Let and be smooth manifolds with , and let be a map. Then is a null subset of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A map with .
An equidimensional map sends null sets to null sets (An equidimensional map sends null sets to null sets).
A countable chart cover detects manifold nullity (A countable chart cover detects manifold null sets).
Every smooth manifold admits a countable smooth atlas with relatively compact domains (Every smooth manifold admits a countable smooth atlas with relatively compact domains).
Proof
Choose countable smooth atlases on and on as in [L3], and replace each by the countable family of intersections . It is enough to show that is null for each resulting chart domain , because those domains still cover and is the countable union of the sets .
Fix such a chart with coordinates and with for some target chart . Define The slice is a null subset of , and is . By [L1], is null.
Therefore is null in the target chart . Since the atlas on from step 1.1 detects nullity by [L2], each set is null in , and then the countable union from step 1.1 shows that is null in .
Positive-codimension immersed submanifolds are null
Statement
Every immersed submanifold of positive codimension in a smooth manifold is a null subset of the ambient manifold.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An immersed -dimensional submanifold of an -manifold with .
An immersed submanifold is locally the image of a smooth immersion from an -manifold (Immersed submanifolds).
The image of a lower-dimensional manifold is null (The image of a lower-dimensional manifold is null).
Proof
By [F1], every point of has a neighbourhood in on which is the image of a smooth immersion from an -manifold.
Because , [L1] makes each such local image null in the ambient neighbourhood. Therefore is locally null, and a countable cover of by such neighbourhoods shows that is null in .
Hence every positive-codimension immersed submanifold is null.
The critical locus and critical value set
Definition
Let be smooth. The critical locus of is
and the critical value set of is its image
Its complement is the set of regular values.
Compact null sections imply a compact set is null
Statement
Let , let , and let be compact. For each , write
If every section is a null subset of , then is a null subset of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , real numbers , and a compact set whose sections are null for every .
Euclidean nullity means that for every the set can be covered by countably many closed cubes of total volume below (Measure zero and content zero in by countable and finite cube covers).
Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number (Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than lies inside a single member of the cover).
The image of a lower-dimensional manifold is null (The image of a lower-dimensional manifold is null).
Proof
If , then is contained in the hyperplane , which is the image of the smooth map from to ; [L2] makes that hyperplane null, and hence is null. Assume henceforth that .
Fix and put . For each , [F1] supplies the following covers. [F1, given, choose] There are finitely many closed -cubes covering the compact section with total -volume below . Enlarge them slightly to open -cubes so that, with one still has Thus each section has an open finite cube cover with the stated uniform volume budget.
Since and is open, compactness of gives the following interval. [step 1.2, given, contradiction] There is an open interval about such that Otherwise one could find with and ; passing to a convergent subsequence inside the compact set yields a limit point with , contradiction.
By [L1], the cover has a Lebesgue number. Choose a finite partition of into closed intervals of positive length smaller than that number, and for each choose with . Then . For each prism , use the following subdivision. [L1, step 2.1, choose] Let and let be the side length of . If , partition the interval direction into at most pieces of length at most ; if , partition each of the base directions into at most pieces of length at most . In either case the prism is covered by finitely many closed -cubes of total volume at most These cubes cover , and their total volume is at most By [F1], is null.
Therefore compact null sections imply the whole compact set is null.
Sard on the nonflat critical strata
Statement
Let , let be open, let be , and for define
If , is compact, and the Morse-Sard conclusion is already known for maps from open subsets of to , then is null.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , a map , an integer , and a compact set .
If a Euclidean map has invertible derivative at a point, it becomes a coordinate there after shrinking (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).
Proof
Fix . [L1, given, choose] Because , some partial derivative of order of some component of is nonzero at . After reordering coordinates and components, choose a multi-index with and a component such that, for
one has . Since is , [L1] applied to
gives a neighbourhood of and a diffeomorphism from onto an open set .
Every point of lies in , so vanishes there by definition of . [step 1.1, algebra] Hence
Define
This map is . If , then and , so . Therefore
so is a critical point of . The induction hypothesis therefore gives that
is a null subset of .
Finitely many neighbourhoods cover the compact set , so is a finite union of null sets and therefore null.
Sard on the infinitely flat critical stratum
Statement
Let and , let be open, and let be with . Let
If is compact, then is null in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers , a map with , and a compact set .
The multivariable Taylor formula with Lagrange remainder expresses the order- remainder using the order- derivatives at points of the joining segment (Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment).
A continuous map on a compact metric space is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous).
Euclidean nullity is proved by box covers of arbitrarily small total volume (Measure zero and content zero in by countable and finite cube covers).
Proof
If , then has at most one point and is finite, hence null in by cubes of arbitrarily small side. Assume henceforth that . For each , choose nested closed cubes with and having in its interior. Compactness gives finitely many inner cubes whose interiors cover . It suffices to prove that each is null, because finite unions of Euclidean null sets are null directly from the cube-cover definition [F1].
Fix one pair , let , and let be the side length of . The finitely many order- partial derivatives of the components of are uniformly continuous on the compact cube by [L2]. Since they vanish at every , applying [L1] componentwise with degree shows that for every there is a single such that whenever , , and .
Fix . If , choose so small that ; if , choose any . Let be furnished by step 2.1, and choose so large that the congruent subcubes in the subdivision of into cubes have diameter below . Use the following target cubes. [step 2.1, choose, cases] For each subcube meeting , choose a point . If , then , so step 2.1 gives Hence lies in an -cube of side length at most
The union of those target cubes covers , and its total -volume has the following bound. [F1, step 3.1, cases, algebra] It is at most If , increase until this quantity is below ; if , the choice of in step 3.1 already makes it smaller than . In either case the total covering volume is below . Therefore [F1] implies that is null.
Applying step 4.1 to the finite cover from step 1.1 shows that is null. Thus the infinitely flat critical stratum has null image.
Morse-Sard for Euclidean maps
Statement
Let , let be open, and let be a map with
Then the critical value set of is a null subset of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and a map with .
The critical value set is the image of the critical locus (The critical locus and critical value set).
Compact null sections reassemble into a null set, and the nonflat and flat critical strata have null images under the hypotheses of the preceding lemmas (Compact null sections imply a compact set is null, Sard on the nonflat critical strata, Sard on the infinitely flat critical stratum).
If a Euclidean map has invertible derivative at a point, it becomes a coordinate there after shrinking (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).
Proof
If , then is at most a point, so is [F1, given, choose, cases] finite and is finite. Every finite subset of is null, so the theorem follows. Assume henceforth that . Exhaust by countably many compact cubes with interiors contained in . It is enough to show that is null for every , because the critical value set in [F1] is the countable union of those images.
Fix one cube and put [L1, step 1.1, algebra] Then For each and each , the set is compact and contained in . Because the nonflat lemma in [L1] shows that is null. Also, the set is compact, and the hypothesis implies ; thus the flat lemma in [L1] makes null.
It remains to show that is null. [L1, L2, step 1.1, algebra] If , then a linear map is surjective exactly when it is nonzero, so and there is nothing to prove. Assume , and fix . Some first partial derivative of some component of is nonzero at ; after reordering coordinates and components, assume By [L2], after shrinking choose a neighbourhood of and a diffeomorphism from onto an open set . Write Each slice map is , and because the induction hypothesis applies to those maps. If , then in these coordinates the differential of has block form so is critical for exactly when is a critical point of the slice . Now choose an open neighbourhood of with compact closure . The compact set has sections contained in the critical value sets of the slice maps, hence null in by induction. Applying the slicing lemma in [L1] shows that is null in . A countable subcover of by the neighbourhoods therefore makes null.
Step 2.1 shows that is null for every [F1, step 2.1, step 2.2, step 1.1] and that is null, while step 2.2 handles . Hence is null. Applying step 1.1 shows that the whole critical value set of is null.
Morse-Sard for smooth manifolds
Statement
Let be a smooth map between smooth manifolds. Then the critical value set of is a null subset of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map .
The empty fibre case is regular, so if every differential is surjective then every value of is regular (Regular and critical points and values).
The empty subset of any manifold is null (Null subsets of a smooth manifold).
The critical value set is the image of the critical locus (The critical locus and critical value set).
A countable chart cover detects manifold nullity, and countable unions of manifold null sets are null (A countable chart cover detects manifold null sets, Countable unions and subsets of manifold null sets are null).
In Euclidean charts, the critical value set of a smooth map is null (Morse-Sard for Euclidean maps).
Proof
If , then every differential [F1, F2, given, cases] is surjective, so [F1] makes every value of regular. Thus the critical value set is empty, which is null by [F2]. Assume henceforth that .
Choose countable smooth atlases on and [L1, step 1.1, given, choose] on detecting nullity by [L1], and refine the source atlas so that each lies in some .
For each , the coordinate representative [L2, step 2.1, algebra]
is smooth between Euclidean open sets with positive-dimensional target. A point of is critical for exactly when its coordinate representative is critical for , because the chart maps have invertible differentials. By [L2], the critical value set of is null in . Therefore is null for every .
By [F3], the critical value set of is the countable union of the sets [F3, L1, step 3.1] , so [L1] shows that it is null in .
Regular values have null complement and are dense
Statement
For a smooth map , the complement of the regular values is a null subset of . In particular, the regular values are dense in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map .
The complement of the regular values is the critical value set (The critical locus and critical value set).
The critical value set is null (Morse-Sard for smooth manifolds).
In a positive-dimensional manifold, a null set has dense complement (A null set has dense complement in a positive-dimensional manifold).
Proof
By [F1] and [L1], the complement of the regular values is null in .
If , [L2] implies that the complement of that null set is dense. If , then is discrete and every value is regular because the target tangent spaces are zero, so the regular-value set is all of and is certainly dense.
Therefore regular values have null complement and are dense.
The critical value set of a smooth map is sigma-compact
Statement
For a smooth map , the critical value set is a -compact subset of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map .
The critical value set is the image of the critical locus (The critical locus and critical value set).
The submersion locus is open, so the critical locus is closed; every manifold has a compact exhaustion; and continuous images of compact sets are compact (The immersion and submersion loci are open, Every manifold has a compact exhaustion, The image of a compact metric space under a continuous map is compact, and so is the image of any compact subset).
Proof
By [L1], the critical locus is closed in . Let be a compact exhaustion of from [L1].
Then is compact for every , so [L1] makes compact in .
By [F1], so is a countable union of compact sets.
Regular values form a dense set
Statement
For a smooth map , the set of regular values is a dense subset of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map .
The critical value set is -compact (The critical value set of a smooth map is sigma-compact).
Regular values are dense, and the critical value set is null (Regular values have null complement and are dense).
Proof
By [L1], write the critical value set as with each compact.
If , then [L2] makes each a compact null set, hence it has empty interior. Therefore is open and dense. The regular-value set is so it is a dense . If , then [L2] already says every value is regular, so the regular-value set is all of , again a dense .
Therefore regular values form a dense set.
A smooth map from lower to higher dimension cannot be surjective
Statement
If is smooth and , then is not surjective onto any nonempty .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map with and .
The image of a lower-dimensional manifold is null (The image of a lower-dimensional manifold is null).
In a positive-dimensional manifold, a null set has dense complement (A null set has dense complement in a positive-dimensional manifold).
Proof
By [L1], is a null subset of . Since , the target dimension is positive.
If were surjective, then would be null in itself. But [L2] would then force its complement to be dense in , impossible because is nonempty.
Hence cannot be surjective.
Transverse linear subspaces
Definition
Let be a finite-dimensional real vector space, and let be linear subspaces. They are transverse, written , when
Equivalently,
A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold
Definition
Let be smooth, and let be an embedded submanifold. Then is transverse to , written , when for every ,
If , this condition is vacuous, so still holds.
Transverse smooth maps
Definition
Let and be smooth maps. They are transverse, written , when for every pair with ,
Transverse embedded submanifolds
Definition
Let be embedded submanifolds. They are transverse, written , when their inclusion maps into are transverse. Equivalently, for every ,
Transversality is equivalent to surjectivity on the normal quotient
Statement
Let be smooth, let be an embedded submanifold, and let with . Then is transverse to at if and only if the composite
is surjective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map , an embedded submanifold , and a point with .
Transversality at means (A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold).
The normal space of at is the quotient (Normal and conormal bundles of an embedded submanifold).
Proof
Let be the quotient map from [F2]. Its kernel is exactly . Therefore if and only if .
By [F1], the right-hand condition in step 1.1 is exactly transversality of to at .
Hence transversality is equivalent to surjectivity on the normal quotient.
The transverse preimage theorem
Statement
Let be smooth and let be an embedded submanifold of codimension . If , then is an embedded submanifold of of codimension . For each ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold .
Embedded submanifolds admit local defining submersions (Embedded submanifolds admit local defining submersions).
Transversality to is equivalent to surjectivity on the normal quotient (Transversality is equivalent to surjectivity on the normal quotient).
A regular level set is an embedded submanifold, and its tangent space is the kernel of the defining submersion differential (A regular level set is an embedded submanifold, The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel).
Proof
Fix and put . By [L1], choose a neighbourhood of and a submersion such that .
At , the differential kills exactly . Therefore [L2] implies that is surjective. So is a regular value of near .
Since , [L3] shows that this set is an embedded codimension- submanifold near , with tangent space
Because was arbitrary, these local models glue to an embedded submanifold structure on with the stated tangent-space formula.
Transverse embedded submanifolds intersect in the expected codimension
Statement
If are transverse embedded submanifolds of codimensions and , then is an embedded submanifold of codimension . At each ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Embedded submanifolds with .
Two embedded submanifolds are transverse exactly when their inclusion maps are transverse (Transverse embedded submanifolds).
The transverse preimage theorem identifies the preimage tangent space with the inverse image of the target tangent space (The transverse preimage theorem).
Proof
Let be the inclusion. By [F1], . Since , [L1] shows that is an embedded submanifold of of codimension .
Therefore The tangent-space formula from [L1] becomes
Hence transverse embedded submanifolds intersect in the expected codimension.
Transverse fibre products are embedded submanifolds
Statement
Let and be smooth and transverse. Then the fibre product
is an embedded submanifold of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Smooth maps and with .
Two smooth maps are transverse when their differential images span the target tangent space at every coincidence point (Transverse smooth maps).
The diagonal is an embedded submanifold (The diagonal is an embedded submanifold).
Products of smooth maps are smooth, and the transverse preimage theorem applies to a map transverse to an embedded submanifold (Restrictions, corestrictions, and products of smooth maps are smooth, The transverse preimage theorem).
Proof
Define by . By [L2], is smooth, and
At a point with , the tangent space to is . Therefore transversality of to means that every pair can be written as This is equivalent to , which is exactly [F1].
Hence , so [L2] applied with [L1] shows that is an embedded submanifold of .
A submersion is transverse to every embedded submanifold
Statement
If is a submersion, then for every embedded submanifold .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A submersion and an embedded submanifold .
A submersion has surjective differential at every point (Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps).
Transversality to means at each point of (A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold).
Proof
Let . By [F1], .
Therefore , so [F2] gives at .
Since was arbitrary, is transverse to every embedded submanifold.
Transversality to a point is the regular-value condition
Statement
For a smooth map and a point , the condition is equivalent to saying that is a regular value of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map and a point .
Transversality to means for every (A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold).
A regular value is one whose fibre points are all regular points, and regular points are exactly the submersion points (Regular and critical points and values).
Proof
Because , [F1] says that exactly when for every .
The condition in step 1.1 is precisely that every fibre point is a submersion point, which [F2] identifies with being a regular value.
Therefore transversality to a point is the regular-value condition.
Transversality is invariant under diffeomorphic change of source and target
Statement
Let and be diffeomorphisms.
- If and are transverse, then and are transverse.
- If is an embedded submanifold and , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Diffeomorphisms and as above.
Transversality is defined by spanning conditions on differential images and target tangent spaces (Transverse smooth maps, A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold).
Differentials obey the chain rule, and the differential of a diffeomorphism is an isomorphism (The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps, The differential of a diffeomorphism is an isomorphism).
Proof
By [L1], the differentials , , and their inverses are linear isomorphisms. Applying the chain rule to the composite maps multiplies the original differentials by these isomorphisms on the source and target sides.
A linear isomorphism preserves the property that a sum of subspaces is the whole target space. Therefore the spanning conditions in [F1] hold for the original maps exactly when they hold for the conjugated maps.
Hence both notions of transversality are invariant under diffeomorphic changes of source and target.
An -dimensional submanifold transverse to vertical fibres is locally a graph
Statement
Let be an embedded submanifold with , and let . If is transverse at to the vertical fibre , then there exist neighbourhoods of and of and a smooth map such that
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An embedded submanifold with , transverse to the vertical fibre at .
Transversality of embedded submanifolds means that their tangent spaces span the ambient tangent space at the intersection point (Transverse embedded submanifolds).
A smooth map with invertible differential at a point is a local diffeomorphism there (The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds).
Proof
Let be the first projection. A tangent vector lies in the kernel of exactly when it is tangent to the vertical fibre . By [F1], transversality gives so is surjective. Because , this surjective linear map is an isomorphism.
Therefore [L1] gives neighbourhoods of and of such that is a diffeomorphism. Shrinking in the product if necessary, write for some neighbourhood of .
Define . Then so is locally the graph of .
A globally one-to-one transverse-fibre submanifold is a graph
Statement
Let be an embedded submanifold. Assume:
- for every , the vertical fibre meets in exactly one point; and
- is transverse to every vertical fibre it meets.
Then there is a unique smooth map with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An embedded submanifold satisfying the two displayed hypotheses.
The transverse intersection theorem controls the dimension of the intersection with a vertical fibre (Transverse embedded submanifolds intersect in the expected codimension).
Once , the local graph proposition applies to each vertical fibre intersection (An -dimensional submanifold transverse to vertical fibres is locally a graph).
A diffeomorphism is a bijective smooth map with smooth inverse (Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds).
Proof
Let . The fibre hypothesis gives . Because that intersection is a single point, it is -dimensional. The vertical fibre has codimension in , so [L1] forces , hence .
Let be the restriction of the first projection. By the fibre hypothesis, is bijective. Since step 1.1 gives and is transverse to every vertical fibre it meets, [L2] shows that every point of has a neighbourhood on which is a diffeomorphism onto an open set of .
The local inverses from step 2.1 agree on overlaps because is globally one-to-one. Therefore they glue to a smooth inverse , so [L3] makes a diffeomorphism.
Define . Then every point of has the form , and uniqueness of the point in each fibre shows that no other point lies over . Hence , uniquely.
Smooth families of maps and their evaluation maps
Definition
Let , , and be smooth manifolds. A smooth family of maps from to parametrized by is a smooth map
For each , its slice map is
The map itself is the evaluation map of the family.
Parametric transversality
Statement
Let be a smooth family of maps and let be an embedded submanifold. If , then the set of parameters for which the slice fails to be transverse to is a null subset of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth family transverse to an embedded submanifold .
The slice maps come from the evaluation map (Smooth families of maps and their evaluation maps).
Transversality to an embedded submanifold means a tangent-space spanning condition at each point of the preimage (A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold).
The preimage is an embedded submanifold, and for the projection , regular values are dense outside a null set (The transverse preimage theorem, Morse-Sard for smooth manifolds).
Proof
Because , [L1] makes an embedded submanifold. Let be the restriction of the second projection.
Fix and write . The fibre of over is which identifies with by [F1]. A pair lies in exactly when , so is surjective exactly when every admits some with .
If at , then [F2] gives For any , choose so that . Then , so step 2.1 makes a submersion at .
Conversely, assume is a submersion at . Given , the transversality of in [F2] gives and with . By step 2.1 choose with , so . Then which is exactly the transversality condition for at .
Therefore is a regular value of if and only if the slice is transverse to at every point of its fibre. Applying the Sard statement in [L1] to shows that the bad parameters form a null subset of .
Generic translations of a Euclidean-valued map are transverse
Statement
Let be smooth and let be an embedded submanifold. Then the set of for which the translated map
fails to be transverse to is a null subset of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map and an embedded submanifold .
Parametric transversality applies to a smooth family whose evaluation map is transverse to (Parametric transversality).
A submersion is transverse to every embedded submanifold (A submersion is transverse to every embedded submanifold).
Proof
Define the smooth family by . Its slice at is exactly .
The differential of in the parameter direction is the identity on , so is a submersion. Therefore [L2] gives .
Applying [L1] to this family shows that the nontransverse parameters form a null subset of .
Outside a null set every translation makes a chosen value a transverse zero
Statement
Let be smooth and let . Then outside a null subset of , the map has as a regular value.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map and a point .
For the point submanifold , generic translations are transverse to it outside a null set (Generic translations of a Euclidean-valued map are transverse).
Transversality to a point is the regular-value condition (Transversality to a point is the regular-value condition).
Proof
Apply [L1] with . Then outside a null subset of , the translated map is transverse to .
By [L2], is equivalent to being a regular value of .
Therefore outside a null set of translations, the chosen value becomes a transverse zero.
Transversality is stable on a compact source
Statement
Let be compact, let be a closed embedded submanifold, and let be smooth with . Then every smooth map sufficiently close to in the topology is also transverse to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact manifold , a closed embedded submanifold , and a smooth map with .
Transversality at a point is equivalent to surjectivity of the induced map to the normal quotient (Transversality is equivalent to surjectivity on the normal quotient).
Embedded submanifolds admit local defining submersions, and the submersion locus is open (Embedded submanifolds admit local defining submersions, The immersion and submersion loci are open).
Proof
If , closedness of gives a neighbourhood of disjoint from . Shrink to a relatively compact neighbourhood of with . Every map sufficiently -close to on still maps into , so transversality there is vacuous.
If , choose a neighbourhood of and a defining submersion for by [L1]. Because , the composite is a submersion at by [F1]. In source and target coordinates, some minor of is nonzero at . Shrink to a relatively compact so that and this minor stays nonzero on , using the fixed-map openness in [L1]. If is sufficiently -close to on , then and the corresponding minor of remains nonzero. Thus is a submersion on , and there.
The sets from steps 1.1 and 1.2 cover the compact manifold , so a finite subcover suffices. Intersect the corresponding finitely many neighbourhoods of . Any in that intersection is transverse to on each , hence on all of .
Therefore transversality is stable on a compact source in the topology.
Critical points need not be isolated
Statement
False claim: every critical point of a smooth map is isolated.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The constant smooth map , .
The critical locus is the set of nonregular points (The critical locus and critical value set).
Refutation
The differential of is zero at every point and is not surjective onto , so every point of is critical.
The critical locus is therefore all of , which has no isolated points. This is the critical locus from [F1].
Therefore critical points need not be isolated.
The critical-value set need not be closed
Statement
False claim: the critical value set of a smooth map is always closed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth bump supported in with , , and for , together with the smooth map
A sigma-compact set need not be closed, and regular values can be dense despite the presence of critical values accumulating at them (The critical value set of a smooth map is sigma-compact, Regular values form a dense set).
Refutation
The supports of the summands are pairwise disjoint, so the series defines a smooth function. At each center , the derivative is zero and Thus every value is a critical value.
The sequence converges to . But for every , because every summand has height strictly below and outside the supports the function is . Hence is a regular value with empty fibre, not a critical value.
Therefore the critical value set contains but not its limit , so it is not closed. This is consistent with [L1].
Sard's theorem does not hold for every map
Statement
False claim: Sard's theorem remains true for every map between arbitrary dimensions.
The differentiability threshold in Morse-Sard for Euclidean maps is real. Standard source treatments record Whitney's construction of a map whose critical values contain a set of positive measure, so the naive form of Sard fails once the hypothesis is dropped.
Intersecting submanifolds need not be transverse
Statement
False claim: any two embedded submanifolds with nonempty intersection are transverse.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: In , the embedded submanifolds and .
Transversality means that the tangent spaces span the ambient tangent space at each intersection point (Transverse embedded submanifolds).
Refutation
The intersection is all of , so it is nonempty.
At every point , one has . Their sum is still the -axis, not . Thus [F1] fails.
Therefore nonempty intersection does not force transversality.
A preimage need not be a submanifold without transversality
Statement
False claim: the preimage of every embedded submanifold under a smooth map is again a submanifold.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The smooth map , , and the embedded submanifold .
The transverse preimage theorem needs transversality to conclude the preimage is a submanifold (The transverse preimage theorem).
Refutation
The preimage is the union of the two coordinate axes.
At the origin this set has two distinct tangent directions, so no neighbourhood of is diffeomorphic to an open interval or to a point. Hence it is not a -dimensional or -dimensional embedded submanifold there. This is exactly the failure excluded by the hypothesis in [L1].
Therefore a preimage need not be a submanifold when transversality is dropped.
Uniform openness of transversality fails on arbitrary noncompact sources
Statement
False claim: if is noncompact and is transverse to an embedded submanifold , then every map uniformly -close to is still transverse to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The map , , the point submanifold , a smooth bump with support in , , and .
Compact-source openness is the honest theorem (Transversality is stable on a compact source).
Refutation
The map never meets , so it is vacuously transverse to . For each integer , define Then and .
The differences and are supported in , and their sup norms are bounded by constants times . Hence in the uniform topology.
But step 1.1 gives a critical zero of at , so is not transverse to by the regular-value criterion. Therefore no uniform neighbourhood of consists entirely of transverse maps. This agrees with [L1], which required compact source.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.