Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Shelah inner model is closed under ambient omega-sequences

Statement

If f belongs to the ambient ZFC forcing extension and maps ω into N=HOD(S), then f itself belongs to N.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The class N=HOD(S) of The Shelah HOD(S) model and its real-ordinal presentation and an ambient function f:ωN.

[F1]

The Shelah HOD(S) model and its real-ordinal presentation with Ordinal definability and HOD: membership in N means hereditary OD(S)-definability, so every yN has a code consisting of a formula, a rank, finitely many ordinals and one member of S.

[F2]

N×NN supplies a fixed definable bijection b:ω×ωω.

[F3]

The Axiom of Choice supplies a choice function on a set of nonempty sets; Collection first bounds the witnesses used below.

[F4]

Montague–Lévy reflection for a finite formula family reflects each fixed finite family of formulas, with arbitrary set parameters in the reflecting rank. Thus an ambient unique definition from an S-parameter and finitely many ordinals gives a rank definition with the same parameters.

Proof

1.1

A valid definition code is a tuple c=(e,θ,k,aj:j<k,s), where e,k<ω, θ>0 is an ordinal, sSVθ, each aj<θ, and the formula with code e has a unique solution yVθ with parameters s,a0,,ak1. Write R(c,y) for this assertion. Set satisfaction makes R a single first-order relation; no truth predicate for the universe is used. For every yN, hereditary membership includes yOD(S), so [F1] supplies such a code. Retain all its components rather than treating the rank as a code for the formula and tuple.

F1
2.1

For every n<ω some set code c satisfies R(c,f(n)). Collection yields a set C containing a witness for each n. Separation gives nonempty sets Cn={cC:R(c,f(n))}. Apply [F3] once to the set {Cn:n<ω}, and compose its choice function with nCn to obtain cn=(en,θn,kn,an,j:j<kn,sn)Cn. This selects from sets, not proper classes.

F3step 1.1
3.1

For each n define an ordinal sequence tn by tn(0)=en, tn(1)=θn, tn(2)=kn, tn(3+2j)=an,j for j<kn and tn(3+2j)=0 otherwise, and tn(4+2j)=sn(j) for every j<ω. Define s(b(n,j))=tn(j) using [F2]. Replacement produces this function on ω; the supremum of its set of ordinal values, plus one, bounds its range, so sS. Decoding recovers all five components of every cn, including the empty tuple when kn=0.

F1F2step 2.1
4.1

The fixed first-order condition on a set g saying that g is a function with domain ω and R(cn,g(n)) holds for each n, with cn decoded from s as in step 3.1, has the unique solution g=f. Existence follows from the selected codes and uniqueness from their unique solutions. Reflect this formula and its uniqueness assertion to a rank containing f and s by [F4]. Thus fOD(S) under the rank-definition convention. Its graph consists of the ordered pairs (n,f(n)), not (f(n),n); its values need not be ordinals.

F1F4step 1.1step 3.1
5.1

Finite sets of OD(S) objects are again in OD(S). Indeed combine finitely many of their valid codes into one ordinal sequence by the coding of step 3.1; the fixed relation R uniquely reconstructs each object, and an ambient formula uniquely specifies their finite set. Reflection as in step 4.1 gives a rank definition. Every ordinal is ordinal definable using itself as parameter. Since f(n)N, each f(n) and all its descendants are in OD(S) by [F1]. For the Kuratowski pair (n,f(n))={{n},{n,f(n)}}, the pair and its two members are in OD(S) by finite-set closure; their further descendants are ordinals below n, or f(n) and its descendants. Together with fOD(S), this accounts for every member of tc({f}). Hence fN.

F1F2F4step 3.1step 4.1
6.1

The selected codes, explicit decoding and hereditary check prove that every ambient function f:ωN belongs to N. The argument uses only the defining class HOD(S) in the ambient ZFC universe, not any homogeneity or regularity assertion about the Shelah forcing.

step 2.1step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources