How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A smooth map from lower to higher dimension cannot be surjective
Statement
If is smooth and , then is not surjective onto any nonempty .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map with and .
The image of a lower-dimensional manifold is null (The image of a lower-dimensional manifold is null).
In a positive-dimensional manifold, a null set has dense complement (A null set has dense complement in a positive-dimensional manifold).
Proof
By [L1], is a null subset of . Since , the target dimension is positive.
If were surjective, then would be null in itself. But [L2] would then force its complement to be dense in , impossible because is nonempty.
Hence cannot be surjective.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Marco Gualtieri, Topology I: Smooth Manifolds, cumulative notes (standard reference, not scraped)