Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Transverse based homotopies give normal cobordisms

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice) and let E→B be a smooth real vector bundle of rank r≥0. Let X be a compact smooth manifold without boundary and H:X×I→Th⁡(E) a based homotopy constant in the time variable on neighbourhoods of t=0 and t=1.

(a) If H is smooth on an open neighbourhood of its zero-section preimage W=H−1(0B) and transverse to the zero section there, then W is a compact neat embedded submanifold of X×I with ∂W=W0⊔W1, where Wi=Hi−1(0B), and the normal bundle of W in X×I is identified with the pullback of E along the base-coordinate map of H; thus W is a compact normal cobordism between W0 and W1.

(b) If H is merely continuous with H0,H1 smooth and transverse to the zero section near their zero preimages, then for every closed F⊆X×I with F∩W=∅ there is a based homotopy from H0 to H1, fixed on X×{0} and X×{1} and pointwise on F, which is smooth and transverse to the zero section near its own zero preimage; only a neighbourhood of the zero section is smoothed or perturbed, and the Thom basepoint need not be smooth.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The compact source, the smooth rank-r bundle with r≥0, and the homotopy as in (a) or (b).

[F1]

Transverse preimages carry the pulled-back normal structure gives the preimage, its normal structure and its boundary behaviour for a map smooth and transverse near the zero preimage of a boundaryless target stratum, including the neat-boundary case.

[F2]

Relative Whitney approximation for manifold-valued maps supplies, under countable choice, a smoothing of a continuous map that is smooth near a closed set, and a homotopy to it fixed on a neighbourhood of that set.

[F3]

Relative Whitney approximation for Euclidean-valued maps supplies Euclidean approximations of a continuous map with arbitrarily small prescribed pointwise error.

[F4]

A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set supplies a smooth bump equal to 1 on a compact set and supported in a prescribed open neighbourhood.

[F5]

A smooth map f:M→N between boundaryless manifolds admits a smooth finite-dimensional family F:M×B→N, B an open ball containing0, with F0=f and each parameter map a↦F(p,a) a submersion (A tubular target produces a submersive finite-dimensional perturbation family).

[F6]

Under countable choice, the parameters of a family whose evaluation map is transverse to an embedded submanifold for which the slice fails to be transverse form a null subset of the ball (Parametric transversality), and a null subset of a positive-dimensional ball has dense complement (A null set has dense complement in a positive-dimensional manifold).

[F7]

Continuity is local on any open cover; maps on a finite closed cover agreeing on overlaps also paste to a continuous map (Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous).

[F8]

Under countable choice, The weak Whitney proper embedding theorem gives a proper smooth Euclidean embedding of any smooth manifold, and A closed Euclidean submanifold has a smooth neighborhood retraction gives a smooth retraction of an open neighbourhood of its closed image.

[A1]

AC is The Axiom of Choice; it is used through [F1] for the smooth normal-bundle structure, and through [F2], [F3], [F5], [F6] and [F8], all of which require only countable choice.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

In case (a), F1 makes W closed and compact for every rank. The collars are constant in time. At their zero points the fibre differential has zero time component, so surjectivity of the full fibre differential is exactly surjectivity on the X directions; hence the boundary restrictions are transverse as well. Apply F1 to the smooth neighbourhood of W in X×I: W is neat, ∂W=W0⊔W1, and its specified normal isomorphism is the pullback of E and restricts to the endpoint normal isomorphisms. This is the asserted compact normal cobordism.

1.2F1F2F7A1givenconstruct

For case (b), if W=∅, retain H; smoothness and transversality near the empty zero preimage are vacuous and F is untouched. If r=0, the zero stratum B is clopen in B+ by F1. For each x, the inverse image of B under the continuous time path is clopen in the connected interval, so it is either all of I or empty. Thus W=W0×I, with W0 clopen in compact X, and F lies in its complement. Extend H∣W0×I constantly past both endpoints to W0×(−1,2)→B. This map is smooth on endpoint time collars because H0,H1 are smooth near their whole zero preimages W0. Apply [F2] relative to the closed union of smaller extended endpoint collars to obtain a smooth map into B and a homotopy fixed there. Restrict to W0×I and paste with the unchanged basepoint map on the clopen complement, using [F7]. This gives (b), fixes F pointwise and all original basepoint values, and stays constant on smaller endpoint collars. Transversality to the rank-zero zero section, the entire smooth stratum, is automatic. This includes W0=X and W0=∅; empty B was already covered by W=∅.

1.3F1F4givenconstruct

Now assume r>0 and W≠∅. Choose 0<δ<1/4 so H is constant in time on [0,δ] and [1−δ,1]. Choose open neighbourhoods Oi of Wi in X where Hi is smooth with values in E. On the boundaryless source X×(0,1) choose an open set U containing its part of W, disjoint from F, with H(U)⊆E, and such that U∩{t≤δ/2}⊆O0×(0,δ) and U∩{t≥1−δ/2}⊆O1×(1−δ,1). Such U is obtained by intersecting H−1(E)∖F with the open collar/central unions; it contains the interior zeros since collar zeros lie in Oi. Set J=[δ/4,1−δ/4]. The set K=W∩(X×J) is compact, unlike the entire interior part of W. Choose a compact neighbourhood C of K and open V with K⊆int⁡C⊆C⊆V and V‾⊆U compact. The bump in [F4] gives a smooth λ equal to one on a neighbourhood of C, supported in V. Its zero extension is smooth and vanishes near the endpoints and on F.

2.1F1F3F8step 1.3choose

Apply [F8] to the smooth total space E to obtain a proper embedding j:E↪Rd. Its image j(E) is closed, so [F8] supplies a smooth retraction ρ:T→j(E) on an open neighbourhood T; set R=j−1ρ:T→E, with Rj=id⁡. The relative approximation [F3] is applied on U to jH with closed protected set A=U∩({t≤δ/3}∪{t≥1−δ/3}). It is smooth near A by step 1.3. Define the compact relevant buffer Q=(V‾∖int⁡C)∩(X×J). It misses W because K⊆int⁡C; thus jH(Q) lies in the open set T0=R−1(E∖0B). Choose a positive continuous error function on U smaller than half the distance of jH(p) to Rd∖T, and uniformly small enough that every error ball over Q lies in T0; compactness of jH(Q) supplies this uniform bound. Empty complements or empty Q require only any fixed positive bound. Then [F3] gives smooth Ψ with this error, equal to jH on a neighbourhood of A.

3.1F3F7F8step 1.3step 2.1construct

On U set χs(p)=jH(p)+sλ(p)(Ψ(p)−jH(p)) for 0≤s≤1. Its distance from jH(p) is bounded by the prescribed error, so the whole segment stays in T; over Q it stays in T0. Define the alteration by Rχs on U and H off supp⁡λ. These are an open cover and agree on overlaps, so [F7] gives a continuous homotopy. It fixes F, the endpoints and every original basepoint value, since the compact support lies in U and away from them. Put H^=Rχ1 on U with the same extension. It is smooth on a neighbourhood of C, where λ=1, and has no zeros in Q. Every zero of H^ with time in J therefore lies in int⁡C: outside V it is an original zero in K, and inside the buffer it is excluded. For times outside J, the approximation equals jH wherever it acts by the protected set A, so H^=H there and collar zeros remain smooth and transverse. No claim that all interior-time zeros form a compact set was used.

4.1F1F4F5step 3.1choose

The compact set K^=H^−1(0B)∩(X×J) lies in M=int⁡C. If it is empty, H^ is already transverse near every zero, all of which are protected collar zeros. Otherwise choose a compact neighbourhood L of K^ inside M and choose an open V1 with L⊆V1⊆V‾1⊆M and V‾1 compact, and use [F4] to obtain a smooth η:M→[0,1] equal to one near L, supported in V1. Its support S is consequently compact and contained in M. Choose an open O containing K^ with O‾⊆int⁡L. Apply [F5] to the smooth H^:M→E to obtain F:M×Bpar→E, with F(p,0)=H^(p) and each parameter map submersive. Shrink its ball to one centred at zero. Since M≠∅ and dim⁡E≥r>0, parameter submersivity forces positive parameter dimension.

5.1F1F5step 4.1algebraconstruct

Set G(p,a)=F(p,η(p)a) on M×Bpar. It is smooth even at η=0. On {η>0} its derivative in parameter directions is η(p)DaF(p,η(p)a), surjective by the actual parameter-map assertion of [F5]; thus its evaluation is submersive and transverse to 0B. The compact central buffer D=(S∖O)∩(X×J) contains no zero of H^. By continuity of the family and compactness of D, there is a ball Bsmall about0 within Bpar such that G(p,a)∉0B for every p∈D and a∈Bsmall; if D is empty any sufficiently small ball suffices. This bound also holds along sa for 0≤s≤1. The old buffer Q is unchanged since η is supported inside C.

6.1F5F6F7step 4.1step 5.1choose

Apply [F6] to G∣{η>0}×Bpar. Its bad parameters form a null set, whose complement is dense in the positive-dimensional ball. Hence choose a good parameter a inside the genuinely small ball Bsmall, not merely somewhere in Bpar. Define H′(p)=G(p,a) on all of M and H^ on the open complement of S; the formulas agree because η=0 there. Near the support boundary inside M both formulas are the same smooth formula; near the boundary of M the compact containment S⊆M leaves an open region where the map is exactly H^. This proves continuity and smooth extension where needed, without inferring smoothness merely from a limiting equality.

7.1F6F7step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1construct

On {η>0}, the good slice is smooth and transverse. Every central zero lies in O, since D is zero-free and off S the only central zeros were in K^⊆O; here η=1. A zero with η=0 lies outside J and is an unchanged collar zero, smooth and transverse. Thus H′ is smooth and transverse near its entire zero preimage. The family G(p,sa), extended by H^ off S, gives a homotopy fixed on F, endpoints and all original basepoint values, with support compactly contained in the interior-time smooth stratum. Concatenate it with step 3.1; [F7] on the two closed auxiliary-parameter halves gives the asserted alteration from H. Constant endpoint collars persist after shrinking them to miss the compact supports.

8.1F1A1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1step 7.1∎

The preceding construction proves case (b) for all ranks, including empty zero preimages, empty bases and the rank-zero clopen branch. No compactness of B was assumed: all safety bounds concerned images of fixed compact source subsets, and approximation and perturbation suppliers apply to arbitrary smooth targets. Step 1.1 then supplies the normal cobordism. AC is inherited exactly through the countable-choice smoothing, family and transversality suppliers [A1]; finite compact-neighbourhood and bump arguments add no further choice. The Thom basepoint was never treated as a smooth target point.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources