How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Statement
(Equinumerous sets, and ): the plane of pairs of naturals is countably infinite (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable).
The bijection is exhibited, not merely asserted to exist. Define by recursion on (The recursion theorem) by and , and set
Then is a bijection from onto , and is a bijection from onto , so is a bijection . What makes bijective is the decomposition of a nonzero natural into a power of two times an odd number, existence and uniqueness both.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Addition and multiplication on with , , and (Addition of natural numbers, Multiplication of natural numbers); . Call even if for some and odd if for some .
Recursion: for a set , and there is with and (The recursion theorem).
Peano: and is injective (The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system); every nonzero natural is a successor (Every nonzero natural number is a successor).
Arithmetic laws: and are commutative and associative, , , and (Addition is commutative, Addition is associative, Left identity for addition, Multiplication is commutative, Multiplication is associative, Zero and one under multiplication, Distributivity and the successor law for multiplication, Left successor law for addition).
Order laws: exactly one of , , holds (Trichotomy of the order on ); is reflexive, antisymmetric, transitive and total ( is a linear order on ), so is transitive and mixes with , in the sense that each of , and gives : transitivity of gives in every case, while would force or by antisymmetry, contradicting whichever of the two hypotheses is strict; and is irreflexive, because would demand (Order on the natural numbers); and (Order is compatible with addition); , so (Discreteness: is the immediate successor); and means for some (Order on the natural numbers), where moreover holds exactly when that is nonzero, since gives , while with would give and hence by additive cancellation (Addition is cancellative, Addition is commutative, Left identity for addition).
Cancellation: with gives (Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor); and forces or (The natural numbers have no zero divisors).
Induction (The principle of mathematical induction) and strong induction (Strong (complete) induction).
Bijections, injections, surjections, composition and inverses (Injection, surjection, bijection); means a bijection exists (Equinumerous sets, and ).
Proof
Apply [L1] with , and : this defines with and for all .
Every natural is even or odd: by induction, is even; and if is even then is odd, while if is odd then is even, using and .
No natural is both even and odd, that is for all : if then ; if then , so ; in both cases the two sides differ by irreflexivity of .
is a bijection from onto : it is injective by [L2], its values are nonzero by [L2], and every nonzero natural is a value of by [L2].
for every : by induction, ; and if then for some by [L2], so .
for all : by induction on , at both sides are since and ; and if then .
Define by . Its values are nonzero: by step 2.1 and by [L2], so by [L5]. Thus maps into .
is injective. Suppose ; by [L4] we may assume , the other case being symmetric, and write . By step 2.2 the right side is , so cancelling the nonzero factor with [L5] and [L3] gives . If then by [L2] and , so the right side equals with , by [L3]; that would make both odd and even, contradicting step 1.3. Hence and , and then gives by injectivity of , whence because would force by [L4] and [L3], and symmetrically for .
is surjective onto : by strong induction [L6] we show every is or a value of . Let and assume the claim for all . By step 1.2, is odd or even. If then by [L3]. If then , since would give ; also by [L4], because with ; so the hypothesis at and give for some , and then by [L3] and step 1.1.
Therefore is a bijection from onto , and composing with the inverse of the bijection of step 1.4 yields the bijection ; hence and is countably infinite.
Remarks
-
Written out, , the standard bijection. The detour through avoids subtraction, which the naturals do not have as a total operation.
-
The proof is a proof of unique factorisation into a power of two times an odd number: step 4.2 is existence and step 4.1 is uniqueness. Nothing weaker would do, and no appeal to a picture of the diagonal enumeration is made anywhere. Nothing here uses any choice principle.
-
The Cantor pairing polynomial is an alternative bijection. It is not used because halving is not available in without first developing division with remainder, whereas doubling, which is all needs, is immediate from addition.
Depends on
- Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable
- Equinumerous sets, $A \approx B$ and $A \preceq B$
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- The natural numbers have no zero divisors
- Strong (complete) induction
- The recursion theorem
- The principle of mathematical induction
- The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system
- Every nonzero natural number is a successor
- Addition of natural numbers
- Multiplication of natural numbers
- Order on the natural numbers
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- Addition is commutative
- Addition is associative
- Addition is cancellative
- Left identity for addition
- Left successor law for addition
- Multiplication is commutative
- Multiplication is associative
- Distributivity and the successor law for multiplication
- Zero and one under multiplication
- Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor
- Order is compatible with addition
- Trichotomy of the order on $\mathbb{N}$
- $\le$ is a linear order on $\mathbb{N}$
- Discreteness: $\sigma(n)$ is the immediate successor
Used by
- ℚ is F_σ, meager and not G_δ, while the irrationals are G_δ, residual and not F_σ Corollary
- The irrationals are uncountable Corollary
- The rational points of [0,1]² form a bounded null set that is not Jordan measurable Counterexample
- Nowhere dense, meager (first category), residual, and second category subsets of ℝ Definition
- The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies placed in the connectedness hierarchy Example
- ℵ₀ ⊕ ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ ⊗ ℵ₀ = ℵ₀, ℵ₁ ⊕ ℵ₀ = ℵ₁ and 5 ⊕ ℵ₀ = ℵ₀, computed from absorption and, in the countable cases, independently from the published bijection ω × ω ≈ ω Example
- FALSE: countable unions of countable sets are countable is a theorem of ZF False statement
- FALSE: for all sets A and B with B having at least two elements, A × B is strictly larger than A False statement
- Subsets and countable unions of null subsets of ℝᵐ are null Lemma
- A countable union of measure-zero sets has measure zero, by countable choice Theorem
- A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable Theorem
- Countable unions of at most countable sets, assuming AC_ω Theorem
- Fubini for double series: if ∑ᵢ ∑ⱼ |aᵢⱼ| converges then both iterated sums and the sum along every bijection ℕ → ℕ × ℕ converge to one and the same value Theorem
- Hessenberg: κ ⊗ κ = κ for every infinite cardinal κ, proved in ZF from the canonical well-order of κ × κ Theorem
- ℚ is countably infinite Theorem
- The Smith-Volterra-Cantor set is compact, perfect and nowhere dense, and does not have measure zero Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 53 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. K. Hunter, An Introduction to Real Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis: Introduction to Real Analysis, basic set theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pairing function (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Countable set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)