Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Transverse preimages carry the pulled-back normal structure

Statement

Let E→B be a smooth real vector bundle of rank r, let Th⁡(E) be its Thom space and let 0B⊂Th⁡(E) be the image of the zero section. Let f:X→Th⁡(E) be continuous and smooth on an open neighbourhood W of P=f−1(0B), with f(W) contained in the smooth nonbasepoint stratum; write f in a bundle chart of E as (g,h), with fibre coordinate h. Say that f is transverse to the zero section when dhx is surjective for every x∈P. Then, assuming the countable-choice hypothesis ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) used only for the smooth normal-bundle structure of P in X:

(i) If X is boundaryless, P is an embedded submanifold of X of codimension r, with TxP=ker⁡dhx for every x∈P;

(ii) In the boundaryless case, df induces a specified smooth bundle isomorphism ν(P⊂X)→(g∣P)∗E, where g∣P is the composite of f∣P with the identification 0B≅B, and a change of bundle chart acts on this isomorphism by the transition matrix;

For a general source, (i) and (ii) apply first to P∩Int⁡X.

(iii) If X has boundary, if f∣∂X is smooth near P∩∂X and transverse to the zero section there as well, then P is a neat embedded submanifold of X with ∂P=P∩∂X, the tangent formula of (i) holds at boundary points, and the isomorphism of (ii) restricts over ∂P to the corresponding isomorphism for ∂P⊂∂X;

(iv) For every r≥0, the image 0B is closed in Th⁡(E), so P is closed in X and compact whenever X is compact. In rank zero, Th⁡(E)=B+ with its disjoint basepoint, and 0B=B is both closed and open; thus P is clopen. Empty bases are included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth rank-r bundle E→B, and a map f:X→Th⁡(E) continuous and smooth with values in the nonbasepoint stratum near P=f−1(0B), transverse to the zero section in the sense of the statement.

[F1]

Disk bundle, sphere bundle, and Thom space: the differential topology interface identifies the nonbasepoint stratum of Th⁡(E) with the total space E by a diffeomorphism, and 0B with the zero section.

[F2]

Transversality is equivalent to surjectivity on the normal quotient identifies transversality to an embedded submanifold with surjectivity of the derivative onto the normal quotient.

[F3]

The transverse preimage theorem makes the transverse preimage of an embedded submanifold an embedded submanifold of the stated codimension, with tangent space the inverse image of the target tangent space.

[F4]

Pullback vector bundles and sections defines the pullback bundle.

[F5]

Under ACω, the normal bundle ν(P⊂X) of an embedded submanifold is a smooth vector bundle (Assuming countable choice, normal and conormal bundles are smooth vector bundles).

[F6]

A smooth Euclidean map with invertible derivative has a smooth local inverse (Choice-free smooth inverse function theorem in Euclidean space).

[F7]

A smooth map on a relatively open subset of a half-space admits a smooth Euclidean extension near each of its points (Smooth functions on relatively open half-space sets).

[F8]

Neatness of an embedded submanifold with boundary means S∩∂X=∂S and transversality to ∂X (Neat submanifolds of a manifold with boundary).

[A1]

Countable choice is The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω); it enters only through [F5].

Proof

1.1F1F2given

Around x∈P choose a bundle chart of E over U⊆B and use [F1] to view it as a smooth chart of the target near f(x); on W write f=(g,h) with h valued in Rr and g valued in U, so that P∩W=h−1(0) and the normal space of the zero section at f(x) is identified with the fibre Eg(x)=Rr. By [F2] applied to the smooth map f∣W and the embedded zero section, transversality at x is exactly surjectivity of dhx. If another trivialization replaces h by T(g(x))h(x) with T a smooth invertible matrix function, then at h=0 its derivative is T(g(x)) dhx, so surjectivity is chart-independent and the transition acts on the normal quotient by the same matrix.

2.1F3step 1.1

Restricted to W∩Int⁡X, the map f takes values in the smooth stratum and, by step 1.1, is transverse to the embedded zero section there. The published transverse preimage theorem [F3] therefore makes P an embedded submanifold of codimension r of that open set, with TxP={v∈TxX:dfx(v)∈Tf(x)0B}=ker⁡dhx. Since the interior points of P are covered by these open sets, the interior part of P is an embedded submanifold with the asserted tangent space.

3.1F4F5step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The differential dhx factors through the quotient to a linear isomorphism TxX/TxP→Eg(x). Step 1.1 shows that these local isomorphisms transform by exactly the transition matrices of E, so they glue to a smooth bundle isomorphism ν(P⊂X)→(g∣P)∗E over P∩Int⁡X; smoothness of the normal bundle is [F5].

4.1F6F7F8step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Let x∈P∩∂X and use boundary coordinates (u,t) with t≥0. By [F7], the fibre coordinate h(u,t) extends smoothly across t=0 near x. Boundary transversality says duh(u,0) is surjective at x; hence, after reordering the n−1 tangential coordinates, an r×r minor in the first r coordinates of u is invertible. The map (u,t)↦(h(u,t),ur+1,…,un−1,t) has invertible derivative, so [F6] makes it a local diffeomorphism. Its last coordinate is exactly the original t, so it maps the source half-space to {t≥0}, without assuming an arbitrary nonlinear image of a half-space is linear. In these coordinates P is precisely {h=0,t≥0}, with boundary {h=0,t=0}, and its tangent space is ker⁡dh. These charts prove neateness. The same local normal quotient map as step 3.1 is a smooth bundle isomorphism at boundary points, and Tx∂X/Tx∂P→TxX/TxP is an isomorphism since dh∣Tx∂X is surjective. Thus its restriction is exactly the boundary normal identification. When r=0, the coordinate map is the identity and the same conclusion holds.

5.1F1A1givenalgebra∎

For r>0 and nonempty B, the zero section is closed in D(E) and disjoint from S(E); its saturation under the sphere collapse is itself, so the quotient topology makes its image closed. Passing to the compactly generated topology preserves this closed set. If r=0, [F1] uses the based empty-subspace quotient B/∅=B+, so B and its added isolated basepoint are separate clopen pieces. Thus 0B is closed for every rank, and P=f−1(0B) is closed and therefore compact for compact X; in rank zero it is also open. For empty B, 0B=∅ and every conclusion is vacuous. No choice beyond [A1] is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources