How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transversality is equivalent to surjectivity on the normal quotient
Statement
Let be smooth, let be an embedded submanifold, and let with . Then is transverse to at if and only if the composite
is surjective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth map , an embedded submanifold , and a point with .
Transversality at means (A smooth map transverse to an embedded submanifold).
The normal space of at is the quotient (Normal and conormal bundles of an embedded submanifold).
Proof
Let be the quotient map from [F2]. Its kernel is exactly . Therefore if and only if .
By [F1], the right-hand condition in step 1.1 is exactly transversality of to at .
Hence transversality is equivalent to surjectivity on the normal quotient.
Depends on
Used by
- Transversality is stable on a compact source Proposition
- The transverse preimage theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)