Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Collapse homotopy for a fixed normal identification

Statement

For compact S⊂X, fix (E,α:E→TX∣S/TS). Collapses made with any two compatible tubular charts, positive sufficiently small radii and supplied metrics represent the same based homotopy class, after the canonical radial identification of the metric targets. Compatibility means identity induced normal derivative after identifying with α; an arbitrary normal bundle automorphism is not an auxiliary tubular choice.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two charts Φ0,Φ1 for exactly the same specified normal data.

[F1]

Pontryagin–Thom collapse with specified normal data imposes the induced normal derivative condition.

[F2]

Continuity and smooth local representatives of collapse proves continuity and interpolation of radial profiles.

[F3]

Metric independence of the Thom space supplies metric comparison.

Proof

1.1F1constructalgebra

Shrink around 0S so ψ=Φ1−1Φ0 and its inverse are defined. It fixes 0S and induces the identity on the normal quotient by [F1]. For fiber dilation δt, define ψt=δ1/tψδt for t>0, and ψ0=id⁡. In bundle charts write ψ(x,v)=(b(x,v),w(x,v)), using a target trivialization near x. Then b(x,0)=x, w(x,0)=0 and ∂vw(x,0)=I. Taylor's integral formula writes w(x,tv)/t=∫01∂vw(x,utv)v du, while b(x,tv)→x. These formulas prove smooth extension at t=0 with value (x,v). They are coordinate-compatible because the dilation is intrinsic.

2.1F1step 1.1

Apply the same formulas to ψ−1. Compactness of S×I gives a single small disk on which the two families and their composites are defined; shrinking again if necessary, their compositions are the identity, by the identity for t>0 and continuity at zero. Thus each ψt is a diffeomorphism onto its image, and Φ1ψt is a smooth path of compatible tubular charts from Φ1 to the germ of Φ0. Its induced normal derivative remains the identity: in the above local expression ∂v(w(x,tv)/t)∣v=0=I, while the horizontal derivative is irrelevant to the normal quotient. A common small closed tube exists by compactness.

3.1F2step 2.1construct

Use that common radius to collapse along Φ1ψt. The inverse tube coordinates vary smoothly. The track of the closed tubes is a compact subset of X×I, its boundary maps to the basepoint, and closed pasting as in [F2] proves joint continuity; at a compactification point the compact track gives a uniform constant neighborhood. This supplies the based homotopy of the common-radius endpoint collapses. Interpolate each endpoint radius to its original radius within that endpoint chart: the formula is fiber scaling on the varying tube, agrees with the basepoint at its boundary, and is jointly continuous by the same compact-track argument. Radial cutoffs are covered by [F2].

4.1F3step 3.1∎

Finally interpolate metrics by ht=(1−t)h0+th1, use their canonical radial maps [F3] to express all targets in the h0 model, and choose a common small tube uniformly in t. The formulas and pasting of step 3.1 give the corresponding homotopy. Concatenation proves precisely the stated choice independence. If a chart is instead precomposed with a normal automorphism, step 1.1 limits to that automorphism rather than the identity; for a point and a reflected normal line the resulting sphere maps have opposite degree. Hence preserving the specified normal data is essential to this proof and statement.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources