How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniform openness of transversality fails on arbitrary noncompact sources
Statement
False claim: if is noncompact and is transverse to an embedded submanifold , then every map uniformly -close to is still transverse to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The map , , the point submanifold , a smooth bump with support in , , and .
Compact-source openness is the honest theorem (Transversality is stable on a compact source).
Refutation
The map never meets , so it is vacuously transverse to . For each integer , define Then and .
The differences and are supported in , and their sup norms are bounded by constants times . Hence in the uniform topology.
But step 1.1 gives a critical zero of at , so is not transverse to by the regular-value criterion. Therefore no uniform neighbourhood of consists entirely of transverse maps. This agrees with [L1], which required compact source.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Marco Gualtieri, Topology I: Smooth Manifolds, cumulative notes (standard reference, not scraped)